Hydrogen safety

Hydrogen Safety

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-264

  Rigas, Fotis ^a   Amyotte, Paul ^b  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055826800     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (426)

1. Cherry, R.S., A hydrogen utopia? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 125, 2004.
2. Akansu, S.O., Dulger, Z., Kahraman, N., and Veziroglu, T.N., Internal combustion engines fueled by natural gas: hydrogen mixtures, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 1527, 2004.
3. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Evaluation of hazards associated with hydrogen storage facilities, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30, 1501, 2005.
4. Momirlan, M., and Veziroglu, T.N., Current status of hydrogen energy, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6, 141, 2002.
5. EUR 22002, Introducing Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research Sustainable Energy Systems, 2006.
6. Schulte, I., Hart, D., and van der Vorst, R., Issues affecting the acceptance of hydrogen fuel, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29, 677, 2004.
7. Dincer, I., Technical, environmental and exergetic aspects of hydrogen energy systems, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 27, 265, 2002.
8. European Economic Community, On the Control of Major-Accident Hazards Involving Dangerous Substances, Directive 96/82/EC, Brussels, 1996.
9. Kirchsteiger, C., Availability of community level information on industrial risks in the EU. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78, 81, 2000.
10. Institute of Chemical Engineers, Accident Database (CD form), Loughborough, U.K., 1997.
11. Taylor, J.R., Risk Analysis for Process Plants, Pipelines and Transport, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994, 102.
12. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1992, 69.
13. Guy, K.W.A., The hydrogen economy, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78 (4), 324–327, 2000.
14. Kletz, T., and Amyotte, P., Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
15. Jordan, T., Adams, P., Azkarate, I., Baraldi, D., Barthelemy, H., Bauwens, L., Bengaouer, A., Brennan, S., Carcassi, M., Dahoe, A., Eisenrich, N., Engebo, A., Funnemark, E., Gallego, E., Gavrikov, A., Haland, E., Hansen, A.M., Haugom, G.P., Hawksworth, S., Jedicke, O., Kessler, A., Kotchourko, A., Kumar, S., Langer, G., Stefan, L., Lelyakin, A., Makarov, D., Marangon, A., Markert, F., Middha, P., Molkov, V., Nilsen, S., Papanikolaou, E., Perrette, L., Reinecke, E.-A., Schmidtchen, U., Serre-Combe, P., Stocklin, M., Sully, A., Teodorczyk, A., Tigreat, D., Venetsanos, A., Verfondern, K., Versloot, N., Vetere, A., Wilms, M., and Zaretskiy, N., Achievements of the EC Network of Excellence HySafe, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2656–2665, 2011.
16. Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Hydrogen Safety, German Hydrogen Association, Brussels, 18–21, 2002.
17. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Hydrogen safety, in Hydrogen Fuel: Production, Transport and Storage, R. Gupta (Ed.), CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2008, 537–538.
18. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Evaluation of hazards associated with hydrogen storage facilities, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30, 1501–1510, 2005.
19. Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE), Accident Database (CD form), Loughborough, U.K., 1997.
20. Rosyid, O.A. System-Analytic Safety Evaluation of the Hydrogen Cycle for Energetic Utilization, Dissertation, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany, 2006.
21. Khan, F.I., and Abbasi, S.A., Major accidents in process industries and an analysis of causes and consequences, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 12, 361–378, 1999.
22. Bethea, R.M. Explosion and Fire at Pasadena, Texas, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1996.
23. Ministère chargé de l’environnement, France, Explosion dans une unité de craquage d’une raffinerie, No 19423, 2000.
24. Center for Chemical Process Safety. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1992, 69.
25. Warren, P. Hazardous Gases and Fumes, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1997, 96.
26. Zuettel, A., Borgschulte, A., and Schlapbach, L. (Eds.), Hydrogen as a Future Energy Carrier, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2008, 14–20.
27. Hord, J. Is hydrogen a safe fuel? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 3, 157, 1978.
28. Kirchsteiger, C., Vetere Arellano, A.L., and Funnemark, E., Towards establishing an international hydrogen incidents and accidents database (HIAD) Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20, 98, 2007.
29. Zuettel, A., Borgschulte, A., and Schlapbach, L. (Eds.), Hydrogen as a Future Energy Carrier, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2008, Chap. 4.
30. Sullivan, N.S., Zhou, D., and Edwards, C.M., Precise and efficient in situ ortho–para-hydrogen converter, Cryogenics, 30, 734, 1990.
31. Yucel, S., Theory of ortho-para conversion in hydrogen adsorbed on metal and paramagnetic surfaces at low temperatures, Physics Review B, 39, 3104, 1989.
32. ANSI, Guide to Safety of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, American National Standard ANSI/AIAA G-095-2004, Chap. 2.
33. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Hydrogen safety, in Hydrogen Fuel: Production, Transport and Storage, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2008, Chap. 16.
34. Adamson, K.A., and Pearson, P., Hydrogen and methanol: a comparison of safety, economics, efficiencies and emissions, Journal of Power Sources, 86, 548, 2000.
35. Karim, A., Hydrogen as a spark ignition engine fuel, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 28, 569, 2003.
36. Hord, J., Is hydrogen a safe fuel? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 3, 157, 1978.
37. Baker, W.E., and Tang, M.J., Gas, Dust and Hybrid Explosions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991, 42.
38. Rosyid, A., and Hauptmanns, U., System analysis: safety assessment of hydrogen cycle for energetic utilization, in Proc. Int. Congr. Hydrogen Energy and Exhibition, Istanbul, 2005.
39. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fundamentals and Use of Hydrogen as a Fuel, 3rd ed., Vol. 4, Wiley, New York, 1992.
40. Wolfram Alpha, Computational Knowledge Engine, http://wolframalpha.com.
41. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Evaluation of hazards associated with hydrogen storage facilities, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30, 1501–1510, 2005.
42. Gordon, S., and McBride, B.J., Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications, NASA Reference Publication 1311, 1994.
43. Fact Sheet Series No. 1.008, “Hydrogen Safety,” National Hydrogen Association, Washington, D.C.
44. ANSI, Guide to Safety of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, American National Standard ANSI/AIAA G-095-2004, 2004, Chap. 2.
45. Zuettel, A., Borgschulte, A., and Schlapbach, L. (Eds.), Hydrogen as a Future Energy Carrier, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2008, Chap. 4.
46. MedicineNet.com, http://www.medterms.com.
47. LaChance, J., Tchouvelev, A., and Engebo, A., Development of uniform harm criteria for use in quantitative risk analysis of the hydrogen infrastructure, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2381, 2011.
48. Methods for the determination of possible damage. In CPR 16E. The Netherlands Organization of Applied Scientific Research, 1989.
49. Eisenberg, N.A., et al. Vulnerability Model: A Simulation System for Assessing Damage Resulting from Marine Spills, Final Report SA/A-015 245, U.S. Coast Guard, 1975.
50. Tsao, C.K., and Perry, W.W., Modifications to the Vulnerability Model: A Simulation System for Assessing Damage Resulting from Marine Spills, Report ADA 075 231, U.S. Coast Guard, 1979.
51. Opschoor, G., van Loo, R.O.M., and Pasman, H.J., Methods for calculation of damage resulting from physical effects of the accidental release of dangerous materials. International Conference on Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, Human Factors, and Human Reliability in Process Safety. Orlando, Florida, January 15–17, 1992.
52. Lees, F.P., The assessment of major hazards: a model for fatal injury from burns, Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, 72 (Part B), 127–134, 1994.
53. Jeffries, R.M., Hunt, S.J., and Gould, L., Derivation of probability of fatality function for occupant buildings subject to blast loads, Health & Safety Executive, Contract Research Report 147, 1997.
54. Guidelines for Use of Hydrogen Fuel in Commercial Vehicles, DOT F 1700.7, Report No. FMCSA-RRT-07-020, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2007.
55. ANSI, Guide to Safety of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, American National Standard ANSI/AIAA G-095-2004, Chap. 3.
56. Chandler, W.T., and Walter, R.J., Testing to determine the effect of high pressure hydrogen environments on the mechanical properties of metals, in Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing, ASTM 543, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1974, 170.
57. Groenvald, T. D. and Elcea, A. D. Hydrogen Stress Cracking in Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines. Hydrogen in Metals: Proceedings of an International Conference on the Effects of Hydrogen on Materials Properties and Selection of Structural Design, I. M. Bernstein and A. W. Thompson, Eds., ASM International, September, 1973.
58. Rowe, M.D., Nelson, T.W., and Lippold, J.C., Hydrogen-induced cracking along the fusion boundary of dissimilar metal welds, Welding Research, February 1999, 31.
59. Zalosh, R.G., and Short, T.P., Compilation and Analysis of Hydrogen Accident Reports, C00-4442-4, Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Factory Mutual Research Corp., Norwood, 1978.
