Microblogging as a mechanism for human-robot interaction

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 64-77

  Bell, David ^b   Koulouri, Theodora ^b   Lauria, Stanislao ^b   Macredie, Robert D ^b   Sutton, James ^a  

^a IBM   (United States)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Architectures for social robotics; Computational intelligence for knowledge; Human robot interfaces; Social media retrieval; Twitter

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DIGITAL DEVICES; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; ROBOTS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

ACQUISITION; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERFACE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL ROBOTICS; TWITTER; BI-DIRECTIONAL COMMUNICATION; MICRO-BLOGGING PLATFORMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; QUESTION ANSWERING;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84924551344     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. J. Benedek, T. Miner, Measuring desirability: new methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting, Proc. Usab. Prof. Assoc. (2002) 8-12.
2. S. Bird, E. Loper, E. Klein, Natural Language Processing with Python O'Reilly Media Inc., 2009.
3. S. Bovair, D.E. Kieras, Toward a model of acquiring procedures from text, Handbook Read. Res. 2 (1991) 206-229.
4. J. Brooke, SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale, Usab. Eval. Ind. 189 (1996) 194.
5. E. Cambria, B. White, Jumping NLP curves: a review of natural language processing research, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 9 (2014) 2.
6. J.R. Carlson, R.W. Zmud, Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions, Acad. Manage. J. 42 (2) (1999) 153-170.
7. H.H. Clark, Using Language, Cambridge University Press, New York, US, 1996.
8. W. Corvey, S. Vieweg, T. Rood, M. Palmer, Twitter in mass emergency: what NLP techniques can contribute, in: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, pp 23-24.
9. K.D. Dent, S.A. Paul, Through the twitter glass: detecting questions in microtext, in: Analyzing Microtext, 2011.
10. V. Dufour-Lussier, F. Le Ber, J. Lieber, E. Nauer, Automatic case acquisition from texts for process-oriented case-based reasoning, Inform. Syst. (2012).
11. J. Dunn, Twitter Statistics You May Not Knowedudemic.com/2012/12/14-twitter-statistics-you-may-not-know, 2012.
12. J. Foster, O. Cetinoglu, J. Wagner, J. Le Roux, S. Hogan, J. Nivre, J. Van Genabith, #hardtoparse: POS tagging and parsing the twitterverse, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Analyzing Microtext AAAI 2011, 2011, pp. 20-25.
13. G.J. Funke, S.M. Galster, W.T. Nelson, A. Dukes, Instant messaging and team performance in a simulated command and control environment, in: General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems Dayton OH, 2006.
14. F. Ganier, Cognitive models of processing procedural instructions, Commun. Technol. 10 (2012) 39.
15. K. Gimpel, N. Schneider, B. O'Connor, D. Das, D. Mills, J. Eisenstein, N.A. Smith, Part-of-speech tagging for twitter: annotation, features, and experiments, in: Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa School of Computer Science, 2010.
16. P.D. Harper, K.L. Norman, Improving user satisfaction: the questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction version 5.5, in: The 1st Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, Virginia Beach, VA, 1993, pp. 224-228.
17. K.S. Hone, R. Graham, Towards a tool for the subjective assessment of speech system interfaces (SASSI), Natural Lang. Eng. 6 (3 and 4) (2000) 287-303.
18. Y. Hu, K. Talamadupula, S. Kambhampati, Dude, srsly?: the surprisingly formal nature of twitter's language, in: Proceedings of ICWSM, 2013.
19. ISO 9241-11:1998. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on Usability.
20. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, B. Tseng, Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities, in: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop on Web Mining and Social Network Analysis, ACM, 2007, pp. 56-65.
21. P. Jordan, Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to The New Human Factors, CRC Press, 2000.
22. C. Kidd, C. Breazeal, Comparison of social presence in robots and animated characters, in: Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (CHI), 2005.
23. J. Kirakowski, The software usability measurement inventory: background and usage, Usab. Eval. Ind. (1996) 169-178.
24. N. Kock, Media naturalness and compensatory encoding: the burden of electronic media obstacles is on senders, Decis. Support Syst. 44 (2007) 175-187.
25. T. Koulouri, S. Lauria, R.D. Macredie, S. Chen, Are we there yet?: the role of gender on the effectiveness and efficiency of user-robot communication in navigational tasks, ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. (TOCHI) 19 (1) (2012) 4.
26. J. Kwahk, S.H. Han, A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products, Appl. Ergonom. 33 (5) (2002) 419-431.
27. S. Lauria, G. Bugmann, T. Kyriacou, J. Bos, E. Klein, Training personal robots using natural language instruction, IEEE Intell. Syst. 16 (5) (2001) 38-45.
28. Lauwers, T. (2010) Aligning Capabilities of Interactive Educational Tools to Learner Goals, ERIC.
29. J.R. Lewis, IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7 (1) (1995) 57-78.
30. H.X. Lin, Y.Y. Choong, G. Salvendy, A proposed index of usability: a method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems, Behav. Inform. Technol. 16 (4-5) (1997) 267-277.
31. H. Liu, P. Singh, ConceptNet-a practical commonsense reasoning tool-kit, BT Technol. J. 22 (4) (2004) 211-226.
32. R.J. Logan, Behavioral and emotional usability: Thomson consumer electronics, in: Usability in Practice, Academic Press Professional Inc., 1994, pp. 59-82.
33. X. Ma, X. Yang, S. Zhao, C. Fu, Z. Lan, Y. Pu, Robots in my contact list: using social media platforms for human-robot interaction in domestic environment, in: APCHI12, Proceedings of the 10th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp. 133-140.
34. B. Martinovsky, D. Traum, The error is the clue: breakdown in human-machine interaction, in: ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems, 2003.
35. C. Nass, Y. Moon, Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers, J. Soc. Issues 56 (1) (2000) 81-103.
36. D.A. Norman, The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, 1988.
37. S. Petrovic, M. Osborne, V. Lavrenko, Streaming first story detection with application to twitter, in: NAACL '10: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
38. M. Rhoads, Face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: what does theory tell us and what have we learned so far?, J Plan. Lit. 25 (2) (2010) 111-122.
39. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, Y. Matsuo, Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors, in: www '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 851-860.
40. J. Sauro, J.R. Lewis, Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: evidence for the construct of usability, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2009, pp. 1609-1618.
41. M. Schumacher, M. Minor, K. Walter, R. Bergmann, Extraction of procedural knowledge from the web: a comparison of two work extraction approaches, in: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, www '12 Companion, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp. 739-747.
42. H. Shi, T. Tenbrink, Telling Rolland where to go: HRI dialogues on route navigation, in: Spatial Language and Dialogue, Oxford University Press, 2009.
43. G. Skantze, Exploring human error recovery strategies: implications for spoken dialogue systems, Speech Commun. 45 (3) (2005) 207-359.
44. B. Sriram, D. Fuhry, E. Demir, H. Ferhatosmanoglu, M. Demirbas, Short text classification in twitter to improve information filtering, in: Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development In Information Retrieval, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 841-842.
45. C. Tagtmeier, Facebook vs. twitter. (Cover story), Comput. Libr. 30 (2010) 6-10.
46. T. Tenbrink, S. Winter, Variable granularity in route directions, Spatial Cognit. Comput. 9 (1) (2009) 64-93.
47. Y. Tuchin, A. Gal, S. Wasserkrug, Tuning complex event processing rules using prediction correction paradigm, in: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, 2009.
48. S. Whittaker, Theories and methods in mediated communication, The Handbook of Discourse Processes, 2003, pp. 243-286.