Structure of mammalian eIF3 in the context of the 43S preinitiation complex

Nature

Volumn 525, Issue 7570, 2015, Pages 491-495

  Des Georges, Amedee ^a   Dhote, Vidya ^b   Kuhn, Lauriane ^c   Hellen, Christopher U T ^b   Pestova, Tatyana V ^b   Frank, Joachim ^a   Hashem, Yaser ^d  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b SUNY Downstate Medical Center   (United States)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INITIATION FACTOR 3; MESSENGER RNA; DHX29 PROTEIN, HUMAN; INITIATION FACTOR; INITIATION FACTOR 2; METHIONINE TRANSFER RNA; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; RNA HELICASE; START CODON;

AMINO ACID; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CYTOLOGY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EUKARYOTE; MAMMAL; PROTEIN; RNA;

ARTICLE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; RIBOSOME; RIBOSOME SUBUNIT; TRANSLATION INITIATION; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; RNA TRANSLATION; SMALL RIBOSOMAL SUBUNIT; START CODON;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA;

BINDING SITES; CODON, INITIATOR; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-2; EUKARYOTIC INITIATION FACTOR-3; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PEPTIDE CHAIN INITIATION, TRANSLATIONAL; PEPTIDE INITIATION FACTORS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; RIBOSOME SUBUNITS, SMALL, EUKARYOTIC; RIBOSOMES; RNA HELICASES; RNA, MESSENGER; RNA, TRANSFER, MET;