60. Williams, G.P., Causes of ammonia plant shutdowns, Chemical Engineering Progress, 74, 9, 1978.
61. Ordin, P.M., A review of hydrogen accidents and incidents in NASA operations, in 9th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1974.
62. Thompson, J.D., and Enloe, J.D., Flammability limits of hydrogen-oxygen-nitrogen mixtures at low pressures, Combustion and Flame, 10(4), 393–394, 1996.
63. Fisher, M., Safety aspects of hydrogen combustion in hydrogen energy systems, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 11(9), 593–601, 1986.
64. McHale, E.T., Geary, G., von Elbe, G., and Huggett, C., Flammability limits of H2-O2-fluorocarbon mixtures, Combustion and Flame, 16, 167, 1971.
65. Creitz, E.C., Inhibition of diffusion flames by methyl bromide and trifluoromethyl-bromide applied to the fuel and oxygen sides of the reaction zone. Journal of Research for Applied Physics and Chemistry, 65, 389, 1961.
66. Wionsky, S.G., Predicting flammable material classifications, Chemical Engineering, 79, 81, 1972.
67. Beach, R., Preventing static electricity fires, Chem. Eng., 71, 73, 1964.
68. Beach, R., Preventing static electricity fires, Chem. Eng., 72, 63, 1965a.
69. Beach, R., Preventing static electricity fires, Chem. Eng., 72, 85, 1965b.
70. FM Approval CN 5700 – Approval Standard for Explosion Suppression Systems, FM Approvals, Norwood, Massachusetts, 2002.
71. Baker, W.E., and Tang, M.J., Gas, Dust and Hybrid Explosions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991, 42.
72. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires, and BLEVEs, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1994.
73. Lide, D.R., Ed., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 75th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Chap. 6, 1994.
74. Salla, J.M., Demichela, M., and Casal, J., BLEVE: A new approach to the superheat limit temperature, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19, 690, 2006.
75. Bjerketvedt, D., Bakke, J.R., and Wingerden, K.V., Gas explosion handbook. Journal of Hazardous Material, 52, 1, 1997.
76. Philips, H., Explosions in the Process Industries, Institute of Chemical Engineers, Warwickshire, U.K., 1994, 5.
77. Lee, J. H. et al., Hydrogen-air detonations, in Proc. 2nd International Workshop on the Impact of Hydrogen on Water Reactor Safety, M. Berman, Ed., SAND82-2456, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1982.
78. Gordon, S., and McBride, B.J., Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications, NASA Reference Publication 1311, 1994.
79. Bull, D.C., Ellworth, J.E., and Shiff, P.J., Detonation cell structures in fuel/air mixtures, Combustion and Flame, 45, 7, 1982.
80. Explosion Protection Specification, Kidde Fire Protection, Oxfordshire, U.K. http://www.kfp.co.uk/utcfs/ws-438/Assets/IEP%20Explosion%20Protection%20Data%20Sheet.PDF.
81. U.S. DOT, Clean Air Programme – Use of Hydrogen to Power the Advanced Technology Transit Bus (ATTB): An Assessment. Report DOT-FTA-MA-26-0001-97-1, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., 1997.
82. European Industrial Gases Association, Safety in Storage. Handling and Distribution of Liquid Hydrogen, Report DOC 06/02/E, 2002.
83. Lee, J., Initiation of gaseous detonation, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 28, 75, 1977.
84. Eichert, H., Hydrogen-air deflagrations and detonations: numerical calculation of 1-d tube combustion processes, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 12, 171, 1987.
85. Choi, Y.S., Lee, U.J., Lee, J.J., and Park, G.C., Improvement of HYCA3D code and experimental verification in rectangular geometry, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 226, 337, 2003.
86. Lee, S.D., Suha, K.Y., and Jae, M., A framework for evaluating hydrogen control and management, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 82, 307, 2003.
87. Tromp, T.K., Shia, R.L., Allen, M., Eiler, J.M., and Yung, Y.L., Potential environmental impact of a hydrogen economy on the stratosphere, Science, June 13, 2003, 1740–1742. DOI: 10.1126/science.1085169.
88. Walt Pyle, Hydrogen Storage, Home Power, 59, 14–15, June/July, 1997.
89. WolframAlpha, Computational Knowledge Engine (http://www.wolframalpha.com).
90. Verfondern, K., Safety Considerations on Liquid Hydrogen, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Energy and Environment, Vol. 10, 2008, pp. 25–27.
91. Tzimas, E., Filiou, C., Peteves, S.D., and Veyret, J.B., Hydrogen Storage: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspective, European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre, Petten, The Netherlands, 2003.
92. Warren, P., Hazardous Gases and Fumes, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1997, p. 96.
93. CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety), Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions, Flash Fires and BLEVEs, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1994, p. 158.
94. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Evaluation of hazards associated with hydrogen storage facilities, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30, 1501, 2005.
95. D.R. Lide, Ed., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 75th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Chap. 6, 1994.
96. Shebeko, Yu. N., Shevchuck, A.P., and Smolin, I.M., BLEVE prevention using vent devices, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 50, 227, 1996.
97. Sklavounos, S., and Rigas, F., Advanced multi-perspective computer simulation as a tool for reliable consequence analysis, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 90(2), 129, 2012.
98. Pohanish, R.P., and Green, S.A., Rapid Guide to Chemical Incompatibilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1997, p. 434.
99. Carson, P., and Mumford, C., Hazardous Chemicals Handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1994, pp. 181, 202.
100. Taylor, J.R., Risk Analysis for Process Plant, Pipelines and Transport, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994, p. 102.
101. CCPS, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1992, p. 69.
102. HSE (Health and Safety Executive), Application of QRA in Operational Safety Studies, Health and Safety Executive report 025, 2002, p. 19.
103. LLNL (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), Burro Series Data Report, LLNL/NWC report UCID-19075 Vol. 1, LLN, Berkeley, CA, 1982.
104. Versteeg, H.K., and Malalasekera, W., An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, Longman, New York, 1995, p. 85.
105. Sklavounos, S., and Rigas, F., Validation of turbulence models in heavy gas dispersion over obstacles, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 108, 9, 2004.
106. Sklavounos, S., and Rigas, F., Fuel gas dispersion under cryogenic release conditions, Energy and Fuels, 19, 2535, 2005.
107. LLNL, Description and Analysis of Burro Series 40-m3 LNG Spill Experiments, LLNL/NWC report No. UCRL-53186, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 1981.
108. Witcofski, R.D., and Chirivella, J.E., Experimental and analytical analyses of the mechanisms governing the dispersion of flammable clouds formed by liquid hydrogen spills, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 9, 425, 1984.
109. Venetsanos, A.G., and Bartzis, J.G., CFD modeling of large-scale LH2 spills in open environment, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32, 2171, 2007.
110. Venetsanos, A.G., Papanikolaou, E., and Bartzis, J.G., The ADREA-HF CFD code for consequence assessment of hydrogen applications, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 3908, 2010.
111. Swain, M.R. et al., Hydrogen leakage into simple geometric enclosures, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 28, 229, 2003.
112. Venetsanos, A.G., Papanikolaou E., Delichatsios, M., Garcia, J., Hansen, O.R., Heitsch, M., Huser, A., Jahn, W., Jordan, T., Lacome, J.M., Ledin, H.S., Makarov, D., Middha P., Studer, E., Tchouvelev, A.V., Teodorczyk, A., Verbecke, F., and Van der Voort, M.M., An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 5912, 2009.
113. Papanikolaou, E., Venetsanos, A.G., Heitsch, M., Baraldi, D., Huser, A., Pujol, J., Garcia, J., and Markatos, N., HySafe SBEP-V20: Numerical studies of release experiments inside a naturally ventilated residential garage, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 4747, 2010.
114. Zhang, J., Delichatsios, M.A., and Venetsanos, A.G., Numerical studies of dispersion and flammable volume of hydrogen enclosures, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 6431, 2010.
115. FDS—Fire Dynamics Simulator, available from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) at: http://fire.nist.gov/fds.
116. Papanikolaou, E., Venetsanos, A.G., Cerchiara, G.M., Carcassi, M., and Markatos, N., CFD simulations on small hydrogen releases inside a ventilated facility and assessment of ventilation efficiency, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2597, 2011.
117. Venetsanos, A.G., Adams, P., Azkarate, I., Bengaouer, A., Brett, L., Carcassi, M.N., Engebø, A., Gallego, E., Gavrikov, A.I., Hansen, O.R., Hawksworth, S., Jordan, T., Kesslerm, A., Kumar, S., Molkov, V., Nilsen, S., Reinecke, E., Stoecklin, M., Schmidtchen, U., Teodorczyk, A., Tigreat, D., and Versloot, N.H.A., On the use of hydrogen in confined spaces: Results from the internal project InsHyde, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2693, 2011.
118. Pula R., Khan, F., Veitsch, B., and Amyotte, P., Revised fire consequence models for off-shore quantitative risk assessment, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18, 443, 2005.
