The quantitative risk assessment of a hydrogen generation unit

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Volumn 37, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 19241-19249

  Jafari, Mohammad Javad ^a   Zarei, Esmaeil ^a   Badri, Naser ^b  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Assessment; Hydrogen; Quantitative; Risk; Safety

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; CONSEQUENCE MODELING; DESULPHURIZATION; GENERIC DATA; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; HYDROGEN GENERATIONS; HYDROGEN GENERATOR; HYDROGEN-GENERATION PROCESS; JET FIRE; NATURAL GAS REFORMING; QUANTITATIVE; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK ESTIMATION; SAFE DISTANCE;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DESULFURIZATION; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; RISK PERCEPTION; RISKS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84869796371     PISSN: 03603199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.082     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. R. Gerboni, and E. Salvador Hydrogen transportation systems: elements of risk analysis Energy 34 2009 2223 2229
2. U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen incident reporting and lessons learned Available online in: 2011 May 24 http://www.h2incidents.org
3. Rosyid O. System-analytic safety evaluation of the hydrogen cycle for energetic utilization [thesis]: Germany: University of Magdeburg; 2006.
4. Li ZhY, X.M. Pan, and J.X. Ma Quantitative risk assessment on a gaseous hydrogen refueling station in Shanghai International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35 2010 6822 6829
5. M. Moonis, A.J. Wilday, and M.J. Wardman Semi-quantitative risk assessment of commercial scale supply chain of hydrogen fuel and implications for industry and society Process Safety and Environmental Protection 88 2 2010 97 108
6. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis pp. 95-118 2nd ed. 2000 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) New York
7. Det Norske Veritas ARF-activity responsible function Norway DNV Proprietary Documentation 1998
8. EVT-MAHLER Process description of hydrogen plant, EVT-MAHLER GMBH (internal documents of studied plant) 2011
9. F.P. Lees Loss Prevention in the process industries pp. 853-952 3rd ed. 2005 Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford
10. 2 release and jet dispersion-validation of PHAST and KFX, Report for DNV research CT1910.DNV energy 2008
11. N.P. Cheremisinoff Handbook of hazardous chemical properties pp. 311-350 2000 Butterworth-Heinemann London
12. Det Norske Veritas Ref: T14-Rev Technical note process equipment failure frequency Vol. 3 2006
13. CPR 18E (Purple Book) Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment, committee for the prevention of disasters 1999
14. Norsk Hydro ASA and Det Norske Veritas Risk acceptance criteria for hydrogen refueling stations 2003 Norsk Hydro ASA and Det Norske Veritas AS for WP5.2 European Integrated Hydrogen Project 2
15. ACMH Advisory committee on major hazards, major hazard aspects of the transport of dangerous substances, health and safety executive, HMSO 1992 Institution of Chemical Engineers 0118856766
16. A. Marangon, M. Carcassi, A. Engebo, and S. Nilsen Safety distances: definition and values International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32 2007 2192 2197
17. National Aerodynamics and Space Administration Safety Standard for hydrogen and hydrogen systems Guidelines for hydrogen system design, material selection, operation, storage and transportation 1997 Report No: NSS 1740-16
18. P.X. Li Zhiyong, and M.A. Jianxin Quantitative risk assessment on 2010 Expo hydrogen station International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36 2011 4079 4086