Learning document-level semantic properties from free-text annotations

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Volumn 34, Issue , 2009, Pages 569-603

  Branavan, S R K ^a   Chen, Harr ^a   Eisenstein, Jacob ^a   Barzilay, Regina ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EXPERT ANNOTATIONS; HIERARCHICAL BAYESIAN MODELING; KEYPHRASE ANNOTATIONS; LATENT TOPIC MODEL; MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS; ON-LINE CONTENTS; PARAPHRASE STRUCTURES; SEMANTIC PROPERTIES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 71449127258     PISSN: 10769757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1613/jair.2633     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barzilay, R., McKeown, K., & Elhadad, M. (1999). Information fusion in the context of multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 550–557.
2. Barzilay, R., & McKeown, K. R. (2001). Extracting paraphrases from a parallel corpus. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 50–57.
3. Bhattacharya, I., & Getoor, L. (2006). A latent Dirichlet model for unsupervised entity resolution. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining.
4. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2006). Correlated Topic Models. In Advances in NIPS, pp. 147–154.
5. Blei, D. M., & McAuliffe, J. (2008). Supervised topic models. In Advances in NIPS, pp. 121–128.
6. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
7. Boyd-Graber, J., Blei, D., & Zhu, X. (2007). A topic model for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1024–1033.
8. Branavan, S. R. K., Chen, H., Eisenstein, J., & Barzilay, R. (2008). Learning document-level semantic properties from free-text annotations. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 263–271.
9. Carbonell, J., & Goldstein, J. (1998). The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pp. 335–336.
10. Chinchor, N. (1995). Statistical significance of MUC-6 results. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Message Understanding, pp. 39–43.
11. Chinchor, N., Lewis, D. D., & Hirschman, L. (1993). Evaluating message understanding systems: An analysis of the third message understanding conference (MUC-3). Computational Linguistics, 19(3), 409–449.
12. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
13. Dagan, I., Glickman, O., & Magnini, B. (2006). The PASCAL recognising textual entailment challenge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3944, 177–190.
14. Elhadad, N., & McKeown, K. R. (2001). Towards generating patient specific summaries of medical articles. In Proceedings of NAACL Workshop on Automatic Summarization, pp. 32–40.
15. Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., & Manning, C. (2005). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 363–370.
16. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis (2nd edition). Texts in Statistical Science. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
17. Goldwater, S., Griffiths, T. L., & Johnson, M. (2006). Contextual dependencies in unsupervised word segmentation. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 673–680.
18. Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of SIGKDD, pp. 168–177.
19. Joachims, T. (1999). Making Large-Scale Support Vector Machine Learning Practical, pp. 169–184. MIT Press.
20. Kim, S.-M., & Hovy, E. (2006). Automatic identification of pro and con reasons in online reviews. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL, pp. 483–490.
21. Lin, D., & Pantel, P. (2001). Discovery of inference rules for question-answering. Natural Language Engineering, 7(4), 343–360.
22. Liu, B., Hu, M., & Cheng, J. (2005). Opinion observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In Proceedings of WWW, pp. 342–351.
23. Lu, Y., & Zhai, C. (2008). Opinion integration through semi-supervised topic modeling. In Proceedings of WWW, pp. 121–130.
24. Mani, I., & Bloedorn, E. (1997). Multi-document summarization by graph search and matching. In Proceedings of AAAI, pp. 622–628.
25. Marsi, E., & Krahmer, E. (2005). Explorations in sentence fusion. In Proceedings of the European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 109–117.
26. McCallum, A., Bellare, K., & Pereira, F. (2005). A conditional random field for discriminatively-trained finite-state string edit distance. In Proceedings of UAI, pp. 388–395.
27. Nenkova, A., Vanderwende, L., & McKeown, K. (2006). A compositional context sensitive multi-document summarizer: exploring the factors that influence summarization. In Proceedings of SIGIR, pp. 573–580.
28. Noreen, E. (1989). Computer-Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction. John Wiley and Sons.
29. Popescu, A.-M., Nguyen, B., & Etzioni, O. (2005). OPINE: Extracting product features and opinions from reviews. In Proceedings of HLT/EMNLP, pp. 339–346.
30. Purver, M., Körding, K. P., Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2006). Unsupervised topic mod-elling for multi-party spoken discourse. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL, pp. 17–24.
31. Radev, D., Jing, H., & Budzikowska, M. (2000). Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents: Sentence extraction, utility-based evaluation and user studies. In Proceedings of ANLP/NAACL Summarization Workshop.
32. Radev, D., & McKeown, K. (1998). Generating natural language summaries from multiple on-line sources. Computational Linguistics, 24(3), 469–500.
33. Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336), 846–850.
34. Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press.
35. Riezler, S., & Maxwell, J. T. (2005). On some pitfalls in automatic evaluation and significance testing for MT. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization, pp. 57–64.
36. Snyder, B., & Barzilay, R. (2007). Multiple aspect ranking using the good grief algorithm. In Proceedings of NAACL/HLT, pp. 300–307.
37. Titov, I., & McDonald, R. (2008a). A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 308–316.
38. Titov, I., & McDonald, R. (2008b). Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In Proceedings of WWW, pp. 111–120.
39. Toutanova, K., & Johnson, M. (2008). A Bayesian LDA-based model for semi-supervised part-of-speech tagging. In Advances in NIPS, pp. 1521–1528.
40. White, M., Korelsky, T., Cardie, C., Ng, V., Pierce, D., & Wagstaff, K. (2001). Multi-document summarization via information extraction. In Proceedings of HLT, pp. 1–7.
41. Yeh, A. (2000). More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of COLING, pp. 947–953.
42. Zaenen, A. (2006). Mark-up barking up the wrong tree. Computational Linguistics, 32(4), 577–580.