Paradigms of protein degradation by the proteasome

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 156-164

  Inobe, Tomonao ^a   Matouschek, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOYAMA   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA 26S; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; 26S PROTEASOME; ENZYME ACTIVATOR; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ENZYME ACTIVITY; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOSOL; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; EUKARYOTIC CELL; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PROTEIN CONTENT; PROTEIN DEFECT; PROTEIN TARGETING;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEINS; PROTEOLYSIS; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITINATION;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84896032345     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.02.002     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78:477-513.
2. Tomko R.J., Hochstrasser M. Molecular architecture and assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome. Annu Rev Biochem 2013, 82:415-445.
3. Bohn S., Beck F., Sakata E., Walzthoeni T., Beck M., Aebersold R., Förster F., Baumeister W., Nickell S. Structure of the 26S proteasome from Schizosaccharomyces pombe at subnanometer resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:20992-20997.
4. Sakata E., Bohn S., Mihalache O., Kiss P., Beck F., Nagy I., Nickell S., Tanaka K., Saeki Y., Förster F., et al. Localization of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:1479-1484.
5. Lander G.C., Estrin E., Matyskiela M.E., Bashore C., Nogales E., Martin A. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 2012, 482:186-191.
6. Lasker K., Förster F., Bohn S., Walzthoeni T., Villa E., Unverdorben P., Beck F., Aebersold R., Sali A., Baumeister W. Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:1380-1387.
7. Beck F., Unverdorben P., Bohn S., Schweitzer A., Pfeifer G., Sakata E., Nickell S., Plitzko J.M., Villa E., Baumeister W., et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:14870-14875.
8. da Fonseca P.C.A., He J., Morris E.P. Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol Cell 2012, 46:54-66.
9. Matyskiela M.E., Lander G.C., Martin A. Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013, 20:781-788.
10. Śledź P., Unverdorben P., Beck F., Pfeifer G., Schweitzer A., Förster F., Baumeister W. Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:7264-7269.
11. Husnjak K., Elsasser S., Zhang N., Chen X., Randles L., Shi Y., Hofmann K., Walters K.J., Finley D., Dikic I. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 2008, 453:481-488.
12. Bech-Otschir D., Helfrich A., Enenkel C., Consiglieri G., Seeger M., Holzhütter H.-G., Dahlmann B., Kloetzel P.-M. Polyubiquitin substrates allosterically activate their own degradation by the 26S proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009, 16:219-225.
13. Peth A., Besche H.C., Goldberg A.L. Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasome by binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which causes 20S gate opening. Mol Cell 2009, 36:794-804.
14. Li X., Demartino G.N. Variably modulated gating of the 26S proteasome by ATP and polyubiquitin. Biochem J 2009, 421:397-404.
15. Barthelme D., Sauer R.T. Identification of the Cdc48·20S proteasome as an ancient AAA+ proteolytic machine. Science 2012, 337:843-846.
16. Barthelme D., Sauer R.T. Bipartite determinants mediate an evolutionarily conserved interaction between Cdc48 and the 20S peptidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:3327-3332.
17. Brodsky J.L. Cleaning up: ER-associated degradation to the rescue. Cell 2012, 151:1163-1167.
18. Sauer R.T., Baker T.A. AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu Rev Biochem 2011, 80:587-612.
19. Stadtmueller B.M., Hill C.P. Proteasome activators. Mol Cell 2011, 41:8-19.
20. Komander D., Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem 2012, 81:203-229.
21. Ravid T., Hochstrasser M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:679-690.
22. Deshaies R.J., Joazeiro C.A.P. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 2009, 78:399-434.
23. Komander D., Clague M.J., Urbé S. Breaking the chains: structure and function of the deubiquitinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:550-563.
24. Kim W., Bennett E.J., Huttlin E.L., Guo A., Li J., Possemato A., Sowa M.E., Rad R., Rush J., Comb M.J., et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. Mol Cell 2011, 44:325-340.
25. Thrower J.S., Hoffman L., Rechsteiner M., Pickart C.M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J 2000, 19:94-102.
26. Saeki Y., Kudo T., Sone T., Kikuchi Y., Yokosawa H., Toh-E A., Tanaka K. Lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome. EMBO J 2009, 28:359-371.
27. Xu P., Duong D.M., Seyfried N.T., Cheng D., Xie Y., Robert J., Rush J., Hochstrasser M., Finley D., Peng J. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 2009, 137:133-145.
28. Boutet S.C., Disatnik M.-H., Chan L.S., Iori K., Rando T.A. Regulation of Pax3 by proteasomal degradation of monoubiquitinated protein in skeletal muscle progenitors. Cell 2007, 130:349-362.
29. Shabek N., Herman-Bachinsky Y., Buchsbaum S., Lewinson O., Haj-Yahya M., Hejjaoui M., Lashuel H.A., Sommer T., Brik A., Ciechanover A. The size of the proteasomal substrate determines whether its degradation will be mediated by mono- or polyubiquitylation. Mol Cell 2012, 48:87-97.