119. Sklavounos, S., and Rigas, F., Simulation of Coyote series trials, Part I: CFD estimation of non-isothermal LNG releases and comparison with box-model predictions, Chem. Eng.Sci., 61, 1434, 2006.
120. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Simulation of Coyote series trials – Part II: a computational approach to ignition and combustion of flammable vapor clouds, Chemical Engineering Science, 61, 1434, 2006.
121. LLNL, Coyote Series Data Report, UCID: 19953 Vol. 1, 2. LLNL/NWC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 1983.
122. LLNL, Vapor Burn Analysis for the COYOTE series LNG spill Experiments, UCID: 53530, LLNL/NWC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 1984.
123. Zhai, X., Ding, S., Cheng, Y., Jin, Y., and Cheng, Y., CFD simulation with detailed chemistry of steam reforming of methane for hydrogen production in an integrated micro-reactor, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 5383, 2010.
124. Dou, B., and Song, Y., A CFD approach on simulation of hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol in a fluidized bed reactor, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 10271, 2010.
125. Baraldi, D., Kotchourko, A., Lelyakin, A., Yanez, J., Gavrikov, A., Efimenko, A., Verbecke, F., Makarov, D., Molkov, V., and Teodorczyk, A., An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to simulate hydrogen deflagrations with pressure relief vents, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 12381, 2010.
126. Pasman, H.J., and Groothuisen, Th.M., Design of pressure relief vents. In Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, edited by C.H. Bushman, Elsevier, New York, 1974, pp. 185–189.
127. Baraldi, D., Heitsch, M., and Wilkening, H., CFD simulations of hydrogen combustion in a simplified EPR containment with CFX and REACFLOW, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, 1668, 2007.
128. Redlinger, R., DET3D-ACFD tool for simulating hydrogen combustion in nuclear reactor safety, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 238, 610, 2008.
129. Dorofeev, S.B., Kuznetsov, M.S., Alekseev, V.I., Efimenko, A.A., and Breitung, W., Evaluation of limits for effective flame acceleration in hydrogen mixtures, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 14, 583, 2001.
130. Xiong, J., Yang, Y., and Cheng, X., CFD application to hydrogen risk analysis, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2009, doi: 1155/2009/213981.
131. Heitsch, M., Huhtanen, R., Techy, Z., Fry, C., and Kostka, P., CFD evaluation of hydrogen risk mitigation measures in a VVER-440/213 containment, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 240, 385, 2010.
132. Prabhudharwadkar, D.M., and Iyer, K.N., Simulation of hydrogen mitigation in catalytic recombiner, Part II: Formulation of a CFD model, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 241, 1758, 2011.
133. Ferng, Y.M., and Chen, C.T., CFD investigating thermal-hydraulic characteristics and hydrogen generation from graphite-water reaction after SG tube rupture in HTR-10 reactor, Applied Thermal Engineering, 31, 2430, 2011.
134. Kletz, T.A., What you don’t have, can’t leak. Chemistry and Industry, May 1978, 287–292.
135. Markert, F., Nielsen, S.K., Paulsen, J.L., and Andersen, V., Safety aspects of future infrastructured scenarios with hydrogen refuelling stations, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32, 2227, 2007.
136. U.S. Department of Transportation, Guidelines for Use of Hydrogen Fuel in Commercial Vehicles, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, November 2007.
137. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Evaluation of hazards associated with hydrogen storage facilities, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30, 1501, 2005.
138. Hord, J., Is hydrogen a safe fuel? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 3, 157, 1978.
139. Swain, M.R., Shriber, J., and Swain, M.N., Comparison of hydrogen, natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, and gasoline leakage in a residential garage, Energy and Fuels, 12, 83, 1998.
140. Farrell, A.E., Keith, D.W., and Corbett, J.J., A strategy for introducing hydrogen into transportation, Energy Policy, 31, 1357, 2003.
141. Zalosh, R., CNG and Hydrogen Vehicle Fuel Tank Failure Incidents. Testing, and Preventive Measures, Technical Support and Evaluation of the Fuel Tank Tests; Recommendations for Research Priorities of Hydrogen Fueled Vehicles, Motor Vehicle Fire Research Institute, 2008.
142. Zalosh, R., and Weyandt, N., “Hydrogen Fuel Tank Fire Exposure Burst Test,” SAE Paper No. 2005-01-1886, 2005.
143. Weyandt, N., “Intentional Failure of a 5000 psig Hydrogen Cylinder Installed in an SUV without Standard Required Safety Devices,” SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0431, 2007.
144. Zalosh, R., “Blast Waves and Fireballs Generated by Hydrogen Fuel Tank Rupture During Fire Exposure,” Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, Edinburgh, UK, April 23–27, 2007.
145. Baker, W., Kulesz, J., Ricker, R., Westine, P., Parr, V., Vargas, L., and Mosely, P., “Workbook for Estimating Effects of Accidental Explosions in Propellant Ground Handling and Transport Systems,” NASA CR 3023, August 1978.
146. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd edition, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 2000.
147. Stephenson, R., “Crash-induced Fire Safety Issues with Hydrogen-Fueled Vehicles,” Presented at National Hydrogen Association’s 18th Annual U.S. Hydrogen Conference, Washington, D.C., March 2003.
148. Swain, M.R., Fuel leak simulation, in Proceedings of the 2001 DOE Hydrogen Program Review, NREL/CP-570-30535, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
149. Wu, Y., Assessment of the impact of jet flame hazard from hydrogen cars in road tunnels, Transportation Research Part C, 16, 246, 2008.
150. Venetsanos, A.G., Baraldi, D., Adams, P., Heggem, P.S., and Wilkening, H., CFD modeling of hydrogen release, dispersion and combustion for automotive scenarios, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21, 162, 2008.
151. Middha, P., and Hansen, O.R., CFD simulation study to investigate the risk from hydrogen vehicles in tunnels, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 5875, 2009.
152. Baraldi, D., Kotchourko, A., Lelyakin, A., Yanez, J., Middha, P., Hansen, O.R., Gavrikov, A., Efimenko, A., Verbecke, F., Makarov, D., and Molkov, V., An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to simulate hydrogen deflagrations in a tunnel, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 7862, 2009.
153. SAE International, Technical information report J2579, January 2009.
154. Makarov, D., and Molkov, V., “Modelling of dispersion following hydrogen permeation for safety engineering and risk assessment,” Presented at II International Conference: “Hydrogen Storage Technologies,” Moscow, Russia, October 28–29, 2009.
155. Adams, P., Bengaouer, A., Cariteau, B., Molkov, V., and Venetsanos, A.G., Allowable hydrogen permeation rate from road vehicles, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2742, 2011.
156. Clark, W.W., Rifkin, J., O’Connor, T., Swisher, J., Lipman, T., and Rambach, G., Hydrogen energy stations: Along the roadside to the hydrogen economy, Utilities Policy, 13, 41, 2005.
157. Kikukawa, S., Consequence analysis and safety verification of hydrogen fueling stations using CFD simulation, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33, 1425, 2008.
158. Baraldi, D., Venetsanos, A.G., Papanikolaou, E., Heitsch, M., and Dallas, V., Numerical analysis of release, dispersion and combustion of liquid hydrogen in a mock-up hydrogen refuelling station, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22, 303, 2009.
159. Makarov, D., Verbecke, F., Molkov, V., Roe, O., Skotenne, M., Kotchourko, A., Lelyakin, A., Yanez, J., Hansen, O., Middha, P., Ledin, S., Baraldi, D., Heitsch, M., Efimenko, A., and Gavrikov, A., An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to predict a hydrogen explosion in a simulated vehicle refuelling environment, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34, 2800, 2009.
160. Papanikolaou, E., Venetsanos, A.G., Schiavetti, M., Marangon, A., Carcassi, M., and Markatos, N., Consequence assessment of the BBC H2 refuelling station using the ADREA-HF code, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2573, 2011.
161. Ham, K., Marangon, A., Middha, P., Versloot, N., Rosmuller, N., Carcassi, M., Hansen, O.R., Schiavetti, M., Papanikolaou, E, Venetsanos, A., Engebo, A, Saw, J.L, Saffers, J.B, Flores, A, and Serbanescu, D., Benchmark exercise on risk assessment methods applied to a virtual hydrogen refueling station, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2666, 2011.
162. Amyotte, P.R., MacDonald, D.K., and Khan, F.I., An analysis of CSB investigation reports for inherent safety learnings, Paper No. 44a, Proceedings of 13th Process Plant Safety Symposium, 7th Global Congress on Process Safety (AIChE 2011 Spring National Meeting), Chicago, IL (March 13–16, 2011).
163. CCPS, Inherently Safer Chemical Processes. A Life Cycle Approach, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2009.
164. Kletz, T., and Amyotte, P., Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design, 2nd edition, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
165. Khan, F.I., and Amyotte, P.R., How to make inherent safety practice a reality, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 81 (1), 2–16, 2003.
