The CLSA model: A novel framework for concept-level sentiment analysis

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 9042, Issue , 2015, Pages 3-22

  Cambria, Erik ^a   Poria, Soujanya ^a   Bisio, Federica ^b   Bajpai, Rajiv ^a   Chaturvedi, Iti ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING;

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PRODUCT REVIEWS; RETRIEVING TEXTS; SEMANTIC PARSING; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION; TOPIC SPOTTING;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84942524192     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (114)

1. Agirre, E., Ansa, O., Hovy, E., Martínez, D.: Enriching very large ontologies using thewww. arXiv preprint cs/0010026 (2000)
2. Andrzejewski, D., Zhu, X., Craven, M.: Incorporating domain knowledge into topic modelingvia dirichlet forest priors. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conferenceon Machine Learning, pp. 25–32. ACM (2009)
3. Baldwin, B.: Cogniac: high precision coreference with limited knowledge and linguisticresources. In: Proceedings of a Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, RobustAnaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts, pp. 38–45. Association for Computational Linguistics(1997)
4. Barbu, C., Mitkov, R.: Evaluation tool for rule-based anaphora resolution methods. In: Proceedingsof the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.34–41. Association for Computational Linguistics (2001)
5. Bell, D., Koulouri, T., Lauria, S., Macredie, R., Sutton, J.: Microblogging as a mechanismfor human-robot interaction. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 64–77 (2014)
6. Blair-Goldensohn, S., Hannan, K., McDonald, R., Neylon, T., Reis, G.A., Reynar, J.: Buildinga sentiment summarizer for local service reviews. In: Proceedings ofWWW2008Workshopon NLP in the Information Explosion Era (2008)
7. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of MachineLearning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003)
8. Bloom, P.: Glue for the mental world. Nature 421, 212–213 (2003)
9. Bonzanini, M., Martinez-Alvarez, M., Roelleke, T.: Opinion summarisation through sentenceextraction: An investigation with movie reviews. In: Proceedings of the 35th InternationalACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information RetrievalSIGIR 2012, pp. 1121–1122 (2012)
10. Branavan, S.R.K., Chen, H., Eisenstein, J., Barzilay, R.: Learning document-level semanticproperties from free-text annotations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 34(2), 569(2009)
11. Brennan, S.E., Friedman, M.W., Pollard, C.J.: A centering approach to pronouns. In: Proceedingsof the 25th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.155–162. Association for Computational Linguistics (1987)
12. Cambria, E.: An introduction to concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Castro, F., Gelbukh,A., González, M. (eds.) MICAI 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8266, pp. 478–483. Springer,Heidelberg (2013)
13. Cambria, E., Fu, J., Bisio, F., Poria, S.: AffectiveSpace 2: Enabling affective intuition forconcept-level sentiment analysis. In: AAAI, Austin, pp. 508–514 (2015)
14. Cambria, E., Gastaldo, P., Bisio, F., Zunino, R.: An ELM-based model for affective analogicalreasoning. Neurocomputing 149, 443–455 (2015)
15. Cambria, E., Hussain, A.: Sentic Computing: A Common-Sense-Based Framework forConcept-Level Sentiment Analysis. Springer, Cham (2015)
16. Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Havasi, C., Eckl, C., Munro, J.: Towards crowd validation oftheUK national health service. In: WebSci, Raleigh (2010)
17. Cambria, E., Schuller, B., Liu, B., Wang, H., Havasi, C.: Knowledge-based approaches toconcept-level sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2), 12–14 (2013)
18. Cambria, E., Song, Y., Wang, H., Howard, N.: Semantic multi-dimensional scaling for opendomainsentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems 29(2), 44–51 (2014)
19. Cao, C., Feng, Q., Gao, Y., Gu, F., Si, J., Sui, Y., Tian, W., Wang H., Wang, L., Zeng, Q., etal.: Progress in the development of national knowledge infrastructure. Journal of ComputerScience and Technology 17(5), 523–534 (2002)
20. Cardie, C., Wagstaff, K., et al.: Noun phrase coreference as clustering. In: Proceedings ofthe 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processingand Very Large Corpora, pp. 82–89 (1999)
21. Chen, M., Jin, X., Shen, D.: Short text classification improved by learning multi-granularitytopics. In: IJCAI, pp. 1776–1781. Citeseer (2011)
22. Chen, W.L., Zhu, J.B., Yao, T.S., Zhang, Y.X.: Automatic learning field words by bootstrapping.In: Proc. of the JSCL, vol. 72, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (2003)
23. Chen, Z., Liu, B.: Mining topics in documents: standing on the shoulders of big data. In:Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discoveryand Data Mining, pp. 1116–1125. ACM (2014)
24. Chikersal, P., Poria, S., Cambria, E.: SeNTU: Sentiment analysis of tweets by combininga rule-based classifier with supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the International Workshopon Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015) (2015)
25. Cohen, W.W., Hirsh, H.: Joins that generalize: Text classification using whirl. In: KDD, pp.169–173 (1998)
