Quantitative risk assessment integrated with process simulator for a new technology of methanol production plant using recycled CO2

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 274, Issue , 2014, Pages 164-172

  Di Domenico, Julia ^a   Vaz Jr , Carlos André ^a   de Souza Jr , Maurício Bezerra ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Consequence estimation; Design; Methanol synthesis; Quantitative risk assessment; Simulation

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; METHANOL; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; RECYCLING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIMULATORS; SYNTHESIS GAS MANUFACTURE;

CONSEQUENCE ESTIMATION; METHANOL SYNTHESIS; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; METHANOL;

CARBON DIOXIDE; DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; INNOVATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; METHANOL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECYCLING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SOFTWARE;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DANGEROUS GOODS; HIGH TEMPERATURE; HYDROGENATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT; PRESSURE; RECYCLING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CHEMICAL HAZARD RELEASE; METHANOL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RECYCLING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84899580082     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.02.045     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. CCPS Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis 2000, Centre for Chemical Process Safety, American for Chemical Engineers, New York. second ed.
2. Ale B.J.M., Uijt De Haag P.A.M. Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment, Purple Book 2005, Ministry of VROM, The Hague, Netherlands. third ed.
3. Cetesb Environmental Company of São Paulo State, São Paulo 2003, Available at: http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br (accessed 03.04.12).
4. Papazoglou I.A., Christou M., Nivolianitou Z., Aneziris O. On the management of severe chemical accidents DECARA: a computer code for consequence analysis in chemical installations. Case study: ammonia plant. J. Hazard. Mater. 1992, 31:135-153.
5. Papazoglou I.A., Nivolianitou Z., Aneziris O., Christou M. Probabilistic safety analysis in chemical installations. J. Loss Prevent. Proc 1992, 3:181-191.
6. Marhavilas P.K., Koulouriotis D.E. A risk-estimation methodologiacal framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents' data: application in an aluminium extrusion industry. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 2008, 21:596-603.
7. Marhavilas P.K., Koulouriotis D.E. Developing a new alternative risk assessment framework in the work sites by including a stochastic and deterministic process: a case study for the Greek Public Electric Power Provider. J.Safety Sci. 2012, 50:448-462.
8. Khakzad N., Khan F., Amyotte P. Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: a Bayesian approach. Safety Sci. 2013, 57:108-117.
9. Abuswera M., Amyotte P., Khan F. A quantitative risk management framework for dust and hybrid mixture explosions. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 2013, 26:283-289.
10. Pasman H., Reniers G. Past, present and future of quantitative risk assessment (QRA) and the incentive it obtained from land-use planning (LUP). J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 2014, 28:2-9.
11. Shariff A.M., Leong C.T. Inherent risk assessment - a new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage. Proc. Saf. Environ. Protect. 2009, 87:371-376.
12. Üçtug F.G., Agrali S., Arikan Y., Avcioglu E. Deciding between carbon trading and carbon capture and sequestration: an optimisation-based case study for methanol synthesis from syngas. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 132:1-8.
13. 2 hydrogenation. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 57:38-45.
14. Fan L., Sakaiya Y., Fujimoto K. Low-temperature methanol synthesis from carbon dioxide and hydrogen via formic ester. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 1999, 180:L11-L13.
15. 2 para Produção de Metanol: Avaliação de Rotas Alternativas de Produção 2010, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
16. IBGE Brazilian Institute of Geology 2012, Available at: http://www.ibge.gov.br (accessed on 28.09.12).
17. INMET Meteorological Institute 2012, Available at: http://www.inmet.gov.br/portal/ (accessed on 28.09.12).
18. Mannan S. Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Hazard Identification Assessment and Control 2004, vol. 1. Butterworth-Heinemann, Texas, United States. third ed.
19. 4-air lean mixtures in a vented multi-compartment environment. Energy 2005, 30:1439-1451.
20. Darbra R.M., Casal J. Historical analysis of accidents in seaports 2004, Department of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalunya, Spain.
21. Standard practice for system safety (MIL-STD-882D), Department of Defense, United States, 2000.
22. Reference Manual Bevi Risk Assessment - RIVM, rev. 3.2, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Holthe, Netherlands, 2009.
23. Vasconcelos F.M. Uma Aplicação da Técnica de Análise de Camadas de Proteção (LOPA) na Avaliação do Risco do Sistema de Hidrogênio de Refrigeração do Gerador Elétrico Principal de uma Usina Nuclear 2008, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
24. Eisenberg N.A. Vulnerability model. A simulation system for assessing damage resulting from marine spills 1975, Report No. CG-D-38-79.
25. Crowl D.A., Louvar J.F. Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Application 2011, Prentice Hall International Series in the Physical and Chemical Engineering Sciences, Boston, United States. third ed.
26. Khan F.I., Abasi S.A. Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 1998, 11:261-277.