166. Hendershot, D.C., A summary of inherently safer technology, Process Safety Progress, 29 (4), 389–392, 2010.
167. Crowl, D.A., and Jo, Y.-D., The hazards and risks of hydrogen, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20 (2), 158–164, 2007.
168. Markert, F., Nielsen, S.K., Paulsen, J.L., and Andersen, V., Safety aspects of future infrastructure scenarios with hydrogen refuelling stations, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (13), 2227–2234, 2007.
169. General Hydrogen Corporation, Material Safety Data Sheet: Compressed Hydrogen, Washington, PA (undated).
170. Hydrogen Association, Hydrogen Safety, Fact Sheet Series (undated).
171. Molkov, V., Hydrogen Safety Research: State-of-the-Art, Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, Edinburgh, UK (April 23–27, 2007).
172. Miller, M., Hydrogen Fueling Stations, Institute of Transportation Studies (November 15, 2004).
173. Pasman, H.J., and Rogers, W.J., Safety challenges in view of the upcoming hydrogen economy: An overview, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (6), 697–704, 2010.
174. Roads2HyCom, Hydrogen Safety Measures, Document Tracking ID 5031, www.roads2hy.com (March 30, 2011).
175. HySafe, Chapter V: Hydrogen Safety Barriers and Safety Measures, Biennial Report on Hydrogen Safety, Version 1.0 (May 2006).
176. Groethe, M., Merilo, E., Colton, J., Chiba, S., Sato, Y., and Iwabuchi, H., Large-scale hydrogen deflagrations and detonations, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (13), 2125–2133, 2007.
177. Benard, P., Mustafa, V., and Hay, D.R., Safety assessment of hydrogen disposal on vents and flare stacks at high flow rates, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 24 (5), 489–495, 1999.
178. Astbury, G.R., Venting of low pressure hydrogen gas: A critique of the literature, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 85 (4), 289–304, 2007.
179. Wald, M.L., and Pollack, A., Core of stricken reactor probably leaked, U.S. says, New York Times (April 6, 2011).
180. Tabuchi, H., Bradsher, K., and Wald, M.L., In Japan reactor failings, danger signs for the U.S., New York Times (May 17, 2011).
181. Alsheyab, M., Jiang, J.-Q., and Stanford, C., Risk assessment of hydrogen gas production in the laboratory scale electrochemical generation of ferrate (VI), Journal of Chemical Health & Safety, 15 (5), 16–20, 2008.
182. CSB, Urgent Recommendations from Kleen Energy Investigation, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
183. Bradsher, K., Pressing ahead where others have failed, New York Times (March 24, 2011).
184. Sherman, D., At milepost 1 on the hydrogen highway, New York Times (April 29, 2007).
185. Guy, K.W., The hydrogen economy, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78 (4), 324–327, 2000.
186. Motavalli, J., A universe of promise (and a tankful of caveats), New York Times (April 29, 2007).
187. Leary, W.E., Use of hydrogen as fuel is moving closer to reality, New York Times (April 16, 1995).
188. Leary, W.E., With shuttle back in space, NASA returns to leak problem, New York Times (October 9, 1990).
189. Rainer, D., Hydrogen, Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 15 (4), 49–50, 2008.
190. Middha, P., Engel, D., and Hansen, O.R., Can the addition of hydrogen to natural gas reduce the explosion risk? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2628–2636, 2011.
191. Yang, J.C., Material-based hydrogen storage, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33 (16), 4424–4426, 2008.
192. Xu, P., Zheng, J., Liu, P., Chen, R., Kai, F., and Li, L., Risk identification and control of stationary high-pressure hydrogen storage vessels, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (6), 950–953, 2009.
193. Janssen, H., Bringmann, J.C., Emonts, B., and Schroeder, V., Safety-related studies on hydrogen production in high-pressure electrolysers, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29 (7), 759–770, 2004.
194. CSB, Positive Material Verification: Prevent Errors During Alloy Steel Systems Maintenance, Safety Bulletin, No. 2005-04-B, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
195. Segal, L., Wallace, J.S., and Keffer, J.F., Safety considerations in the design of a gaseous hydrogen fuel supply for engine testing, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 11 (11), 737–743, 1986.
196. Matthijsen, A.J.C.M., and Kooi, E.S., Safety distances for hydrogen filling stations, Fuel Cells Bulletin, 2006 (11), 12–16, 2006.
197. Dorofeev, S.B., Evaluation of safety distances related to unconfined hydrogen explosions, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (13), 2118–2124, 2007.
198. Marangon, A., Carcassi, M., Engebo, A., and Nilsen, S., Safety distances: Definition and values, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (13), 2192–2197, 2007.
199. Khan, F.I., and Amyotte, P.R., How to make inherent safety practice a reality, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 81 (1), 2–16, 2003.
200. Khan, F.I., Sadiq, R., and Amyotte, P.R., Evaluation of available indices for inherently safer design options, Process Safety Progress, 22 (2), 83–97, 2003.
201. Etowa, C.B., Amyotte, P.R., Pegg, M.J., and Khan, F.I., Quantification of inherent safety aspects of the Dow indices, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15 (6), 477–487, 2002.
202. Edwards, D.W., and Lawrence, D., Assessing the inherent safety of chemical process routes, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 71 (B4), 252–258, 1993.
203. Edwards, D.W., Rushton, A.G., and Lawrence, D., Quantifying the inherent safety of chemical process routes, Paper presented at the 5th World Congress of Chemical Engineering, San Diego, CA (July 14-18, 1996).
204. Khan, F.I., and Amyotte, P.R., Integrated Inherent Safety Index (I2SI): A tool for inherent safety evaluation, Process Safety Progress, 23 (2), 136–148, 2004.
205. Khan, F.I., and Amyotte, P.R., I2SI: A comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18 (4–6), 310–326, 2005.
206. Carvalho, A., Gani, R., and Matos, H., Design of sustainable chemical processes: Systematic retrofit analysis generation and evaluation of alternatives, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 86 (5), 328–346, 2008.
207. Hurme, M., and Rahman, M., Implementing inherent safety throughout process lifecycle, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18 (4–6), 238–244, 2005.
208. Rahman, M., Heikkila, A.-M., and Hurme, M., Comparison of inherent safety indices in process concept evaluation, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18 (4–6), 327–334, 2005.
209. Hassim, M.H., and Hurme, M., Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (1), 127–138, 2010.
210. Hassim, M.H., and Hurme, M., Inherent occupational health assessment during basic engineering stage, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (2), 260–268, 2010.
211. Hassim, M.H., and Hurme, M., Inherent occupational health assessment during preliminary design stage, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (3), 476–482, 2010.
212. Hassim, M.H., and Hurme, M., Occupational chemical exposure and risk estimation in process development and design, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 88 (4), 225–235, 2010.
213. Hassim, M.H., and Edwards, D.W., Development of a methodology for assessing inherent occupational health hazards, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 84 (5), 378–390, 2006.
214. Gupta, J.P., and Edwards, D.W., A simple graphical method for measuring inherent safety, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 104 (1–3), 15–30, 2003.
215. Cozzani, V., Barontini, F., and Zanelli, S., Assessing the inherent safety of substances: Precursors of hazardous products in the loss of control of chemical systems, in Proceedings of American Institute of Chemical Engineers Spring National Meeting (2006).
216. Landucci, G., Tugnoli, A., Nicolella, C., and Cozzani, V., Assessment of Inherently Safer Technologies for Hydrogen Storage, IChemE Symposium Series No. 153, in 12th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, Edinburgh, UK, 2007.
217. Landucci, G., Tugnoli, A., Nicolella, C., and Cozzani, V., Assessment of inherently safer technologies for hydrogen production, in Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, Edinburgh, UK (April 23–27, 2007).
218. Landucci, G., Tugnoli, A., and Cozzani, V., Inherent safety key performance indicators for hydrogen storage systems, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 159 (2–3), 554–566, 2008.
219. Tugnoli, A., Landucci, G., and Cozzani, V., Key performance indicators for inherent safety: Application to the hydrogen supply chain, Process Safety Progress, 28 (2), 156–170, 2009.
220. Landucci, G., Tugnoli, A., and Cozzani, V., Safety assessment of envisaged systems for automotive hydrogen supply and utilization, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35 (3), 1493–1505, 2010.
221. Cordella, M., Tugnoli, A., Barontini, F., Spadoni, G., and Cozzani, V., Inherent safety of substances: Identification of accidental scenarios due to decomposition products, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (4), 455–462, 2009.
222. Shariff, A.M., Rusli, R., Leong, C.T., Radhakrishnan, V.R., and Buang, A., Inherent safety tool for explosion consequences study, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19 (5), 409–418, 2006.
223. Leong, C.T., and Shariff, A.M., Inherent Safety Index Module (ISIM) to assess inherent safety level during preliminary design stage, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 86 (2), 113–119, 2008.
224. Leong, C.T., and Shariff, A.M., Process Route Index (PRI) to assess level of explosiveness for inherent safety quantification, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (2), 216–221, 2009.