26. Dagan, I., Itai, A.: Automatic processing of large corpora for the resolution of anaphorareferences. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 3,pp. 330–332. Association for Computational Linguistics (1990)
27. Dann, S.: Twitter content classification. First Monday 15(12) (2010)
28. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: Enhanced sentiment learning using twitter hashtagsand smileys. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics:Posters, pp. 241–249. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
29. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences intwitter and amazon. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational NaturalLanguage Learning, pp. 107–116. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
30. Denber, M.: Automatic resolution of anaphora in english. Eastman Kodak Co. (1998)
31. Ding, X., Liu, B., Yu, P.S.: A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proceedingsof First ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM2008), pp. 231–240. Stanford University, Stanford(2008)
32. Du, B., Tian, H., Wang, L., Lu, R.: Design of domain-specific term extractor based onmulti-strategy. Computer Engineering 31(14), 159–160 (2005)
33. Elliott, C.D.: The Affective Reasoner: A Process Model of Emotions in a Multi-Agent System. PhD thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston (1992)
34. Gangemi, A., Presutti, V., Reforgiato, D.: Frame-based detection of opinion holders andtopics: a model and a tool. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 9(1), 20–30 (2014)
35. Gelfand, B., Wulfekuler, M., Punch, W.F.: Automated concept extraction from plain text.In: AAAI 1998 Workshop on Text Categorization, pp. 13–17 (1998)
36. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., Bengio, Y.: Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification:A deep learning approach. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-eight International Conferenceon Machine Learning, ICML (2011)
37. Goertzel, B., Silverman, K., Hartley, C., Bugaj, S., Ross, M.: The Baby Webmind project.In: AISB, Birmingham (2000)
38. González-Ibáñez, R., Muresan, S., Wacholder, N.: Identifying sarcasm in twitter: a closerlook. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics: Human Language Technologies: Short Papers, vol. 2, pp. 581–586. Associationfor Computational Linguistics (2011)
39. Harlambous, Y., Klyuev, V.: Thematically reinforced explicit semantic analysis. InternationalJournal of Computational Linguistics and Applications 4(1), 79–94 (2013)
40. Hearst, M.A.: Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In: Proceedingsof the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 539–545. Association forComputational Linguistics (1992)
41. Hobbs, J.R.: Resolving pronoun references. Lingua 44(4), 311–338 (1978)
42. Hofmann, T.: Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd AnnualInternational ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval,pp. 50–57. ACM (1999)
43. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the ACMSIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 168–177(2004)
44. Hu, Y., Boyd-Graber, J., Satinoff, B., Smith, A.: Interactive topic modeling. Machine Learning 95(3), 423–469 (2014)
45. Jagarlamudi, J., Daumé H, Udupa R.: Incorporating lexical priors into topic models.In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association forComputational Linguistics, pp. 204–213. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)
46. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., Chowdury, A.: Twitter power: Tweets as electronic wordof mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(11),2169–2188 (2009)
47. Jiang, L., Yu, M., Zhou, M., Liu, X., Zhao, T.: Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification.In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 151–160. Association for ComputationalLinguistics (2011)
48. Joachims, T.: Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevantfeatures. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, Springer,Heidelberg (1998)
49. Jung, S., Segev, A.: Analyzing future communities in growing citation networks. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 34–44 (2014)
50. Kalchbrenner, N., Grefenstette, E., Blunsom, P.: A convolutional neural network for modellingsentences. CoRR, abs/1404.2188 (2014)
51. Kennedy, C., Boguraev, B.: Anaphora for everyone: pronominal anaphora resoluation withouta parser. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 1,pp. 113–118. Association for Computational Linguistics (1996)
52. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.: Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad andthe omg! In: ICWSM, vol. 11, pp. 538–541 (2011)
53. Lappin, S., Leass, H.J.: An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computationallinguistics 20(4), 535–561 (1994)
54. Li, X., Xie, H., Chen, L., Wang, J., Deng, X.: News impact on stock price return via sentimentanalysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 14–23 (2014)
55. Liang, T., Wu, D.-S.: Automatic pronominal anaphora resolution in english texts. In:ROCLING (2003)
56. Liebrecht, C.C., Kunneman, F.A., van den Bosch, A.P.J.: The perfect solution for detectingsarcasm in tweets# not. In: ACL (2013)
