Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 449-456

  Mallat, J ^a   Meddour, M ^a   Durville, E ^a   Lemyze, M ^a   Pepy, F ^a   Temime, J ^a   Vangrunderbeeck, N ^a   Tronchon, L ^a   Thevenin, D ^a   Tavernier, B ^b  

^a Centre Hospitalier du Dr Schaffner de Lens   (France)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

cardiac output; fluid therapy; goal directed therapy; haemodynamics; monitoring; pulse pressure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS CARDIAC INDEX; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DEEP SEDATION; FEMALE; FIBEROPTIC OXIMETER CATHETER; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; FLUID THERAPY; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HEART INDEX; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION; VENTILATED PATIENT; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; CRITICAL ILLNESS; HEART OUTPUT; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CRITICAL ILLNESS; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; STROKE VOLUME; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84942252428     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev222     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 259-65
2. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-8
3. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-21
4. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8
5. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL, et al. Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002; 283: H1729-33
6. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7
7. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1195-201
8. Guinot PG, de Broca B, Bernard E, Abou Arab O, Lorne E, Dupont H. Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 660-4
9. Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicenter point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112: 681-5
10. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23
11. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefevre D, et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15: R85
12. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: false-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2570-5
13. De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1092-7
14. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1333-7
15. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17: 290-5
16. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet P-J, et al. Increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml of colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 541-7
17. Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Lehot JJ, et al. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac output during volume expansion in the perioperative period? Anesthesiology 2012; 117: 1165-74
18. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 580-637
19. Mallat J, Pepy F, Lemyze M, et al. Extravascular lung water indexed or not to predicted body weight is a predictor of mortality in septic shock patients. J Crit Care 2012; 27: 376-83
20. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber QuantificationWriting Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440-63
21. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-45.
22. Ray P, Le Manach Y, Riou B, Houle TT. Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 1023-40
23. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. Better confidence intervals. In: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman& Hall/CRC, 1994; 178-201
24. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a 'gray zone' approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231-41
25. Wu Y, Zhou S, Zhou Z, Liu B. A 10-second fluid challenge guided by transthoracic echocardiography can predict fluid responsiveness. Crit Care 2014; 18: R108
26. Gödje O, Höke K, Goetz AE, et al. Reliability of a newalgorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 52-8
27. BuhreW,Weyland A, Kazmaier S, et al. Comparison of cardiac output assessed by pulse-contour analysis and thermodilution in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 13: 437-40
28. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-30
29. Muller L, Candela D, Nyonzyma L, et al. Disagreement between pulse contour analysis and transpulmonary thermodiluation for cardiac output monitoring after routine therapeutic interventions in ICU patients with acute circulatory failure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 664-9
30. Monnet X, Anguel N, Naudin B, Jabot J, Richard C, Teboul JL. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices. Crit Care 2010; 14: R109
31. Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, Osman D, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 434-40
32. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 1180-92
33. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL. Predicting volume responsiveness by using end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 951-6
34. Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, et al. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care 2014; 18: 587
35. Benes J, Zatloukal J, Kletecka J, Simanova A, Haidingerova L, Pradl R. Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates as predictors of fluid responsiveness: applicability in the early stages of specific critical states. J Clin Monit Comput 2014; 28: 225-31