225. Shariff, A.M., and Leong, C.T., Inherent risk assessment: A new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 87 (6), 371–376, 2009.
226. Shariff, A.M., and Zaini, D., Toxic release consequence analysis tool (TORCAT) for inherently safer design plant, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182 (1–3), 394–402, 2010.
227. Rusli, R., and Shariff, A.M., Qualitative assessment for inherently safer design (QAISD) at preliminary design stage, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (1), 157–165, 2010.
228. Kossoy, A., and Akhmetshin, Yu., Simulation-Based Approach to Design of Inherently Safer Processes, IChemE Symposium Series No. 153, in 12th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, Edinburgh, UK, 2007.
229. Shah, S., Fischer, U., and Hungerbuhler, K., A hierarchical approach for the evaluation of chemical process aspects from the perspective of inherent safety, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81 (6), 430–443, 2003.
230. Adu, I.K., Sugiyama, H., Fischer, U., and Hungerbuhler, K., Comparison of methods for assessing environmental, health and safety (EHS) hazards in early phases of chemical process design, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 86 (3), 77–93, 2008.
231. Palaniappan, C., Srinivasan, R., and Halim, I., A material-centric methodology for developing inherently safer environmentally benign processes, Computers and Chemical Engineering, 26 (4–5), 757–774, 2002.
232. Palaniappan, C., Srinivasan, R., and Tan, R., Expert system for the design of inherently safer processes, Part 1: Route selection stage, Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 41 (26), 6698–6710, 2002.
233. Palaniappan, C., Srinivasan, R., and Tan, R., Expert system for the design of inherently safer processes, Part 2: Flowsheet development stage, Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 41 (26), 6711–6722, 2002.
234. Srinivasan, R., and Nhan, N.T., A statistical approach for evaluating inherent benignness of chemical process routes in early design stages, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 86 (3), 163–174, 2008.
235. Srinivasan, R., and Kraslawski, A., Application of the TRIZ creativity enhancement approach to design of inherently safer chemical processes, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 45 (6), 507–514, 2006.
236. Meel, A., and Seider, W.D., Dynamic risk assessment of inherently safe chemical processes: Accident precursor approach, Presented at American Institute of Chemical Engineers Spring National Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2005.
237. Gentile, M., Rogers, W.J., and Mannan, M.S., Development of a fuzzy logic-based inherent safety index, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81 (6), 444–456, 2003.
238. Al-Mutairi, E.M., Suardin, J.A., Mannan, S.M., and El-Halwagi, M.M., An optimization approach to the integration of inherently safer design and process scheduling, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21 (5), 543–549, 2008.
239. Edwards, D.W., Are we too risk-averse for inherent safety? An examination of current status and barriers to adoption, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 83 (2), 90–100, 2005.
240. New integrated management system attempts to link environment, health, safety and process management, Workplace Environment Health & Safety Reporter, 7 (1), 1166, 2001.
241. Amyotte, P.R., and McCutcheon, D.J., Risk Management: An Area of Knowledge for all Engineers, Discussion paper prepared for Canadian Council of Professional Engineers, Ottawa, Ontario, 2006.
242. Kletz, T., and Amyotte, P., Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design, 2nd edition, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
243. Amyotte, P.R., and Oehmen, A.M., Application of a loss causation model to the Westray mine explosion, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 80 (1), 55–59, 2002.
244. DOE, Hydrogen Safety, Technical Plan – Safety; Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan, U.S. Department of Energy, pp. 3.8-1–3.8-12, 2007.
245. Stelmakowich, A., Continuous improvement, OHS Canada, 19 (7), 38–39, 2003.
246. Creedy, G., Process Safety Management, PowerPoint presentation prepared for Process Safety Management Division, Chemical Institute of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2004.
247. Bird, F.E., and Germain, G.L., Practical Loss Control Leadership, DNV, Loganville, GA, 1996.
248. Guy, K.W.A., The hydrogen economy, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78 (4), 324–327, 2000.
249. DOE, Safety Planning Guidance for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Projects, Fuel Cell Technologies Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., 2010.
250. Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering, Process Safety Management, 3rd edition, Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, 2002.
251. CCPS, Guidelines for Technical Management of Chemical Process Safety, Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1989.
252. CCPS, Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
253. Amyotte, P.R., Goraya, A.U., Hendershot, D.C., and Khan, F.I., Incorporation of inherent safety principles in process safety management, Process Safety Progress, 26 (4), 333–346, 2007.
254. Amyotte, P.R., MacDonald, D.K., and Khan, F.I., An analysis of CSB investigation reports concerning the hierarchy of controls, Process Safety Progress, 30, 261–265, 2011.
255. CSB, Positive Material Verification: Prevent Errors During Alloy Steel Systems Maintenance, Safety Bulletin, No. 2005-04-B, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
256. Griffiths, S., Leadership, Commitment & Accountability—The Driver of Safety Performance, Process Safety and Loss Management Symposium, 55th Canadian Chemical Engineering Conference, Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, 2005.
257. Hopkins, A., Safety, Culture and Risk: The Organizational Causes of Disasters, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
258. Mannan, M.S., Prem, K.P., and Ng, D., Challenges and needs for process safety in the new millennium, in Proceedings of 13th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, Vol. 1, Bruges, Belgium (June 6–9), 2010, pp. 5–13.
259. Creedy, G., private communication, 2005.
260. Sanders, R.E., Designs that lacked inherent safety: Case studies, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 104 (1–3), 149–161, 2003.
261. CSB, Refinery Explosion and Fire, Investigation Report, No. 2005-04-I-TX, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
262. Matthijsen, A.J.C.M., and Kooi, E.S., Safety distances for hydrogen filling stations, Fuel Cells Bulletin, No. 11, 12–16, 2006.
263. Crowl, D.A., and Jo, Y.-D., The hazards and risks of hydrogen, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20 (2), 158–164, 2007.
264. Takeno, K., Okabayashi, K., Kouchi, A., Nonake, T., Hashiguchi, K., and Chitose, K., Dispersion and explosion field tests for 40 MPa pressurized hydrogen, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (13), 2144–2153, 2007.
265. Gerboni, R., and Salvador, E., Hydrogen transportation systems: Elements of risk analysis, Energy, 34 (12), 2223–2229, 2009.
266. Pasman, H.J., and Rogers, W.J., Safety challenges in view of the upcoming hydrogen economy: An overview, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (6), 697–704, 2010.
267. CCPS, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 2nd edition, Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1992.
268. Knowlton, R.E., An investigation of the safety aspects in the use of hydrogen as a ground transportation fuel, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 9 (1–2), 129–136, 1984.
269. Kikukawa, S., Mitsuhashi, H., and Miyake, A., Risk assessment for liquid hydrogen fueling stations, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (2), 1135–1141, 2009.
270. Norsk Hydro ASA, and DNV, Risk Acceptance Criteria for Hydrogen Refuelling Stations, European Integrated Hydrogen Project (EIHP2), Contract: ENK6-CT2000-00442 (February 2003).
271. Brown, A.E.P., and Buchier, P.M., Hazard identification analysis of a hydrogen plant, Process Safety Progress, 18 (3), 166–169, 1999.
272. Rosyid, O.A., Jablonski, D., and Hauptmanns, U., Risk analysis for the infrastructure of a hydrogen economy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (15), 3194–3200, 2007.
273. Rodionov, A., Wilkening, H., and Moretto, P., Risk assessment of hydrogen explosion for private car with hydrogen-driven engine, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2398–2406, 2011.
274. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Evaluation of hazards associated with hydrogen storage facilities, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30 (13–14), 1501–1510, 2005.
275. Bernatik, A., and Libisova, M., Loss prevention in heavy industry: Risk assessment of large gasholders, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 17 (4), 271–278, 2004.
276. Kim, J., Lee, Y., and Moon, I., An index-based risk assessment model for hydrogen infrastructure, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (11), 6387–6398, 2011.
277. Petukhov, V.A., Naboko, I.M., and Fortov, V.E., Explosion hazard of hydrogen-air mixtures in the large volumes, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (14), 5924–5931, 2009.
278. Sommersel, O.K., Bjerketvedt, D., Vaagsaether, K., and Fannelop, T.K., Experiments with release and ignition of hydrogen gas in a 3 m long channel, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (14), 5869–5874, 2009.
279. Imamura, T., Mogi, T., and Wada, Y., Control of the ignition possibility of hydrogen by electrostatic discharge at a ventilation duct outlet, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (6), 2815–2823, 2009.
280. Moonis, M., Wilday, A.J., and Wardman, M.J., Semi-quantitative risk assessment of commercial scale supply chain of hydrogen fuel and implications for industry and society, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 88 (2), 97–108, 2010.
281. LaChance, J., Tchouvelev, A., and Engebo, A., Development of uniform harm criteria for use in quantitative risk analysis of the hydrogen infrastructure, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2381–2388, 2011.
282. Ramamurthi, K., Bhadraiah, K., and Murthy, S.S., Formation of flammable hydrogen-air clouds from hydrogen leakage, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (19), 8428–8437, 2009.
