Towards a common framework of grounded action cognition: Relating motor control, perception and cognition

Cognition

Volumn 146, Issue , 2016, Pages 81-89

  Gentsch, Antje ^a,b   Weber, Arne ^c   Synofzik, Matthis ^d,e   Vosgerau, Gottfried ^c   Schütz Bosbach, Simone ^b,f  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^e GERMAN CENTER FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES DZNE   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action cognition; Action perception; Common coding; Grounded cognition; Internal models; Motor control; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CODING AND CLASSIFICATION; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; GROUNDED ACTION COGNITION; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; NOTE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THEORY OF MIND; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84942280053     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.010     Document Type: Note

References (64)

1. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22(4):577-609. Discussion 610-560.
2. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:617-645.
3. Barsalou L.W., Kyle Simmons W., Barbey A.K., Wilson C.D. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(2):84-91.
4. Beer R.D. A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence 1995, 72(1-2):173-215.
5. Bell C.C., Grant K. Corollary discharge inhibition and preservation of temporal information in a sensory nucleus of mormyrid electric fish. Journal of Neuroscience 1989, 9(3):1029-1044.
6. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(5):551-559.
7. Chambon V., Haggard P. Premotor or ideomotor: How does the experience of action come about?. Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline 2013, 359-380. MIT Press. W. Prinz, M. Beisert, A. Herwig (Eds.).
8. de Vega M., Glenberg A.M., Graesser A.C. Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Decety J., Jeannerod M., Prablanc C. The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research 1989, 34(1-2):35-42.
10. Desmurget M., Reilly K.T., Richard N., Szathmari A., Mottolese C., Sirigu A. Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science 2009, 324(5928):811-813.
11. Ditchburn R.W., Ginsborg B.L. Vision with a stabilized retinal image. Nature 1952, 170(4314):36-37.
12. Elsner B., Hommel B. Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(1):229-240.
13. Engel A.K., Maye A., Kurthen M., König P. Where's the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17(5):202-209.
14. Fodor J.A. The language of thought 1975, Harvard University Press.
15. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological sciences 2005, 360(1456):815-836.
16. Friston K., Daunizeau J., Kilner J., Kiebel S.J. Action and behavior: A free-energy formulation. Biological Cybernetics 2010, 102(3):227-260.
17. Friston K., Mattout J., Kilner J. Action understanding and active inference. Biological Cybernetics 2011, 104(1-2):137-160.
18. Gallese V. The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological sciences 2003, 358(1431):517-528.
19. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996, 119(Pt 2):593-609.
20. Gallese V., Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2(12):493-501.
21. Gibson E.J. Principles of perceptual learning and development 1969, Appleton-Century Crofts, New York.
22. Glenberg A.M., Kaschak M.P. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9(3):558-565.
23. Goldman A.I. In defense of the simulation theory. Mind & Language 1992, 7:104-119.
24. Gordon R.M. Folk psychology as simulation. Mind & Language 1986, 1:158-171.
25. Greenwald A.G. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review 1970, 77(2):73-99.
26. Grossman M., Anderson C., Khan A., Avants B., Elman L., McCluskey L. Impaired action knowledge in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2008, 71(18):1396-1401.
27. Grush R. The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004, 27(3):377-396. Discussion 396-442.
28. Held R., Hein A. Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1963, 56:872-876.
29. Hommel B., Musseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24(5):849-878. Discussion 878-937.
30. Hurley S. Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese 2001, 129:3-40.
31. Hurley S. The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2008, 31(1):1-22. Discussion 22-58.
32. Hutto D.D., Myin E. Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content 2013, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
33. Iacoboni M. Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:653-670.
34. Iacoboni M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Gallese V., Buccino G., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology 2005, 3(3):e79.
35. James, W. (1890/1981). The principles of psychology. Harvard University Press (original work published 1890).
36. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 2001, 14(1 Pt 2):S103-S109.
37. Jeannerod M., Decety J. Mental motor imagery: A window into the representational stages of action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1995, 5(6):727-732.
38. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1999, 9(6):718-727.
39. Keijzer F. Representation in dynamical and embodied cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 2002, 2002(3):275-288.
40. Kilner J.M., Friston K.J., Frith C.D. Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing 2007, 8(3):159-166.
41. Kunde W. Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27(2):387-394.
42. Libon D.J., McMillan C., Avants B., Boller A., Morgan B., Burkholder L., et al. Deficits in concept formation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuropsychology 2012, 26(4):422-429.
43. Martinez-Conde S., Macknik S.L., Troncoso X.G., Dyar T.A. Microsaccades counteract visual fading during fixation. Neuron 2006, 49(2):297-305.
44. Martinez-Conde S., Otero-Millan J., Macknik S.L. The impact of microsaccades on vision: Towards a unified theory of saccadic function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2013, 14(2):83-96.
45. Moore J.W., Ruge D., Wenke D., Rothwell J., Haggard P. Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: Pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 2010, 277(1693):2503-2509.
46. Noë A. Action in perception 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. O'Regan J.K., Noë A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24(5):939-973. Discussion 973-1031.
48. Pecher D., Zwaan R.A. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language and thinking 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9(2):129-154.
50. Pylyshyn Z.W. Computation and cognition 1984, MIT Press.
51. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
52. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 3(2):131-141.
53. Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W. Prospective coding in event representation. Cognitive Processing 2007, 8(2):93-102.
54. Semin G.R., Smith E.R. Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York.
55. Shapiro L. Embodied cognition 2011, Routledge Press, New York.
56. Shin Y.K., Proctor R.W., Capaldi E.J. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136(6):943-974.
57. Smith E.E., Medin D.L. Categories and concepts 1981, Harvard University Press.
58. Sperry R.W. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1950, 43(6):482-489.
59. Tulving E. Episodic and semantic memory. Organization and memory 1972, 381-403. Academic Press. E. Tulving, W. Donaldson (Eds.).
60. Vogt S., Rienzo F.D., Collet C., Collins A., Guillot A. Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013, 7:807.
61. von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. Das Reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 1950, 37:464-476.
62. Weber A.M., Vosgerau G. Grounding action representations. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2012, 3(1):53-69.
63. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9(4):625-636.
64. Wolpert D.M., Miall R.C. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks 1996, 9(8):1265-1279.