EID: 84942531804     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature14891     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Jackson,R. J.,Hellen, C. U.&Pestova, T.V.Themechanismof eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 113-127 (2010).
2. Hinnebusch, A. G. eIF3: a versatile scaffold for translation initiation complexes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 31, 553-562 (2006).
3. Valasek, L. S. 'Ribozoomin'-translation initiation from the perspective of the ribosome-bound eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 13, 305-330 (2012).
4. Ellisdon, A. M., Stewart, M. Structural biology of the PCI-protein fold. BioArchitecture 2, 118-123 (2012).
5. Pena, V., Liu, S., Bujnicki, J. M., Luhrmann, R., Wahl, M. C. Structure of a multipartite protein-protein interaction domain in splicing factor prp8 and its link to retinitis pigmentosa. Mol. Cell 25, 615-624 (2007).
6. Enchev, R. I., Schreiber, A., Beuron, F., Morris, E. P. Structural insights into the COP9 signalosome and its common architecture with the 26S proteasome lid and eIF3. Structure 18, 518-527 (2010).
7. Hashem, Y. et al. Structure of themammalian ribosomal43S preinitiation complex bound to the scanning factor DHX29. Cell 153, 1108-1119 (2013).
8. Hashem, Y. et al. Hepatitis-C-virus-like internal ribosome entry sites displace eIF3 to gain access to the 40S subunit. Nature 503, 539-543 (2013).
9. Querol-Audi, J. et al. Architecture of human translation initiation factor 3. Structure 21, 920-928 (2013).
10. Sun, C. et al. Functional reconstitution of human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20473-20478 (2011).
11. Beck, F. et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14870-14875 (2012).
12. Lander, G. C. et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482, 186-191 (2012).
13. Lingaraju, G. M. et al. Crystal structure of the human COP9 signalosome. Nature 512, 161-165 (2014).
14. ElAntak, L., Tzakos, A. G., Locker, N., Lukavsky, P. J. Structure of eIF3b RNA recognition motif and its interaction with eIF3j: structural insights into the recruitment of eIF3bto the 40Sribosomal subunit. J. Biol.Chem. 282,8165-8174 (2007).
15. Herrmannova, A. et al. Structural analysis of an eIF3 subcomplex reveals conserved interactions required for a stable and proper translation pre-initiation complex assembly. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 2294-2311 (2012).
16. Liu, Y. et al. Translation initiation factor eIF3b contains a nine-bladed b-propeller and interacts with the 40S ribosomal subunit. Structure 22, 923-930 (2014).
17. Erzberger, J. P. et al. Molecular architecture of the 40SeIF1eIF3 translation initiation complex. Cell 158, 1123-1135 (2014).
18. Zhou, M. et al. Mass spectrometry reveals modularity and a complete subunit interaction map of the eukaryotic translation factor eIF3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18139-18144 (2008).
19. Dong, Z.,Qi, J.,Peng, H., Liu, J.&Zhang, J.T.Spectrin domainof eukaryotic initiation factor 3a is the docking site for formation of the a:b:i:g subcomplex. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 27951-27959 (2013).
20. Wagner, S., Herrmannova, A., Malk, R., Peclinovska, L., Valasek, L. S. Functional and biochemical characterization of humaneukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 in living cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 3041-3052 (2014).
21. Masutani, M.,Sonenberg, N., Yokoyama,S.&Imataka, H. Reconstitution reveals the functional core of mammalian eIF3. EMBO J. 26, 3373-3383 (2007).
22. Fraser, C. S. et al. The j-subunit of human translation initiation factor eIF3 is required for the stable binding of eIF3 and its subcomplexes to 40 S ribosomal subunits in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 8946-8956 (2004).
23. Valasek, L., Hasek, J., Trachsel, H., Imre, E. M., Ruis, H. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae HCR1 gene encoding a homologue of the p35 subunit of human translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) is a high copy suppressor of a temperaturesensitive mutation in the Rpg1p subunit of yeast eIF3. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27567-27572 (1999).
24. Estrin, E., Lopez-Blanco, J. R., Chacon, P., Martin, A. Formation of an intricate helical bundle dictates the assembly of the 26S proteasome lid. Structure 21, 1624-1635 (2013).
25. Anger, A. M. et al. Structures of the human and Drosophila 80S ribosome. Nature 497, 80-85 (2013).
26. Schmitt, E. et al. Structure of the ternary initiation complex aIF2-GDPNPmethionylated initiator tRNA. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 450-454 (2012).
27. Dhote, V., Sweeney, T. R., Kim, N., Hellen, C. U., Pestova, T. V. Roles of individual domains in the function of DHX29, an essential factor required for translation of structured mammalian mRNAs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3150-E3159 (2012).
28. Aylett, C. H., Boehringer, D., Erzberger, J. P., Schaefer, T., Ban, N. Structure of a yeast 40S-eIF1-eIF1A-eIF3-eIF3j initiation complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 269-271 (2015).
29. Kouba, T. et al. Small ribosomal protein RPS0 stimulates translation initiation by mediating 40S-binding of eIF3 via its direct contact with the eIF3a/TIF32 subunit. PLoS ONE 7, e40464 (2012).
30. Valasek, L. et al. The yeast eIF3 subunits TIF32/a, NIP1/c, eIF5 make critical connections with the 40S ribosome in vivo. Genes Dev. 17, 786-799 (2003).
31. Pisarev, A. V., Kolupaeva, V. G., Yusupov, M. M., Hellen, C. U., Pestova, T. V. Ribosomal position and contacts of mRNA in eukaryotic translation initiation complexes. EMBO J. 27, 1609-1621 (2008).