283. Haugom, G.P., and Friis-Hansen, P., Risk modelling of a hydrogen refuelling station using Bayesian network, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2389–2397, 2011.
284. MacIntyre, I., Tchouvelev, A.V., Hay, D.R., Wong, J., Grant, J., and Benard, P., Canadian hydrogen safety program, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (13), 2134–2143, 2007.
285. Middha, P., and Hansen, O.R., Using computational fluid dynamics as a tool for hydrogen safety studies, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (3), 295–302, 2009.
286. Middha, P., Hansen, O.R., and Storvik, I.E., Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (6), 1034–1038, 2009.
287. Makarov, D., Verbecke, F., Molkov, V., Roe, O., Skotenne, M., Kotchourko, A., Lelyakin, A., Yanez, J., Hansen, O., Middha, P., Ledin, S., Baraldi, D., Heitsch, M., Efimenko, A., and Gavrikov, A., An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to predict a hydrogen explosion in a simulated vehicle refuelling environment, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (6), 2800–2814, 2009.
288. Middha, P., and Hansen, O.R., CFD simulation study to investigate the risk from hydrogen vehicles in tunnels, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (14), 5875–5886, 2009.
289. Venetsanos, A.G., Papanikolaou, E., Delichatsios, M., Garcis, J., Hansen, O.R., Heitsch, M., Huser, A., Jahn, W., Jordan, T., Lacome, J.-M., Ledin, H.S., Makarov, D., Middha, P., Studer, E., Tchouvelev, A.V., Teodorczyk, A., Verbecke, F., and Van der Voort, M.M., An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (14), 5912–5923, 2009.
290. Baraldi, D., Kotchourko, A., Lelyakin, A., Yanez, J., Middha, P., Hansen, O.R., Gavrikov, A., Efimenko, A., Verbecke, F., Makarov, D., and Molkov, V., An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to simulate hydrogen deflagrations in a tunnel, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (18), 7862–7872, 2009.
291. Venetsanos, A.G., Papanikolaou, E., Hansen, O.R., Middha, P., Garcia, J., Heitsch, M., Baraldi, D., and Adams, P., HySafe standard benchmark problem SBEP-V11: Predictions of hydrogen release and dispersion from a CGH2 bus in an underpass, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35 (8), 3857–3867, 2010.
292. Garcia, J., Baraldi, D., Gallego, E., Beccantini, A., Crespo, A., Hansen, O.R., Hoiset, S., Kotchourko, A., Makarov, D., Migoya, E., Molkov, V., Voort, M.M., and Yanez, J., An intercomparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to reproduce a large-scale hydrogen deflagration in open atmosphere, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35 (9), 4435–4444, 2010.
293. Ham, K., Marangon, A., Middha, P., Versloot, N., Rosmuller, N., Carcassi, M., Hansen, O.R., Schiavetti, M., Papanikolaou, E., Venetsanos, A., Engebo, A., Saw, J.L, Saffers, J.-B., Flores, A., and Serbanescu, D., Benchmark exercise on risk assessment methods applied to a virtual hydrogen refuelling station, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2666–2677. 2011.
294. Venetsanos, A.G., Adams, P., Azkarate, I., Bengaouer, A., Brett, L., Carcassi, M.N., Engebo, A., Gallego, E., Gavrikov, A.I., Hansen, O.R., Hawksworth, S., Jordan, T., Kessler, A., Kumar, S., Molkov, V., Nilsen, S., Reinecke, E., Stocklin, M., Schnidtchen, U., Teodorczyk, A., Tigreat, D., and Versloot, N.H.A., On the use of hydrogen in confined spaces: Results from the internal project InsHyde, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2693–2699, 2011.
295. Hansen, M.D., and Gammel, G.W., Management of change: A key to safety—not just process safety, Professional Safety, 53 (10), 41–50, 2008.
296. EPA, Catastrophic Failure of Storage Tanks, Chemical Safety Alert, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 1997.
297. Alsheyab, M., Jiang, J.-Q., and Stanford, C., Risk assessment of hydrogen gas production in the laboratory scale electrochemical generation of ferrate (VI), Journal of Chemical Health & Safety, 15 (5), 16–20, 2008.
298. Xu, P., Zheng, J., Liu, P., Chen, R., Kai, F., and Li, L., Risk identification and control of stationary high-pressure hydrogen storage vessels, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (6), 950–953, 2009.
299. TEEX Developing Hydrogen Fuel Training Program, Occupational Health & Safety (April 24, 2011).
300. DiBerardinis, L.J. (Editor), Handbook of Occupational Safety and Health, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.
301. Felder, R.M., and Brent, R., Objectively speaking, Chemical Engineering Education, 31 (3), 178–179, 1997.
302. Goraya, A., Amyotte, P.R., and Khan, F.I., An inherent safety-based incident investigation methodology, Process Safety Progress, 23 (3), 197–205, 2004.
303. Frank, J., Observations on pre-emergency planning, Industrial Fire World (June 2007).
304. Hendershot, D.C., Process safety culture, Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 14 (3), 39–40, 2007.
305. Erickson, J.A., Corporate culture. Examining its effects on safety performance, Professional Safety, 53 (11), 35–38, 2008.
306. Antonsen, S., The relationship between safety culture and safety on offshore supply vessels, Safety Science, 47 (8), 1118–1128, 2009.
307. Hopkins, A., Thinking about Process Safety Indicators, Working Paper 53, National Research Centre for OHS Regulation, Australian National University (paper prepared for presentation at the Oil and Gas Industry Conference, Manchester, UK, November 2007).
308. Glendon, I., Safety culture and safety climate: How far have we come and where should we be heading? Journal of Occupational Health and Safety – Australia and New Zealand, 24 (3), 249–271, 2008.
309. Amyotte, P.R., and Eckhoff, R.K., Dust explosion causation, prevention and mitigation: An overview, Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 17 (1), 15–28, 2010.
310. Morozzo, C., Account of a Violent Explosion Which Happened in the Flour-Warehouse, at Turin, December the 14th, 1785; To Which Are Added Some Observations on Spontaneous Inflammations, From the Memoirs of the Academy of Sciences of Turin (London: The Repertory of Arts and Manufactures, 1795).
311. Amyotte, P.R., Are Classical Process Safety Concepts Relevant to Nanotechnology Applications? Nanosafe2010: International Conference on Safe Production and Use of Nanomaterials, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 304, 2011.
312. Hopkins, A. (Editor), Learning from High Reliability Organisations, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2009.
313. HySafe – Safety of Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier, http://www.hysafe.net/ (accessed August 4, 2011).
314. Jordan, T., Adams, P., Azkarate, I., Baraldi, D., Barthelemy, H., Bauwens, L., Bengaouer, A., Brennan, S., Carcassi, M., Dahoe, A., Eisenrich, N., Engebo, A., Funnemark, E., Gallego, E., Gavrikov, A., Haland, E., Hansen, A.M., Haugom, G.P., Hawksworth, S., Jedicke, O., Kessler, A., Kotchourko, A., Kumar, S., Langer, G., Stefan, L., Lelyakin, A., Makarov, D., Marangon, A., Markert, F., Middha, P., Molkov, V., Nilsen, S., Papanikolaou, E., Perrette, L., Reinecke, E.-A., Schmidtchen, U., Serre-Combe, P., Stocklin, M., Sully, A., Teodorczyk, A., Tigreat, D., Venetsanos, A., Verfondern, K., Versloot, N., Vetere, A., Wilms, M., and Zaretskiy, N., Achievements of the EC Network of Excellence HySafe, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2656–2665, 2011.
315. Jordan, T., HySafe – The Network of Excellence for Hydrogen Safety, WHEC 16, Lyon, France (June 13–16, 2006).
316. HySafe, 2004 – 2009: A Network of Excellence in the 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission, with 25 European Partners, HYSAFE – Safe Use of Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier (2007).
317. Molkov, V., Preface, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Special Issue on Hydrogen Safety, 21 (2), 129–130, 2008.
318. Dorofeev, S., Safety aspects of hydrogen as an energy carrier, Presented at 1st European Hydrogen Energy Conference, Grenoble, France (September 2–5, 2003).
319. KIT – Karlsruhle Institute of Technology, http://www.kit.edu/kit/english/index.php (accessed August 5, 2011).
320. Molkov, V., Hydrogen safety research: State-of-the-art, in Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, Edinburgh, UK (April 23–27, 2007).
321. Venetsanos, A.G., Papanikolaou, E., Delichatsios, M., Garcis, J., Hansen, O.R., Heitsch, M., Huser, A., Jahn, W., Jordan, T., Lacome, J.-M., Ledin, H.S., Makarov, D., Middha, P., Studer, E., Tchouvelev, A.V., Teodorczyk, A., Verbecke, F., and Van der Voort, M.M., An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (14), 5912–5923, 2009.
