STUbL-mediated degradation of the transcription factor MATα2 requires degradation elements that coincide with corepressor binding sites

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 26, Issue 19, 2015, Pages 3401-3412

  Hickey, Christopher M ^a   Hochstrasser, Mark ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLOHEXIMIDE; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE PROTEIN 1; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; SUMO TARGETED UBIQUITIN LIGASE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MAT ALPHA2; UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME E2; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; MATA2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MCM1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SLX5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SLX8 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; UBC4 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE LOCUS; GENE REPRESSION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; UBIQUITINATION; YEAST CELL; BINDING COMPETITION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUMOYLATION;

BINDING SITES; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; MINICHROMOSOME MAINTENANCE 1 PROTEIN; PROTEOLYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SUMOYLATION; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84943172482     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: 19394586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E15-06-0436     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abed M, Barry KC, Kenyagin D, Koltun B, Phippen TM, Delrow JJ, Parkhurst SM, Orian A (2011). Degringolade, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase, i nhibits Hairy/Groucho-mediated repression. EMBO J 30, 1289-1301.
2. Ast T, Aviram N, Chuartzman SG, Schuldiner M (2014). A cytosolic degradation pathway, prERAD, monitors pre-inserted secretory pathway proteins. J Cell Sci 127, 3017-3023.
3. Bastajian N, Friesen H, Andrews BJ (2013). Bck2 acts through the MADS box protein Mcm1 to activate cell-cycle-regulated genes in budding yeast. PLoS Genet 9, e1003507.
4. Boros J, Lim FL, Darieva Z, Pic-Taylor A, Harman R, Morgan BA, Sharrocks AD (2003). Molecular determinants of the cell-cycle regulated Mcm1p-Fkh2p transcription factor complex. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 2279-2288.
5. Bruhn L, Sprague GF Jr. (1994). MCM1 point mutants deficient in expression of alpha-specific genes: residues important for interaction with alpha 1. Mol Cell Biol 14, 2534-2544.
6. Burgess RC,Rahman S,Lisby M,Rothstein R,Zhao X 2007 The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination Mol Cell Biol, 27, 6153-6162.
7. Carroll C W, Morgan DO (2005). Enzymology of the anaphase-promoting complex. Methods Enzymol 398, 219-230.
8. Chen P, Johnson P, Sommer T, Jentsch S, Hochstrasser M (1993). Multiple ubiquitin-conjug ating enzymes participate in the in vivo degradation of the yeast MAT alpha 2 repressor. Cell 74, 357-369.
9. Darieva Z, Clancy A, Bulmer R, Williams E, Pic-Taylor A, Morgan BA, Sharrocks AD (2010). A competitive transcription factor binding mechanism determines the timing of late cell cycle-dependent gene expression. Mol Cell 38, 29-40.
10. Foresti O, Ruggiano A, Hannibal-Bach HK, Ejsing CS, Carvalho P ( 2013). Sterol homeostasis requires regulated degradation of squalene monooxygenase by the ubiquitin ligase Doa10/Teb4. Elife 2, e00953.
11. Gilon T, Chomsky O, Kulka RG (1998). Degradation signals for ubiquitin system proteolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 17, 2759-2766.
12. Haber JE (2012). Mating-type genes and MAT switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 191, 33-64.
13. Hall M N, Johnson AD (1987). Homeo domain of the yeast repressor alpha 2 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding domain but is not sufficient for repression. Science 237, 1007-1012.
14. Hochstrasser M (2009). Origin a nd function of ubiquitin-like proteins. Nature 458, 422-429.
15. Hochstrasser M, Ellison MJ, Chau V, Varshavsky A (1991). The short-lived MAT alpha 2 transcriptional regulator is ubiquitinated in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 4606-4610.
16. Hochstrasser M, Varshavsky A (1990). In vivo degradation of a transcriptional regulator: the yeast alpha 2 repressor. Cell 61, 697-708.
17. Holland PW ( 2013). Evolution of homeobox genes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2, 31-45.
18. Hwang CS, Shemorry A, Varshavsky A (2010). N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 327, 973-977.
19. Inobe T, Matouschek A (2014). Paradigms of protein degradation by the proteasome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 24, 156-164.
20. Johnson AD, Herskowitz I (1985). A repressor (MAT alpha 2 product) and its operator control expression of a set of cell type specific genes in yeast. Cell 42, 237-247.
21. Johnson PR, Swanson R, Rakhilina L, Hochstra sser M (1998). Degradation signal masking by heterodimerization of MAT?2 and MATa1 blocks their mutual destruction by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cell 94, 217-227.
22. Keleher CA, Goutte C, Johnson AD (1988). The yeast cell-type-specific repressor alpha 2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein. Cell 53, 927-936.
23. Keleher CA, Passmore S, Johnson AD (1989). Yeast repressor alpha 2 binds to its operator cooperatively with yeast protein Mcm1. Mol Cell Biol 9, 5228-5230.
24. Kim I, Miller CR, Young DL, Fields S (2013). High-throughput analysis of in vivo protein stability. Mol Cell Proteomics 12, 3370-3378.