57. Liu, F., Weng, F., Wang, B., Liu, Y.: Insertion, deletion, or substitution?: normalizing textmessages without pre-categorization nor supervision. In: Proceedings of the 49th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies:Short Papers, vol. 2, pp. 71–76. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)
58. Liu, L., Cao, C., Wang, H.: Acquiring hyponymy relations from large chinese corpus. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics 2(4), 211 (2005)
59. Liu, L., Cao, C.-G., Wang, H.-T., Chen, W.: A method of hyponym acquisition based on“isa" pattern. Journal of Computer Science, 146–151 (2006)
60. Lu, Y., Zhai, C.: Opinion integration through semi-supervised topic modeling. In: Proceedingsof the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 121–130. ACM (2008)
61. Lu, Y., Zhai, C.X., Sundaresan, N.: Rated aspect summarization of short comments. In:Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 131–140. ACM(2009)
62. Mcauliffe, J.D., Blei, D.M.: Supervised topic models. In: Advances in Neural InformationProcessing Systems, pp. 121–128 (2008)
63. Mitkov, R.: Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 36thAnnual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics, vol. 2, pp. 869–875. Association for ComputationalLinguistics (1998)
64. Mitkov, R., Evans, R., Or˘asan, C.: A new, fully automatic version of mitkov’s knowledgepoorpronoun resolution method. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2002. LNCS, vol. 2276,pp. 168–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
65. Mohammad, S.M., Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X.: NRC-Canada: Building the state-of-the-art insentiment analysis of tweets. In: Proceedings of the Second Joint Conference on Lexicaland Computational Semantics (SEMSTAR 2013) (2013)
66. Montejo-Raez, A., Diaz-Galiano, M., Martinez-Santiago, F., Urena-Lopez, A.: Crowd explicitsentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 134–139 (2014)
67. Mukherjee, A., Liu, B.: Aspect extraction through semi-supervised modeling. In: Proceedingsof the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: LongPapers, vol. 1, pp. 339–348. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)
68. Murphyp, G.L.: The big book of concepts. MIT Press (2002)
69. Murray, G., Carenini, G.: Subjectivity detection in spoken and written conversations. NaturalLanguage Engineering 17, 397–418 (2011)
70. Nakata, K., Voss, A., Juhnke, M., Kreifelts, T.: Collaborative concept extraction from documents.In: Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Practical Aspects of Knowledge management(PAKM 1998). Citeseer (1998)
71. Nigam, K., McCallum, A.K., Thrun, S., Mitchell, T.: Text classification from labeled andunlabeled documents using em. Machine Learning 39(2-3), 103–134 (2000)
72. O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: From tweets to polls:Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: ICWSM, vol. 11, pp. 122–129(2010)
73. Ortony, A., Clore, G., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge (1988)
74. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In:LREC (2010)
75. Paltoglou, G., Thelwall, M.: Twitter, myspace, digg: Unsupervised sentiment analysis insocial media. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 3(4), 66(2012)
76. Pang, B., Lee, L.: A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarizationbased on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Associationfor Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004) (2004)
77. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorizationwith respect to rating scales. In: ACL, pp. 115–124. Ann Arbor (2005)
78. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S.: Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machinelearning techniques. In: EMNLP, Philadelphia, pp. 79–86 (2002)
79. Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A.: Contextual valence shifters. In: Computing Attitude and Affect intext: Theory and Applications, pp. 1–10. Springer (2006)
80. Popescu, A.-M., Etzioni,O.: Extracting product features and opinions fromreviews. In: Proceedingsof Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP2005), pp. 3–28 (2005)
81. Poria, S., Agarwal, B., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Howard, N.: Dependency-based semanticparsing for concept-level text analysis. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2014, Part I. LNCS,vol. 8403, pp. 113–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
82. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Huang, G.-B.: Towards an intelligent framework formultimodal affective data analysis. Neural Networks 63, 104–116 (2015)
83. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Ku, L.-W., Gui, C., Gelbukh, A.: A rule-based approach to aspectextraction from product reviews. In: COLING, Dublin, pp. 28–37 (2014)
84. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Winterstein, G., Huang, G.-B.: Sentic patterns: Dependency-basedrules for concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 45–63 (2014)
85. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Huang, G.-B.: EmoSenticSpace: A novelframework for affective common-sense reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems 69, 108–123(2014)