32. Zhou, C. et al. PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m define distinct translation initiation factor 3 complexes. BMC Biol. 3, 14 (2005).
33. Rezende, A. M. et al. The translation initiation complex eIF3 in trypanosomatids andotherpathogenic excavates-identificationof conservedanddivergent features based on orthologue analysis. BMC Genomics 15, 1175 (2014).
34. LeFebvre, A. K. et al. Translation initiation factor eIF4G-1 binds to eIF3 through the eIF3E subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 22917-22932 (2006).
35. Villa, N., Do, A., Hershey, J. W. B., Fraser, C. S. Human eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) binds to eIF3c,-d,-e to promote mRNA recruitment to the ribosome. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 32932-32940 (2013).
36. Yu, Y., Abaeva, I. S., Marintchev, A., Pestova, T. V., Hellen, C. U. Common conformational changes induced in type 2 picornavirus IRESs by cognate transacting factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 4851-4865 (2011).
37. Chiu, W. L. et al. The C-terminal region of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3a (eIF3a) promotes mRNA recruitment, scanning, together with eIF3j and the eIF3b RNA recognition motif, selection of AUG start codons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 4415-4434 (2010).
38. Elantak, L. et al. The indispensable N-terminal half of eIF3j/HCR1 cooperates with its structurally conserved binding partner eIF3b/PRT1-RRM and with eIF1A in stringent AUG selection. J. Mol. Biol. 396, 1097-1116 (2010).
39. Cuchalova, L. et al. The RNA recognition motif of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3g (eIF3g) is required for resumption of scanning of posttermination ribosomes for reinitiation on GCN4 and together with eIF3i stimulates linear scanning. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 4671-4686 (2010).
40. Pisareva, V. P., Pisarev, A. V., Komar, A. A., Hellen, C. U., Pestova, T. V. Translation initiation on mammalian mRNAs with structured 59UTRs requires DExH-box protein DHX29. Cell 135, 1237-1250 (2008).
41. Grassucci, R. A., Taylor, D. J., Frank, J. Preparation of macromolecular complexes for cryo-electron microscopy. Nature Protocols 2, 3239-3246 (2007).
42. Dubochet, J. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q. Rev. Biophys. 21, 129-228 (1988).
43. Wagenknecht, T., Frank, J., Boublik, M., Nurse, K., Ofengand, J. Direct localization of the tRNA-anticodon interaction site on the Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal subunit by electron microscopy and computerized image averaging. J. Mol. Biol. 203, 753-760 (1988).
44. Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41-60 (2005).
45. Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable nearatomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nature Methods 10, 584-590 (2013).
46. Frank, J. et al. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 190-199 (1996).
47. Langlois, R. et al. Automated particle picking for low-contrast macromolecules in cryo-electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 186, 1-7 (2014).
48. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012).
49. Rosenthal, P. B., Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J.Mol. Biol. 333, 721-745 (2003).
50. Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24-35 (2013).
51. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, S. J., Tagare, D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nature Methods 11, 63-65 (2014).
52. Pettersen, E. F. et al.UCSFChimera-a visualization systemfor exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
53. Pintilie, G. D., Zhang, J., Goddard, T. D., Chiu, W., Gossard, D. C. Quantitative analysis of cryo-EM density map segmentation by watershed and scale-space filtering, fitting of structures by alignment to regions. J. Struct. Biol. 170, 427-438 (2010).
54. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D222-D226 (2015).
55. Mitchell, A. et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D213-D221 (2015).
56. Marintchev, A., Wagner, G. Translation initiation: structures, mechanisms and evolution. Q. Rev. Biophys. 37, 197-284 (2004).
57. Lange, H. et al. The RNA helicases AtMTR4 and HEN2 target specific subsets of nuclear transcripts for degradation by the nuclear exosomein Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004564 (2014).
58. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551-3567 (1999).
59. Thiele, H., Glandorf, J.&Hufnagel,P.Bioinformatics strategies in life sciences: from data processinganddatawarehousing tobiological knowledgeextraction. J. Integr. Bioinform. 7, 141 (2010).
60. Elias, J. E., Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 604, 55-71 (2010).
61. Khoshnevis, S. et al. Structural integrity of the PCI domain of eIF3a/TIF32 is required formRNA recruitment to the 43S pre-initiation complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 4123-4139 (2014).
62. Guex, N., Peitsch, M. C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18, 2714-2723 (1997).
63. Wei, Z. et al. Crystal structure of human eIF3k, the first structure of eIF3 subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 34983-34990 (2004).
64. Trabuco, L. G., Villa, E., Mitra, K., Frank, J., Schulten, K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 16, 673-683 (2008).
65. Hashem, Y. et al. High-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Trypanosoma brucei ribosome. Nature 494, 385-389 (2013).
66. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1, 33-8 27-8 (1996).
67. Brooks, B. R. et al.CHARMM: a programformacromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4, 187-217 (1983).
68. MacKerell, A. D. Jr. et al. in The Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry (eds von Rague Schleyer, P. et al.) 271-277 (John Wiley & Sons, 1998).