The role of quantitative risk assessment in improving hazardous installations siting: A case study

Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 113-119

  Badri, Naser ^a   Nourai, Farshad ^a   Rashtchian, Davood ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Consequence analysis; Hazardous installations; Quantitative risk assessment; Siting

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861158706     PISSN: 10219986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS)., "Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout", American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York, pp. 1-50 (2003).
2. Cozzani V., Bandini R., Basta C., Christou D., Application of Land-Use Planning Criteria for the Control of Major Accident Hazards: A Case-Study, Journal of Hazardous Materials., 136, p. 170 (2006).
3. Bajpai S., Gupta J.P., Site Security for Chemical Process Industries, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries., 18, p. 301 (2005).
4. Abdolhamidzadeh B., Rashtchian D., Ashouri E., A New Methodology for Frequency Estimation of Second or Higher Level Domino Accidents In Process Plants Using Mote Carlo Simulation, Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering., 28, p. 21 (2008).
5. Havens J., Spicer T., United States Regulations for Siting LNG Terminals: Problems and Potential, Journal of Hazardous Materials., 140, p. 439 (2007).
6. Kaszniak M., Holmstrom D., Trailer Siting Issues: BP Texas City, Journal of Hazardous Materials., 159, p. 105 (2008).
7. Marangon A., Carcassi M., Engebo A., Nilsen S., Safety Distances: Definition and Values, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 32, p. 2192 (2007).
8. Taylor S.W., The Role of Consequence Modeling in LNG Facility Siting, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 142, p. 776 (2007).
9. nd ed., American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York, pp. 95-118 (2000).
10. Medina H., Arnolds J., Casal J., Process Design Optimization and Risk Analysis, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22, p. 566 (2009).
11. Rigas, F. and Sklavounos, S., Major Hazards Analysis for Populations Adjacent to Chemical Storage Facilities, Process Safety and Environmental Protection., 84, p. 1 (2004).
12. rd ed, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. pp. 853-952 (2005).
13. Cheremisinoff, N.P., "Handbook of Hazardous Chemical Properties", Butterworth-Heinemann, London, pp. 311-350 (2000).
14. [CNG Station in F-6 Afire After Gas Cylinder Explosion, Available from http://www.ParkTribune.com, Saturday, Nov. 04, (2006).
15. [Blueline Gutted at CNG pump", Chandigarh, India, Available from http://www.Tribuneindia.com, Thursday, Aug. 21, (2003).
16. Xieqin, "High-Pressure Gas Storage at the Filling Station of Vehicle Compressed Natural Gas", Tianranqi Gongye/Natural Gas Industry, 18, (1998).
17. Communication with HSE Department, Gaz Khodro Company, National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC), (2010).
18. Chung JB., Kim HK., Competition, Economic Benefits, Trust, And Risk Perception in Siting A Potentially Hazardous Facility, Landscape and Urban Planning., 91, p. 8 (2009).
19. Ward P., Susan B., Evaluation of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fueling System, California Energy Commission, (1999).
20. [Process Manual of Banihashem CNG Station", Greater Tehran Gas Company, Tehran, Iran, (2001).
21. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), "Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures", 3rd ed., American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York, pp. 425-568 (2007).
22. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), "Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases", American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York, pp. 108-215 (1999).
23. Casal, J, "Evaluation of the Effects and Consequences of Major Accidents in Industrial Plants", Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp.185-211 (2008).
24. Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Activity Responsible Function (ARF) Technical Library, Internal DNV Report, Norway, (1996).
25. System and Reliability Research, "Fault Tree Handbook", U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, (1981).
26. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), "Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria", American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), New York, pp. 298-305 (2009).
27. Badri N., Nourai F., Rashtchian D., Quantitative Risk Assessment to Site CNG Refueling Stations, Chemical Engineering Transactions., 19, p. 255 (2010).
28. Hirst I.L., Carter D.A., A Worst Case Methodology for Risk Assessment of Major Accident Installations, Process Safety Progress., 19, p. 2 (2000).
29. Ball DJ., Floyd PJ., "Societal Risks, Final Report", (1998).