86. Rajagopal, D., Cambria, E., Olsher, D., Kwok, K.: A graph-based approach to commonsenseconcept extraction and semantic similarity detection. In: WWW, pp. 565–570. RioDe Janeiro (2013)
87. Ramirez, P.M., Mattmann, C.A.: Ace: improving search engines via automatic concept extraction.In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuseand Integration, IRI 2004, pp. 229–234. IEEE (2004)
88. Rao, D., Ravichandran, D.: Semi-supervised polarity lexicon induction. In: EACL, Athens,pp. 675–682 (2009)
89. Read, J.: Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentimentclassification. In: Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop, pp. 43–48.Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)
90. Rill, S., Reinel, D., Scheidt, J., Zicari, R.: Politwi: Early detection of emerging politicaltopics on twitter and the impact on concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-BasedSystems 69, 14–23 (2014)
91. Riloff, E., Wiebe, J.: Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In: Proceedingsof the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp.105–112 (2003)
92. Scaffidi, C., Bierhoff, K., Chang, E., Felker, M., Ng, H., Jin, C.: Red opal: product-featurescoring from reviews. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce,pp. 182–191. ACM (2007)
93. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J.Y., Chuang, J., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y., Potts, C.: Recursivedeep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank (2013)
94. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J., Ruppenhofer, J.: Discourse level opinion interpretation. In:COLING, Manchester, pp. 801–808 (2008)
95. Song, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Li, H., Chen, W.: Short text conceptualization using a probabilisticknowledgebase. In: IJCAI, Barcelona (2011)
96. Sriram, B., Fuhry, D., Demir, E., Ferhatosmanoglu, H., Demirbas, M.: Short text classificationin twitter to improve information filtering. In: Proceedings of the 33rd InternationalACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp.841–842. ACM (2010)
97. Stevenson, R., Mikels, J., James, T.: Characterization of the affective norms for englishwords by discrete emotional categories. Behavior Research Methods 39, 1020–1024 (2007)
98. Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., Qin, B.: Learning sentiment-specificwordembedding for twitter sentiment classification (2014)
99. Titov, I., McDonald, R.: Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In: Proceedingsof the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 111–120. ACM(2008)
100. Tsur, O., Davidov, D., Rappoport, A.: Icwsm-a great catchy name: Semi-supervised recognitionof sarcastic sentences in online product reviews. In: ICWSM (2010)
101. Turney, P.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classificationof reviews. In: ACL, Philadelphia, pp. 417–424 (2002)
102. Turney, P., Littman, M.: Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientationfrom association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 21(4), 315–346 (2003)
103. Velardi, P., Fabriani, P., Missikoff, M.: Using text processing techniques to automaticallyenrich a domain ontology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontologyin Information Systems, vol. 2001, pp. 270–284. ACM (2001)
104. Velikovich, L., Goldensohn, S., Hannan, K., McDonald, R.: The viability of web-derivedpolarity lexicons. In: NAACL, Los Angeles, pp. 777–785 (2010)
105. Wang, F., Wang, Z., Li, Z., Wen, J.-R.: Concept-based short text classification and ranking.In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Informationand Knowledge Management, pp. 1069–1078. ACM (2014)
106. Wang, H., Lu, Y., Zhai, C.: Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: a rating regressionapproach. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference onKnowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 783–792. ACM (2010)
107. Wang, T., Cai, Y., Leung, H.-F., Lau, R.Y.K., Li, Q.: Huaqing Min. Product aspect extractionsupervised with online domain knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems 71, 86–100 (2014)
108. Wiebe, J., Riloff, E.: Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unannotatedtexts. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Linguistics andIntelligent Text Processing, pp. 486–497 (2005)
109. Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Cardie, C.: Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2), 165–210 (2005)
110. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentimentanalysis. In: HLT/EMNLP, Vancouver (2005)
111. Yang, C., Lin, K.H., Chen, H.-H.: Emotion classification using web blog corpora. In: IEEE/WIC/ACMInternational Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 275–278. IEEE (2007)
112. Yuntao, Z., Ling, G., Yongcheng, W., Zhonghang, Y.: An effective concept extractionmethod for improving text classification performance. Geo-Spatial Information Science6(4), 66–72 (2003)
113. Zhao W.X., Jiang, J., Yan, H., Li, X.: Jointly modeling aspects and opinions with a maxentldahybrid. In: EMNLP, pp. 56–65. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)
114. Zheng, J.H., Lu, J.L.: Study of an improved keywords distillation method. Computer Engineering 31(18), 194–196 (2005)