322. Venetsanos, A.G., Adams, P., Azkarate, I., Bengaouer, A., Brett, L., Carcassi, M.N., Engebo, A., Gallego, E., Gavrikov, A.I., Hansen, O.R., Hawksworth, S., Jordan, T., Kessler, A., Kumar, S., Molkov, V., Nilsen, S., Reinecke, E., Stocklin, M., Schnidtchen, U., Teodorczyk, A., Tigreat, D., and Versloot, N.H.A., On the use of hydrogen in confined spaces: Results from the internal project InsHyde, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2693–2699, 2011.
323. Baraldi, D., Kotchourko, A., Lelyakin, A., Yanez, J., Middha, P., Hansen, O.R., Gavrikov, A., Efimenko, A., Verbecke, F., Makarov, D., and Molkov, V., An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to simulate hydrogen deflagrations in a tunnel, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (18), 7862–7872, 2009.
324. Middha, P., and Hansen, O.R., CFD simulation study to investigate the risk from hydrogen vehicles in tunnels, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (14), 5875–5886, 2009.
325. Venetsanos, A.G., Papanikolaou, E., Hansen, O.R., Middha, P., Garcia, J., Heitsch, M., Baraldi, D., and Adams, P., HySafe standard benchmark problem SBEP-V11: Predictions of hydrogen release and dispersion from a CGH2 bus in an underpass, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35 (8), 3857–3867, 2010.
326. Garcia, J., Baraldi, D., Gallego, E., Beccantini, A., Crespo, A., Hansen, O.R., Hoiset, S., Kotchourko, A., Makarov, D., Migoya, E., Molkov, V., Voort, M.M., and Yanez, J., An intercomparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to reproduce a large-scale hydrogen deflagration in open atmosphere, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35 (9), 4435–4444, 2010.
327. Ham, K., Marangon, A., Middha, P., Versloot, N., Rosmuller, N., Carcassi, M., Hansen, O.R., Schiavetti, M., Papanikolaou, E., Venetsanos, A., Engebo, A., Saw, J.L, Saffers, J.-B., Flores, A., and Serbanescu, D., Benchmark exercise on risk assessment methods applied to a virtual hydrogen refuelling station, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2666–2677, 2011.
328. Dahoe, A.E., and Molkov, V.V., On the implementation of an international curriculum on hydrogen safety engineering into higher education, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21 (2), 222–224, 2008.
329. Amyotte, P.R., and McCutcheon, D.J., Risk Management: An Area of Knowledge for all Engineers, Discussion paper prepared for Canadian Council of Professional Engineers, Ottawa, Ontario, 2006.
330. Crowl, D.A., and Louvar, J.F., Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2011.
331. Kletz, T., and Amyotte, P., Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design, 2nd edition, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
332. Stuart, C., Hydrogen leak in Connecticut forces dozens from homes, New York Times (February 13, 2008).
333. Leary, W.E., Hopes rise on fixing shuttle leaks so the fleet can resume flying, New York Times (July 14, 1990).
334. Broad, W.J., Shuttle astronomy mission is postponed by fuel leak, New York Times (September 6, 1990).
335. Leary, W.E., Fuel leak delays launching of space shuttle, New York Times (April 5, 2002).
336. Hu, W., Leak at Indian Point 2 plant leads it to curtail operations, New York Times (September 12, 2002).
337. International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS), http://www.ichs2011.com/themestopics.htm (accessed August 17, 2011).
338. Sanders, R.E., Designs that lacked inherent safety: Case histories, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 104 (1–3), 149–161, 2003.
339. Weiner, S.C., Fassbender, L.L., and Quick, K.A., Using hydrogen safety best practices and learning from safety events, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (4), 2729–2735, 2011.
340. Kletz, T., What Went Wrong? Case Histories of Process Plant Disasters and How They Could Have Been Avoided, 5th edition, Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, UK, 2009.
341. Gupta, R.B. (Editor), Hydrogen Fuel: Production, Transport, and Storage, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2009.
342. Hopkins, A., Safety, Culture and Risk: The Organizational Causes of Disasters, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
343. Hopkins, A. (Editor), Learning from High Reliability Organisations, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2009.
344. Hydrogen Safety for Employees, http://www.safetyinstruction.com/hydrogen_safety_for_employees_power_point.htm (accessed August 18, 2011).
345. Brown McFarlane Case Studies, http://www.brownmac.com/media-downloads/case-studies /?ID=18 (accessed August 18, 2011).
346. U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program, http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/permitting/fueling_case_studies_washington.cfm (accessed August 18, 2011).
347. Sanderson, K., Explosion at ammonia plant, Chemistry World (June 1, 2006).
348. Evans, J., Weapons of mass degradation, Chemistry World (2011).
349. Ramsey, B., Big batteries? Big electric shock potential! Occupational Health & Safety, (February 1, 2004).
350. Carson, P., and Mumford, C., Batch reactor hazards and their control, Loss Prevention Bulletin, 171, 13–24, 2003.
351. Institute of Chemical Engineers (IChemE), http://www.icheme.org/sitecore/content/icheme_home/shop/searchresults.aspx?keywords=hydrogen&product=&CurrentPage=1&SortBy=Relevance&OrderBy=Asce (accessed August 18, 2011).
352. U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), http://www.csb.gov/ (accessed August 18, 2011).
353. U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), Positive Material Verification: Prevent Errors During Alloy Steel Systems Maintenance, Safety Bulletin, No. 2005-04-B, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
354. Litterick, D., Texas refinery fire inquiry critical of BP, The Telegraph (October 17, 2006).
355. Mahnken, G.E., Use case histories to energize your HAZOP, Chemical Engineering Progress, 73–78, 2001.
356. Khan, F.I., and Amyotte, P.R., How to make inherent safety practice a reality, Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 81 (1), 2–16, 2003.
357. Etowa, C.B., Amyotte, P.R., Pegg, M.J., and Khan, F.I., Quantification of inherent safety aspects of the Dow indices, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15 (6), 477–487, 2002.
358. West, A.S., Hendershot, D., Murphy, J.F., and Willey, R., Bhopal’s impact on the chemical industry, Process Safety Progress, 23 (4), 229–230, 2004.
359. Willey, R., Hendershot, D., and Berger, S., The accident in Bhopal: Observations 20 years later, Process Safety Progress, 26 (3), 180–184, 2007.
360. Louvar, J.F., Editorial. Bhopal, CCPS and 25 years, Process Safety Progress, 28 (4), 299, 2009.
361. Bhopal Memorial, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Bhopal-Union_Carbide_1.jpg (accessed September 8, 2011).
362. Amyotte, P.R., and Eckhoff, R.K., Dust explosion causation, prevention and mitigation: An overview, Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 17 (1), 15–28, 2010.
363. Richard, K.P., The Westray story: A predictable path to disaster, Report of the Westray Mine Public Inquiry, Province of Nova Scotia, Canada, 1997.
364. Sepeda, A.L., Lessons learned from process incident databases and the Process Safety Incident Database (PSID) approach sponsored by the Center for Chemical Process Safety, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130 (1–2), 9–14, 2006.
365. Gerboni, R., and Salvador, E., Hydrogen transportation systems: Elements of risk analysis, Energy, 34 (12), 2223–2229, 2009.
366. Imamura, T., Mogi, T., and Wada, Y., Control of the ignition possibility of hydrogen by electrostatic discharge at a ventilation duct outlet, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34 (6), 2815–2823, 2009.
367. Astbury, G.R., and Hawksworth, S.J., Spontaneous ignition of hydrogen leaks: A review of postulated mechanisms, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (13), 2178–2185, 2007.
368. Kirchsteiger, C., Vetere Arellano, A.L., and Funnemark, E., Towards establishing an International Hydrogen Incidents and Accidents Database (HIAD), Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20 (1), 98–107, 2007.
369. U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), http://www.csb.gov/assets/news/document/Final_Statement_6_3_2011.pdf (accessed September 8, 2011).
370. U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), http://www.csb.gov/assets/news/image/Photo_of_hole_in_hydrogen_piping.JPG (accessed September 8, 2011).
371. U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), http://www.csb.gov/assets/Investigation/original/Dust_photo.jpg (accessed September 8, 2011).
372. Chuyanov, V., and Topilski, L., Prevention of hydrogen and dust explosion in ITER, Fusion Engineering and Design, 81 (8–14), 1313–1319, 2006.
373. Denkevits, A., and Dorofeev, S., Explosibility of fine graphite and tungsten dusts and their mixtures, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19 (2–3), 174–180, 2006.
374. Denkevits, A., Explosibility of hydrogen-graphite dust hybrid mixtures, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20 (4–6), 698–707, 2007.
375. U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), Hydrogen Sulfide Poisoning, Investigation Report, No. 2002-01-I-AL, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
376. Contant, J., Guilty pleas in confined space deaths, OHS Canada, 27 (5), 6, 2011.
377. Crane Incident, http://farm1.static.flickr.com/34/103084821_c1066589e1_b.jpg (accessed September 8, 2011).
378. Basquin, S., and Smith, K., Hydrogen Gas Safety. Self-Study, Document No. ESH13-401-sb-8/00, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 2000.
