Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 660-664

  Guinot, P G ^a   De Broca, B ^a   Bernard, E ^a   Arab, O Abou ^a   Lorne, E ^a,b   Dupont, H ^a,b  

^a AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

Author keywords

anaesthesia; Doppler intraoperative; laparoscopy; monitoring; stroke volume

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; ETOMIDATE; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; ROCURONIUM; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOPULMONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DOPPLER DEVICE; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETRY; RESPIRATORY AIRFLOW; RESPIRATORY STROKE VOLUME;

ANAESTHESIA; DOPPLER, INTRAOPERATIVE; LAPAROSCOPY; MONITORING; STROKE VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; STROKE VOLUME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896973378     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet430     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Mark JB, Steinbrook RA, Gugino LD, et al. Continuous noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output with esophageal Doppler ultrasound during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 1013-20
2. Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, et al. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: Evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 678-84
3. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4: 282-9
4. Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. J Anesth 2011; 25: 904-16
5. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, et al. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: A gray zone approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 231-41
6. Guinot PG, de Broca B, Abou Arab O, et al. Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 28-33
7. Hoiseth LO, Hoff IE, Myre K, Landsverk SA, Kirkebøen KA. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56: 777-86
8. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, et al. Influence of increased intra-Abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 650-8
9. Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-Abdominal pressure: An experimental study. Crit Care 2011; 15: R33
10. Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Matsura T, Mori T, NishikawaK. Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-Flotrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 170-7
11. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-45
12. Ray P, Le Manach Y, Riou B, Houle TT. Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 1023-40
13. Joris JL, NoirotDP, LegrandMJ, Jacquet NJ, Lamy ML.Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 1067-71
14. Harris SN, Ballantyne GH, Luther MA, Perrino AC Jr. Alterations of cardiovascular performance during laparoscopic colectomy: A combined hemodynamic and echocardiographic analysis. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 482-7
15. Vivier E, Metton O, Piriou V, et al. Effects of increased intraabdominal pressure on central circulation. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96: 701-7
16. Alfonsini P, Vieillard-Baron A, Coggia M, et al. Cardiac function during intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation for aortic surgery: A transesophageal echocardiographic study. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 1304-10
17. Bliacheriene F, Machado SB, Fonseca EB, Otsuke D, Auler JO Jr, Michard F. Pulse pressure variation as a tool to detect hypovolemia during pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 1268-72
18. Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, et al. Increased intra-Abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure innormovolemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 163-71
19. Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44: 834-41
20. Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S, et al. Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 591-7
21. SingerM, Allen MJ, WebbAR, Bennett ED. Effects of alterations in left ventricular filling, contractility, and systemic vascular resistance on the ascending aortic blood velocity waveform of normal subjects. Crit Care Med 1991; 19: 1138-45
22. Singer M, Bennett ED. Noninvasive optimization of left ventricularfilling using esophageal Doppler. Crit Care Med 1991; 19: 1132-7
23. Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: Randomized controlled trial. Br Med J 1997; 315: 909-12.