Policy measures to promote electric mobility - A global perspective

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 82, Issue , 2015, Pages 78-93

  Lieven, Theo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Electric vehicles; Governmental incentives; Policy measurements

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; INVESTMENTS;

CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURES; CHOICE-BASED CONJOINT; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; CONSUMER SATISFACTIONS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES (EVS); GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GOVERNMENTAL INCENTIVES; ZERO EMISSION VEHICLES;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

ELECTRIC VEHICLE; EMISSION CONTROL; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INCENTIVE; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; PLANNING METHOD; PLANNING PROCESS; POLICY APPROACH; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

EID: 84942798471     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abrego L., Perroni C. Investment subsidies and time-consistent environmental policy. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 2002, 54(4):617-635. 10.1093/oep/54.4.617.
2. Åhman M. Government policy and the development of electric vehicles in Japan. Energy Policy 2006, 34:433-443. 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.011.
3. Ajzen I., Brown T.C., Carvajal F. Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: the case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 2004, 30(9):1108-1121. 10.1177/0146167204264079.
4. Andrews R., Ansari A., Currim I.S. Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: a comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery. J. Market. Res. 2002, 39(1):87-98.
5. Arora N., Allenby G.M., Ginter J.L. A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and second demand. Market. Sci. 1998, 17(1):29-44. 10.1287/mksc.17.1.29.
6. Batsell R.R., Louviere J.J. Experimental analysis of choice. Market. Lett. 1991, 2(3):199-214.
7. Becker G.M., DeGroot M.H., Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 1964, 9(3):226-232. 10.1002/bs.3830090304.
8. Berger C., Blauth R., Boger D., Bolster C., Burchill G., DuMouchel W., Pouliot F., Richter R., Rubinoff A., Shen D., Timko M., Walden D. Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center Qual. Manage. 1993, 2(4):2-36.
9. Bornstein B.H. The ecological validity of jury simulations: is the jury still out?. Law Human Behav. 1999, 23(1):75-91.
10. Bunce L., Harris M., Burgess M. Charge up then charge out? Drivers' perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK. Transport. Res. Part A - Pol. 2014, 59:278-287. 10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.001.
11. Carley S., Krause R.M., Lane B.W., Graham J.D. Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: a survey of early impressions in large US cities. Transport. Res. Part D - Transport Environ. 2013, 18:39-45. 10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007.
12. de Haan P., Mueller M.G., Scholz R.W. How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars-Part II: Forecasting effects of feebates based on energy-efficiency. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1083-1094. 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.003.
13. Egbue O., Long S. Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 2012, 48:717-729. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009.
14. Flath C.M., Ilg J.P., Gottwalt S., Schmeck H., Weinhardt C. Improving electric vehicle charging coordination through area pricing. Transport. Sci. 2014, 48(4):619-634. 10.1287/trsc.2013.0467.
15. Franke F., Krems J.F. What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users?. Transport Policy 2013, 30:56-62. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.005.
16. Gnann T., Plötz P., Funke S., Wietschel M. What is the market potential of electric vehicles as commercial passenger cars? A case study from Germany. Transport. Res. Part D - Transport Environ. 2015, 37:171-187. 10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.015.
17. Green D.L., Park S., Liu C. Public policy and the transition to electric drive vehicles in the U.S. : the role of the zero emission vehicles mandates. Energy Strategy Rev. 2014, 5:66-77. 10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.005.
18. Greene D.L., Patterson P.D., Singh M., Li J. Feebates, rebates and gas-guzzler taxes: a study of incentives for increased fuel economy. Energy Policy 2005, 33(6):757-775. 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.003.
19. Green P.E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. J. Consum. Res. 1978, 5(2):103-123.
20. Helveston J.P., Liu Y., Feit E.M., Fuchs E., Klampfl E., Michalek J.J. Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the US and China. Transport Res. Part A - Policy 2015, 73:96-112. 10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.002.
21. Interstate Rest Areas-Rest Areas along Interstate Highways. <> (retrieved 2015-June-19). http://www.interstaterestareas.com/.