25. Komachi K, Redd MJ, Johnson AD (1994). The WD repeats of Tup1 interact with the homeo domain protein alpha 2. Genes Dev 8, 2857-2867.
26. Kriegenburg F, Ellg aard L, Hartmann-Petersen R (2012). Molecular chaperones in targeting misfolded proteins for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. FEBS J 279, 532-542.
27. Kushnirov VV (2000). Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast 16, 857-860.
28. Laney JD,Hochstrasser M 2003 Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the yeast Mat?2 repressor enables a switch in developmental state Genes Dev, 17, 2259-2270
29. Laney JD, Mobley EF, Hochstrasser M (2006). The short-lived Mat?2 transcriptional repressor is protected from degradation in vivo by interactions with its corepressors Tup1 and Ssn6. Mol Cell Biol 26, 371-38 0.
30. Longtine MS, McKenzie A III, Demarini DJ, Shah NG, Wach A, Brachat A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR (1998). Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Sacch aromyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953-961.
31. Malave TM, Dent SY (2006). Transcriptional repression by Tup1-Ssn6. Biochem Cell Biol 84, 437-443.
32. Mead J, Zhong H, Acton TB, Vershon AK (1996). The yeast ?2 and Mcm1 proteins interact through a region similar to a motif found in homeodomain proteins of higher eukaryotes. Mol Cell Biol 16, 2135-2143.
33. Metzger MB, Maurer MJ, Dancy BM, Michaelis S (2008). Degradation of a cytosolic protein requires endoplasmic reticulum-Associated degradation machinery. J Biol Chem 283, 32302-32316.
34. Mullen JR , Kaliraman V, Ibrahim SS, Brill SJ (2001). Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157, 103-118.
35. Mumberg D, Mulle r R, Funk M (1994). Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. Nucleic Acids Res 22, 5767-5768.
36. Nixon CE, Wilcox AJ, Laney JD (2010). Degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating-type regulator ?1: genetic dissection of cis-determinants and trans-Acting pathways. Genetics 185, 497-511.
37. Ostapenko D, Burton JL, Wang R, Solomon MJ (2008). Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acm1: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 28, 4653-4664.
38. Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, Slavin DA, Perry JJ, Tainer JA, McGowan CH, Boddy MN (2007). SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 26, 4089-4101.
39. Ra vid T, Hochstrasser M (2008). Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9, 679-690.
40. Ravid T, Kreft SG, Hochstrasser M (2006). Membrane and soluble substrates of the Doa10 ubiquitin ligase are degraded by distinct pathways. EMBO J 25, 533-543.
41. Rubenstein EM, Hochstrasser M (2010). Redundancy and variation in the ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic targeting of a transcription factor. Cell Cycle 9, 4282-4285.
42. Sikorski RS, Hieter P (1989). A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122, 19-27.
43. Smith RL, Johnson AD (2000). A sequence resembling a peroxisomal targeting sequence directs the interaction between the tetratricopeptide repeats of Ssn6 and the homeodomain of alpha 2. Proc Na tl Acad Sci USA 97, 3901-3906.
44. Smith RL, Redd MJ, Johnson AD (1995). The tetratricopeptide repeats of Ssn6 interact with the homeo domain of alpha 2. Genes Dev 9, 2903-2910.
45. Sun H, Leverson JD, Hunter T (2007). Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins. EMBO J 26, 4102-4112.
46. Swanson R, Locher M, Hochstrasser M (2001). A conserved ubiquitin ligase of the nuclear envelope/endoplasmic reticulum that functions in both ER-Associated and Mat?2 repressor degradation. Genes Dev 15, 2660-2674.
47. Tan S, Richmond TJ (1998). Crystal structure of the yeast MAT?2/MCM1/DNA ternary complex. Nature 391, 660-666.
48. Tomko RJ Jr., Hochstrasser M (2013). Molecular architecture and assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 82, 415-445.
49. Uckelmann M,Sixma TK 2015 Make them, break them, and catch them: studying rare ubiquitin chains Mol Cell, 58, 1-2.
50. Uzu nova K, Gottsche K, Miteva M, Weisshaar SR, Glanemann C, Schnellhardt M, Niessen M, Scheel H, Hofmann K, Johnson ES, et al. (2007). Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J Biol Ch em 282, 34167-34175.
51. Varanasi US, Klis M, Mikesell PB, Trumbly RJ (1996). The Cyc8 (Ssn6)-Tup1 corepressor complex is composed of one Cyc8 and four Tup1 subunits. Mol Cell Biol 16, 6707-6714.
52. Varshavsky A (2012). The ubiquitin system, an immense realm. Annu Rev Biochem 81, 167-176.
53. Vershon AK, Jin Y, Johnson AD (1995). A homeo domain protein lacking specific side chains of helix 3 can still bind DNA and direct transcriptional repression. Genes Dev 9, 182-192.
54. Wolberger C, Vershon AK, Liu B, Johnson AD, Pabo CO (1991). Crystal structure of a MAT alpha 2 homeodomain-ope rator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell 67, 517-528.
55. Xie Y, Kerscher O, Kroetz MB, McConchie HF, Sung P, Hochstrasser M (2007). The yeast Hex3.Slx8 heterodi mer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J Biol Chem 282, 34176-34184.
56. Xie Y, Rubenstein EM, Matt T, Hochstrasser M (2010). SUMO-independent in vivo activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquit in ligase toward a short-lived transcription factor. Genes Dev 24, 893-903.
57. Zhang C, Roberts TM, Yang J, Desai R, Brown GW (2006). Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 5, 336-346.
58. Zheng L, Baumann U, Reymond JL (2004). An efficient one-step sitedirected and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res 32, e115.