379. Molkov, V., Hydrogen safety research: State-of-the-art, in Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, Edinburgh, UK (April 23–27, 2007).
380. HySafe – Safety of Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier, http://www.hysafe.net/ (accessed September 22, 2011).
381. Amyotte, P.R., Are Classical Process Safety Concepts Relevant to Nanotechnology Applications? Journal of Physics: Conference Series 304 (Nanosafe2010: International Conference on Safe Production and Use of Nanomaterials), 012071, 2011.
382. Hobbs, J., The Hydrogen Economy: Evaluation of the Materials Science and Engineering Issues, HSL/2006/59, Health and Safety Laboratory, Buxton, UK, 2005.
383. NASA, Safety Standard for Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Report NSS 1740.16, Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington, D.C., 1997.
384. Still, J.R., Understanding hydrogen failures, Welding Journal, American Welding Society (January 2004), http://www.aws.org.wj/jan04/still_feature.html (accessed September 22, 2011).
385. U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB), Positive Material Verification: Prevent Errors During Alloy Steel Systems Maintenance, Safety Bulletin, No. 2005-04-B, U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
386. Hopkins, A., Lessons from Longford. The Esso Gas Plant Explosion, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2000.
387. Smiyan, O.D., Grigorenko, G.M., and Vainman, A.B., Effect of hydrogen on corrosion damage of metal of the high-pressure energetic boiler drum, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 27 (7–8), 801–812, 2002.
388. Torres-Islas, A., Salinas-Bravo, V.M., Albarran, J.L., and Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J.G., Effect of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of X-70 pipeline steel in diluted NaHCO3 solutions at different heat treatments, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30 (12), 1317–1322, 2005.
389. Rogante, M., Battistella, P., and Cesari, F., Hydrogen interaction and stress-corrosion in hydrocarbon storage vessel and pipeline weldings, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31 (5), 597–601, 2006.
390. Nikiforov, A.V., Petrushina, I.M., Christensen, E., Tomas-Garcia, A.L., and Bjerrum, N.J., Corrosion behaviour of construction materials for high temperature steam electrolysers, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (1), 111–119, 2011.
391. Figueroa, D., and Robinson, M.J., The effects of sacrificial coatings on hydrogen embrittlement and re-embrittlement of ultra high strength steels, Corrosion Science, 50 (4), 1066–1079, 2008.
392. Michler, T., Yukhimchuk, A.A., and Naumann, J., Hydrogen environment embrittlement testing at low temperatures and high pressures, Corrosion Science, 50 (12), 3519–3526, 2008.
393. Kittel, J., Smanio, V., Fregonese, M., Garnier, L., and Lefebvre, X., Hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) testing of low alloy steel in sour environment: Impact of time of exposure on the extent of damage, Corrosion Science, 52 (4), 1386–1392, 2010.
394. Capelle, J., Dmytrakh, I., and Pluvinage, G., Comparative assessment of electrochemical hydrogen absorption by pipeline steels with different strength, Corrosion Science, 52 (5), 1554–1559, 2010.
395. Yao, Y., Qiao, L.J., and Volinsky, A.A., Hydrogen effects on stainless steel passive film fracture studied by nanoindentation, Corrosion Science, 53 (9), 2679–2683, 2011.
396. Venegas, V., Caleyo, F., Baudin, T., Espina-Hernandez, J.H., and Hallen, J.M., On the role of crystallographic texture in mitigating hydrogen-induced cracking in pipeline steels, Corrosion Science, In press, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2011.08.031.
397. Guy, K.W.A., The hydrogen economy, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78 (4), 324–327, 2000.
398. Dahoe, A.E., and Molkov, V.V., On the implementation of an international curriculum on hydrogen safety engineering into higher education, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21 (2), 222–224, 2008.
399. Salvi, O., Process Safety Research and its Impact on Sustainability and Resilience of the Society, Plenary Paper, A Frontiers of Research Workshop, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (October 21–22, 2011).
400. Pasman, H.J., and Rogers, W.J., Safety challenges in view of the upcoming hydrogen economy: An overview, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (6), 697–704, 2010.
401. Jordan, T., Adams, P., Azkarate, I., Baraldi, D., Barthelemy, H., Bauwens, L., Bengaouer, A., Brennan, S., Carcassi, M., Dahoe, A., Eisenrich, N., Engebo, A., Funnemark, E., Gallego, E., Gavrikov, A., Haland, E., Hansen, A.M., Haugom, G.P., Hawksworth, S., Jedicke, O., Kessler, A., Kotchourko, A., Kumar, S., Langer, G., Stefan, L., Lelyakin, A., Makarov, D., Marangon, A., Markert, F., Middha, P., Molkov, V., Nilsen, S., Papanikolaou, E., Perrette, L., Reinecke, E.-A., Schmidtchen, U., Serre-Combe, P., Stocklin, M., Sully, A., Teodorczyk, A., Tigreat, D., Venetsanos, A., Verfondern, K., Versloot, N., Vetere, A., Wilms, M., and Zaretskiy, N., Achievements of the EC Network of Excellence HySafe, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (3), 2656–2665, 2011.
402. Molkov, V., Hydrogen safety research: State-of-the-art, in Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards, Edinburgh, UK (April 23–27, 2007).
403. Molkov, V., Preface. Special Issue on Hydrogen Safety, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 21 (2), 129–130, 2008.
404. Amyotte, P.R., Process Safety Research Needs from the Industry Perspective, Plenary Paper, A Frontiers of Research Workshop, Mary Kay O’Connor Process Safety Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (October 21–22, 2011).
405. Amyotte, P.R., and Khan, F.I., An Inherently Safer Approach to Dust Explosion Risk Reduction, Strategic Project Grant (Safety and Security) No. 396398, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, 2010.
406. Amyotte, P.R., Are Classical Process Safety Concepts Relevant to Nanotechnology Applications? Journal of Physics: Conference Series 304 (Nanosafe2010: International Conference on Safe Production and Use of Nanomaterials), 012071, 2011.
407. Hendershot, D.C., Ventrone, T.A., Schwab, R.F., Ormsby, R.W., Davenport, J.A., and Bradford, W.J., History of Process Safety and Loss Prevention in the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Presented at the American Chemical Society, National Meeting, Washington, D.C. (August 28–September 1, 2005).
408. Kletz, T.A., The origin and history of loss prevention, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 77 (3), 109–116, 1999.
409. Knegtering, B., and Pasman, H.J., Safety of the process industries in the 21st century: A changing need of process safety management for a changing industry, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22 (2), 162–168, 2009.
410. Qi, R., Prem, K., Ng, D., Ranes, M., Yun, G., and Mannan, M.S., Challenges and needs for process safety in the new millenium, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 90(2), 91–100, March 2012.
411. Kirchsteiger, C., Impact of accident precursors on risk estimates from accident databases, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 10 (3), 159–167, 1997.
412. Amyotte, P.R., MacDonald, D.K., and Khan F.I., An analysis of CSB investigation reports concerning the hierarchy of controls, Process Safety Progress, 30 (3), 261–265, 2011.
413. Hopkins, A., Lessons from Longford. The Esso Gas Plant Explosion, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2000.
414. Hopkins, A., Safety, Culture and Risk. The Organisational Causes of Disasters, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
415. Hopkins, A., Failure to Learn. The BP Texas City Refinery Disaster, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2009.
416. Hopkins, A. (Editor), Learning from High Reliability Organisations, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia, 2009.
417. Biennial Report on Hydrogen Safety, HySafe (Safety of Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier), Chap. VI. http://www.hysafe.org.
418. American National Standard Institute (ANSI), Guide to Safety of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, ANSI/AIAA G-095-2004, Chap. 4. ANSI, Washington, D.C., 2004.
419. U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT), Guidelines for Use of Hydrogen Fuel in Commercial Vehicles, Final Report, US DOT, Washington, D.C., 2007.
420. Code of Practice on Safety in Storage, Handling and Distribution of Liquid Hydrogen, European Industrial Gases Association, 2002.
421. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Hydrogen safety, in Hydrogen Fuel: Production, Transport and Storage, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, 2008, 563–565.
422. Sklavounos, S., and Rigas, F., Computer simulation of shock waves transmission in obstructed terrains, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 17, 407, 2004.
423. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Explosion Hazard Assessment: A Study of the Feasibility and Benefits of Extending Current HSE Methodology to Take Account of Blast Sheltering, Teport HSL/2001/04, Sheffield, UK, 2001.
424. Rigas, F., and Sklavounos, S., Evaluation of hazards associated with hydrogen storage facilities, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30, 1501, 2005.
425. International Atomic Energy Agency, Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier and Its Production by Nuclear Power, IAEA-TECDOC-1085, 1999.
426. National Fire Protection Association, Vehicular Fuel Systems Code, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massachusetts, 2006.