22. Kano N., Seraku N., Takahashi F., Tsuji S. Attractive quality and must-be quality. J. Japanese Soc. Qual. Control 1984, 14:39-48.
23. Kieckhäfer K., Volling T., Spengler T.S. A hybrid simulation approach for estimating the market share evolution of electric vehicles. Transp. Sci. 2014, 48(4):657-670. 10.1287/trsc.2014.0526.
24. Kuhfeld W.F., Tobias R.D., Garratt M. Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J. Market. Res. 1994, 31(4):545-557. 10.2307/3151882.
25. Lenk P.J., DeSarbo W.S., Green P.E., Young M.R. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of part-worth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Market. Sci. 1996, 15(2):173-191. 10.1287/mksc.15.2.173.
26. Lenski S.M., Keoleian G.A., Bolon K.M. The impact of "Cash for Clunkers" on greenhouse gas emissions: a life cycle perspective. Environ. Res. Lett. 2010, 5:1-8. 10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044003.
27. Li S., Linn J., Spiller E. Evaluating "Cash-for-Clunkers": program effects on auto sales and the environment. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2013, 65(2):175-193. 10.1016/j.jeem.2012.07.004.
28. Lieven T., Lennerts S. Measuring willingness to pay by means of the trade-off between free available cash and specific-purpose vouchers. BuR - Bus Res. 2013, 6(2):154-171. 10.1007/bf03342747.
29. Lieven T., Mühlmeier S., Henkel S., Waller J.F. Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transport. Res. Part D - Transport Environ. 2011, 16:236-243. 10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.001.
30. Lin Z. Optimizing and diversifying electric vehicle driving range for US drivers. Transport. Sci. 2014, 48(4):635-650. 10.1287/trsc.2013.0516.
31. Lin, Z., Greene, D.L., 2011. Promoting the market for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles-role of recharge availability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2252, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, pp. 49-56, doi:10.3141/2252-07.
32. Louviere J.J. Conjoint analysis modeling of stated preferences: a review of theory, methods, recent developments, and external validity. J. Transport. Econ. Policy 1988, 22(1):93-119.
33. Louviere J.J., Woodworth G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. J. Market. Res. 1983, 20(4):350-367.
34. Matzler K., Hinterhuber H.H. How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 1998, 18(1):25-38.
35. McLean C.P., Anderson A.R. Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2009, 29(6):496-505. 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.003.
36. Mueller M.G., de Haan P. How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars-Part I: Model structure, simulation of bounded rationality, and model validation. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1072-1082. 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.002.
37. Murphy J.J., Allen P.G., Stevens T.H., Weatherhead D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environ. Resource Econ. 2005, 30:313-325. 10.1007/s10640-004-3332-z.
38. National Research Council, 2013. Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels. Committee on Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels; Board on Energy and Environmental Systems; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. <> (retrieved 2015-06-18). http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18264.
39. Ngene 1.1.2 user manual, 2014. <> (retrieved 2015-06-20). https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9406880/NgeneManual112.pdf.
40. Ortúzar J.D.D., Willumsen L.G. Modeling Transport 2011, Wiley and Sons Ltd., UK. fourth ed.
41. Plötz P., Schneider U., Globisch J., Dütschke E. Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transport. Res. Part A - Policy 2014, 67:96-109. 10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006.
42. Popp D. R&D subsidies and climate policy: is there a "free lunch"?. Climat. Change 2006, 77:311-341. 10.1007/s10584-006-9056-z.
43. Rao V.R. Applied Conjoint Analysis 2014, Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.
44. Sierzchula W., Bakker S., Maat K., van Wee B. The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy 2014, 68:183-194. 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043.
45. Skippon S.M. How consumer drivers construe vehicle performance: implications for electric vehicles. Transport. Res. Part F - Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2014, 23:15-31. 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.008.
46. Tyrrell M., Dernbach J.C. The "Cash for Clunkers" program: a sustainability evaluation. Univ. Toledo. Law Rev. 2010-2011, 42:467-492.
47. UK Department for Transport, Office for Low Emission Vehicles and Baroness Krame, 2015. Take-up of Plug-in Car Grant Continues to Rise-Number of Ultra-low Emission Vehicles Breaks 25,000 Barrier. <> (retrieved 2015-02-14). https://www.gov.uk/government/news/take-up-of-plug-in-car-grant-continues-to-rise.
48. Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 1961, 16(1):8-37. 10.2307/2977633.
49. World Bank, 2013. GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). <> (retrieved 2015-06-20). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD.