Safety risk modeling and major accidents analysis of hydrogen and natural gas releases: A comprehensive risk analysis framework

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 40, Issue 39, 2015, Pages 13653-13663

  Mohammadfam, Iraj ^a   Zarei, Esmaeil ^a,b  

^a HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b HAMADAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Consequence; HAZOP; Hydrogen safety; QRA; Risk assessment; Risk modeling

Indexed keywords

EXPLOSIONS; GAS PRODUCERS; HAZARDS; HEALTH RISKS; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK PERCEPTION; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

CONSEQUENCE; HAZOP; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PLANT; HYDROGEN SAFETY; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION; QUALITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MODEL;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84942505710     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.117     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. N. Ozalp Energy and material flow models of hydrogen production in the US Chemical Industry Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 19 2008 5020 5034
2. M.J. Jafari, E. Zarei, and N. Badri The quantitative risk assessment of a hydrogen generation unit Int J Hydrogen Energy 37 24 2012 19241 19249
3. P. Hoffmann Tomorrow's energy: hydrogen, fuel cells, and the prospects for a cleaner planet 2002 MIT Press Cambridge
4. E. Zarei, M.J. Jafari, and N. Badri Risk assessment of vapor cloud explosions in a hydrogen production facility with consequence modeling J Res Health Sci 13 2 2013 181 187
5. U.S Department of Energy Hydrogen incident reporting and lessons learned web site 2013 [Cited 3 May, 2013]; Available from: http://www.h2incidents.org/
6. Fotis Rigas, and P. Amyotte Hydrogen safety (Green chemistry and chemical engineering) 2012 CRC Press, Taylor & Frances Group
7. S. Kikukawa, H. Mitsuhashi, and A. Miyake Risk assessment for liquid hydrogen fueling stations Int J Hydrogen Energy 34 2009 1135 1141
8. S. Kikukawa, F. Yamaga, and H. Mitsuhashi Risk assessment of hydrogen fueling stations for 70 MPa FCVs Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 7129 7136
9. E. Kim, K. Lee, J. Kim, Y. Lee, J. Park, and I. Moon Development of Korean hydrogen fueling station codes through risk analysis Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 13122 13131
10. H.J. Pasman, and W.J. Rogers Risk assessment by means of Bayesian networks: a comparative study of compressed and liquefied H2 transportation and tank station risks Int J Hydrogen Energy 37 2012 17415 17425
11. K. Sun, X. Pan, Z. Li, and J. Ma Risk analysis on mobile hydrogen refueling stations in Shanghai Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 2014 20411 20419
12. A. Rodionov, H. Wilkening, and P. Moretto Risk assessment of hydrogen explosion for private car with hydrogen-driven engine Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 2398 2406
13. 2 refuelling station using the ADREA-HF code Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 2573 2581
14. S. Kikukawa Consequence analysis and safety verification of hydrogen fueling stations using CFD simulation Int J Hydrogen Energy 33 2008 1425 1434
15. A.G. Venetsanos, E. Papanikolaou, and J.G. Bartzis The ADREA-HF CFD code for consequence assessment of hydrogen applications Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 3908 3918
16. L.I. Zhiyong, P.A.N. Xiangmin, and M.A. Jianxin Quantitative risk assessment on 2010 Expo hydrogen station Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 4079 4086
17. L. Zhiyong, P. Xiangmin, and M. Jianxin Quantitative risk assessment on a gaseous hydrogen refueling station in Shanghai Int J Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 6822 6829
18. A. Al-shanini, A. Ahmad, and F. Khan Accident modelling and safety measure design of a hydrogen station Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 2014 20362 20370
19. G.P. Haugom, and P. Friis-Hansen Risk modelling of a hydrogen refuelling station using Bayesian network Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 2389 2397
20. H.J. Pasman Challenges to improve confidence level of risk assessment of hydrogen technologies Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 2407 2413
21. G. Shirali, M. Motamedzade, I. Mohammadfam, V. Ebrahimipour, and A. Moghimbeigi Challenges in building resilience engineering (RE) and adaptive capacity: a field study in a chemical plant Process Saf Environ Prot 90 2012 83 90
22. G.A. Shirali, I. Mohammadfam, and V. Ebrahimipour A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach: a case study in a process industry Reliab Eng Syst Saf 119 2013 88 94
23. A. Dormohammadi, E. Zarei, M.B. Delkhosh, and A. Gholami Risk analysis by means of a QRA approach on a LPG cylinder filling installation Process Saf Prog 33 1 2014 77 84
24. P.-K. Marhavilas, D. Koulouriotis, and V. Gemeni Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: on a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000-2009 J Loss Prev Process Ind 24 5 2011 477 523
25. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis 2nd ed. 2000 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) New York
26. 2 J Hazard Mater 274 0 2014 164 172
27. Det Norske Veritas H2 release and jet dispersion-validation of PHAST and KFX, Report for DNV research CT1910. DNV Energy 2008
28. H.W. Witlox, and A. Oke Verification and validation of consequence models for accidental releases of hazardous chemicals to the atmosphere SERIES: Institution of Chemical Engineers 2008
29. H.W. Witlox, and A. Oke Verification and validation of consequence and risk models for accidental releases of hazardous chemicals to the atmosphere Process Safety Technical Exchange Meeting 2007
30. N.A. Eisenberg, C.J. Lynch, and R.J. Breeding Vulnerability model. A simulation system for assessing damage resulting from marine spills DTIC Document 1975
31. E. Zarei, M. Jafari, A. Dormohammadi, and V. Sarsangi The role of modeling and consequence evaluation in improving safety level of industrial hazardous installations: a case study: hydrogen production unit Iran Occup Health 10 6 2013 54 69
32. OGP Risk assessment data directory, process release frequencies, report No. 434-1 International association of oil and gas procedures 2010
33. M.J. Jafari, I. Mohammadfam, and E. Zarei Analysis and simulation of severe accidents in a steam methane reforming plant Int J Occu Hyg 6 3 2014 120 130
34. N. Badri, F. Nourai, and D. Rashtchian The role of quantitative risk assessment in improving hazardous installations siting: a case study Iran J Chem Chem Eng 30 2011
35. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach Reliab Eng Syst Saf 104 2012 36 44
36. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, and V. Cozzani Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks Risk Anal 33 2013 292 306
37. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, and P. Amyotte Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 2011 925 932
38. N. Khakzad, F. Khan, P. Amyotte, and V. Cozzani Risk management of domino effects considering dynamic consequence analysis Risk Anal 34 2014 1128 1138
39. A. Azadeh, and I. Mohammadfam A framework for development of integrated intelligent human engineering environment Inf Technol J 5 2006 290 299
40. I. Mohammadfam, A. Azadeh, M. Faridan, and H. Mahjub Safety behaviors assessment in process industry: a case study in gas refinery J Chin Inst Ind Eng 25 2008 298 305