30. Dimova N.V., Hathaway N.A., Lee B.-H., Kirkpatrick D.S., Berkowitz M.L., Gygi S.P., Finley D., King R.W. APC/C-mediated multiple monoubiquitylation provides an alternative degradation signal for cyclin B1. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:168-176.
31. Nathan J.A., Kim H.T., Ting L., Gygi S.P., Goldberg A.L. Why do cellular proteins linked to K63-polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes?. EMBO J 2013, 32:552-565.
32. Lee C., Schwartz M.P., Prakash S., Iwakura M., Matouschek A. ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. Mol Cell 2001, 7:627-637.
33. Prakash S., Tian L., Ratliff K.S., Lehotzky R.E., Matouschek A. An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004, 11:830-837.
34. Prakash S., Inobe T., Hatch A.J., Matouschek A. Substrate selection by the proteasome during degradation of protein complexes. Nat Chem Biol 2009, 5:29-36.
35. Rape M., Reddy S.K., Kirschner M.W. The processivity of multiubiquitination by the APC determines the order of substrate degradation. Cell 2006, 124:89-103.
36. Reddy S.K., Rape M., Margansky W.A., Kirschner M.W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 2007, 446:921-925.
37. Lam Y.A., Xu W., DeMartino G.N., Cohen R.E. Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome. Nature 1997, 385:737-740.
38. Lee B.-H., Lee M.J., Park S., Oh D.-C., Elsasser S., Chen P.-C., Gartner C., Dimova N., Hanna J., Gygi S.P., et al. Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature 2010, 467:179-184.
39. D'Arcy P., Brnjic S., Olofsson M.H., Fryknäs M., Lindsten K., De Cesare M., Perego P., Sadeghi B., Hassan M., Larsson R., et al. Inhibition of proteasome deubiquitinating activity as a new cancer therapy. Nat Med 2011, 17:1636-1640.
40. Kisselev A.F., van der Linden W.A., Overkleeft H.S. Proteasome inhibitors: an expanding army attacking a unique target. Chem Biol 2012, 19:99-115.
41. Varshavsky A. The ubiquitin system, an immense realm. Annu Rev Biochem 2012, 81:167-176.
42. Crosas B., Hanna J., Kirkpatrick D.S., Zhang D.P., Tone Y., Hathaway N.A., Buecker C., Leggett D.S., Schmidt M., King R.W., et al. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 2006, 127:1401-1413.
43. Tian L., Holmgren R.A., Matouschek A. A conserved processing mechanism regulates the activity of transcription factors Cubitus interruptus and NF-kappaB. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005, 12:1045-1053.
44. Aviram S., Kornitzer D. The ubiquitin ligase Hul5 promotes proteasomal processivity. Mol Cell Biol 2010, 30:985-994.
45. Takeuchi J., Chen H., Coffino P. Proteasome substrate degradation requires association plus extended peptide. EMBO J 2007, 26:123-131.
46. Beckwith R., Estrin E., Worden E.J., Martin A. Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013, 20:1164-1172.
47. Inobe T., Fishbain S., Prakash S., Matouschek A. Defining the geometry of the two-component proteasome degron. Nat Chem Biol 2011, 7:161-167.
48. Ward J.J., Sodhi J.S., McGuffin L.J., Buxton B.F., Jones D.T. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 2004, 337:635-645.
49. Babu M.M., van der Lee R., de Groot N.S., Gsponer J. Intrinsically disordered proteins: regulation and disease. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011, 21:432-440.
50. Gsponer J., Futschik M.E., Teichmann S.A., Babu M.M. Tight regulation of unstructured proteins: from transcript synthesis to protein degradation. Science 2008, 322:1365-1368.
51. Tompa P., Prilusky J., Silman I., Sussman J.L. Structural disorder serves as a weak signal for intracellular protein degradation. Proteins 2008, 71:903-909.
52. Yen H.-C.S., Xu Q., Chou D.M., Zhao Z., Elledge S.J. Global protein stability profiling in mammalian cells. Science 2008, 322:918-923.
53. Yen H.-C.S., Elledge S.J. Identification of SCF ubiquitin ligase substrates by global protein stability profiling. Science 2008, 322:923-929.
54. Suskiewicz M.J., Sussman J.L., Silman I., Shaul Y. Context-dependent resistance to proteolysis of intrinsically disordered proteins. Protein Sci 2011, 20:1285-1297.
55. Radivojac P., Vacic V., Haynes C., Cocklin R.R., Mohan A., Heyen J.W., Goebl M.G., Iakoucheva L.M. Identification, analysis, and prediction of protein ubiquitination sites. Proteins 2010, 78:365-380.
56. Hagai T., Azia A., Tóth-Petróczy Á., Levy Y. Intrinsic disorder in ubiquitination substrates. J Mol Biol 2011, 412:319-324.
57. Hagai T., Levy Y. Ubiquitin not only serves as a tag but also assists degradation by inducing protein unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:2001-2006.
58. Elsasser S., Finley D. Delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to protein-unfolding machines. Nat Cell Biol 2005, 7:742-749.
59. Heessen S., Masucci M., Dantuma N. The UBA2 domain functions as an intrinsic stabilization signal that protects Rad23 from proteasomal degradation. Mol Cell 2005, 18:225-235.
60. Fishbain S., Prakash S., Herrig A., Elsasser S., Matouschek A. Rad23 escapes degradation because it lacks a proteasome initiation region. Nat Commun 2011, 2:192.
61. Heinen C., Acs K., Hoogstraten D., Dantuma N.P. C-terminal UBA domains protect ubiquitin receptors by preventing initiation of protein degradation. Nat Commun 2011, 2:191.
62. Johnson E., Gonda D., Varshavsky A. cis-trans recognition and subunit-specific degradation of short-lived proteins. Nature 1990, 346:287-291.
63. Hochstrasser M., Varshavsky A. In vivo degradation of a transcriptional regulator: the yeast alpha 2 repressor. Cell 1990, 61:697-708.
64. Verma R., McDonald H., Yates J.R., Deshaies R.J. Selective degradation of ubiquitinated Sic1 by purified 26S proteasome yields active S phase cyclin-Cdk. Mol Cell 2001, 8:439-448.
65. Nasmyth K., Shirayama M., Tóth A., Gálová M. APC(Cdc20) promotes exit from mitosis by destroying the anaphase inhibitor Pds1 and cyclin Clb5. Nature 1999, 402:203-207.
66. Baugh J.M., Viktorova E.G., Pilipenko E.V. Proteasomes can degrade a significant proportion of cellular proteins independent of ubiquitination. J Mol Biol 2009, 386:814-827.
67. Murakami Y., Matsufuji S., Kameji T., Hayashi S., Igarashi K., Tamura T., Tanaka K., Ichihara A. Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination. Nature 1992, 360:597-599.
68. Zhang M., Pickart C.M., Coffino P. Determinants of proteasome recognition of ornithine decarboxylase, a ubiquitin-independent substrate. EMBO J 2003, 22:1488-1496.
69. Orlowski M., Wilk S. Catalytic activities of the 20 S proteasome, a multicatalytic proteinase complex. Arch Biochem Biophys 2000, 383:1-16.
70. Chen X., Barton L.F., Chi Y., Clurman B.E., Roberts J.M. Ubiquitin-independent degradation of cell-cycle inhibitors by the REGgamma proteasome. Mol Cell 2007, 26:843-852.
71. Erales J., Coffino P. Ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014, 1843:216-221.
72. Asher G., Bercovich Z., Tsvetkov P., Shaul Y., Kahana C. 20S proteasomal degradation of ornithine decarboxylase is regulated by NQO1. Mol Cell 2005, 17:645-655.
73. Moscovitz O., Tsvetkov P., Hazan N., Michaelevski I., Keisar H., Ben-Nissan G., Shaul Y., Sharon M. A mutually inhibitory feedback loop between the 20S proteasome and its regulator, NQO1. Mol Cell 2012, 47:76-86.
74. Sylvestersen K.B., Young C., Nielsen M.L. Advances in characterizing ubiquitylation sites by mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013, 17:49-58.
75. Xu G., Paige J.S., Jaffrey S.R. Global analysis of lysine ubiquitination by ubiquitin remnant immunoaffinity profiling. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:868-873.
76. Wagner S.A., Beli P., Weinert B.T., Schölz C., Kelstrup C.D., Young C., Nielsen M.L., Olsen J.V., Brakebusch C., Choudhary C. Proteomic analyses reveal divergent ubiquitylation site patterns in murine tissues. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:1578-1585.
77. Wang F., Durfee L.A., Huibregtse J.M. A cotranslational ubiquitination pathway for quality control of misfolded proteins. Mol Cell 2013, 50:368-378.
78. Duttler S., Pechmann S., Frydman J. Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome. Mol Cell 2013, 50:379-393.
79. Belle A., Tanay A., Bitincka L., Shamir R., O'Shea E.K. Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:13004-13009.
80. Schwanhäusser B., Busse D., Li N., Dittmar G., Schuchhardt J., Wolf J., Chen W., Selbach M. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 2011, 473:337-342.
81. Eden E., Geva-Zatorsky N., Issaeva I., Cohen A., Dekel E., Danon T., Cohen L., Mayo A., Alon U. Proteome half-life dynamics in living human cells. Science 2011, 331:764-768.
82. Emanuele M.J., Elia A.E.H., Xu Q., Thoma C.R., Izhar L., Leng Y., Guo A., Chen Y.-N., Rush J., Hsu P.W.-C., et al. Global identification of modular cullin-RING ligase substrates. Cell 2011, 147:459-474.