In vivo monitoring of transcriptional dynamics after lower-limb muscle injury enables quantitative classification of healing

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Aguilar, Carlos A ^a   Shcherbina, Anna ^a   Ricke, Darrell O ^a   Pop, Ramona ^b,c,d   Carrigan, Christopher T ^e   Gifford, Casey A ^b,c,d   Urso, Maria L ^e,f   Kottke, Melissa A ^e   Meissner, Alexander ^b,c,d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^c HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Harvard University   (United States)

^e United States Army Institute of Environmental Medicine Military Performance Division ^*  (United States)

^f Smith and Nephew Research Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENT; NOTCH RECEPTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME; WNT PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; INJURIES; LOWER LIMB; MALE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; PATHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; COMPLEMENT SYSTEM PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHENOTYPE; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TRANSCRIPTOME; WNT PROTEINS; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84941890888     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep13885     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Kirkendall, D. T. & Garrett, W. E. Clinical perspectives regarding eccentric muscle injury. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 403, S81-S89 (2002).
2. Hauret, K. G., Jones, B. H., Bullock, S. H., Camham-Chervak, M. & Canada, S. Muscoskeletal injuries-Description of an underrecognized injury problem among military personnel. Amer. J Prev. Med. 38, S61-S70 (2010).
3. Carlson, B. M. & Faulkner, J. A. The regeneration of skeletal muscle fibers following injury: a review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 15, 187-198 (1983).
4. Jarvinen, T. A., Jarvinen, T. L., Kaariainen, M., Kalimo, H. & Jarvinen, M. Muscle Injuries: Biology and Treatment. Amer. J. Sports Med. 33, 745-764 (2005).
5. Tidball, J. G. & Villalta, S. A. Regulatory interactions between muscle and the immune system during muscle regeneration. Amer. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 298, R1173-R1187 (2010).
6. Yan, Z. et al. Highly coordinated gene regulation in mouse skeletal muscle regeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 2787, 8826-8836 (2003).
7. Warren, G. L. et al. Mechanisms of skeletal muscle injury and repair revealed by gene expression studies in mouse models. J. Physiol. 582, 825-841 (2007).
8. Burzyn, D. et al. A special population of regulatory T cells potentiates muscle repair. Cell 155, 1282-1295 (2013).
9. Heredia, J. E. et al. Type 2 innate signals stiumulate fibro/adipogenic progenitors to facilitate muscle regeneration. Cell 153, 376-388 (2013).
10. Urso, M. Anti-Inflammatory interventions and sekeletal muscle injury: benefit or detriment? Journal of Applied Physiology 115, 920-208 (2013).
11. El-Khoury, G. Y., Brandser, E. A., Kathol, M. H., Tearse, D. S. & Callaghan, J. J. Imaging of muscle injuries. Skeletal Radiol. 25, 3-11 (1996).
12. Lee, J. C., Mitchell, A. W. M. & Healy, J. C. Imaging of muscle injury in the elite athlete. Br. J. Radiol. 85, 1173-1185 (2012).
13. Kowal, D. M. Nature and causes of injuries in women resulting from an endurance training program. Am. J. Sports Med. 8, 265-269 (1980).
14. Davis, W. T., Fletcher, S. A. & Guillamondegui, O. D. Muscoskeletal occupational injury among surgeons: effects for patients, providers, and institutions. J Surg Res 189, 207-212 (2014).
15. Fulton, J. et al. Injury risk is altered by previous injury: a systematic review of the literature and presentation of causative neuromuscular factors. Int J Sports Phys Ther 9, 583-595 (2014).
16. Bock, C. et al. Reference maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable high-throughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines. Cell 144, 439-452 (2011).
17. Koh, W. et al. Noninvasive in vivo monitorin of tissue-specific global gene expression in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7361-7366 (2014).
18. Szelenyi, E. R. & Urso, M. L. Time-course analysis of injured skeletal muscle suggests a critical involvement of ERK1/2 signaling in the acute inflammatory response. Muscle & Nerve 45, 552-561 (2012).
19. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-Seq. Nature Biotech. 31, 46-53 (2013).
20. Tidball, J. G. Inflammatory cell response to acute muscle injury. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 27, 1022-1032 (1995).
21. Tidball, J. G. Inflammatory processes in muscle injury and repair. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 288, R345-R353 (2005).
22. Warren, G. L. et al. Role of CC chemokines in skeletal muscle functional restoration after injury. Amer. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 286, C1031-C1036 (2004).
23. Lu, H., Huang, D., Ransohoff, R. M. & Zhou, L. Acute skeletal muscle injury: CCL2 expression by both monocytes and injured muscle is required for repair. FASEB 25, 3344-3355 (2011).
24. Chen, G. Y., Tang, J., Zheng, P. & Liu, Y. CD24 and Siglec-10 selectively repress tissue damage-induced immune responses. Science 323, 1722-1725 (2009).
25. Masuda, K. et al. Arid5a controls IL-6 mRNA stability, which contributes to elevation of IL-6 level in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9409-9414 (2013).
26. Matsushita, K. et al. Zc3h12a is an RNase essential for controlling immune responses by regulating mRNA decay. Nature 458, 1158-1190 (2009).
27. Schmitz, J. et al. IL-33, an Interleukin-1-like Cytokine that Signals via the IL-1 Receptor-Related Protein ST2 and Induces T Helper Type 2-Associated Cytokines. Immunity 23, 4779-4490 (2009).
28. Schiering, C. et al. The alarmin IL-33 promotes regulatory T-cell function in the intestine. Nature 513, 564-568 (2014).
29. Kurowska-Stolarska, M. et al. IL-33 amplifies the polarization of alternatively activated macrophages that contribute to airway inflammation. J. Immunol 183, 6469-6477 (2009).
30. Naito, A. T. et al. Complement C1q activates canonical Wnt signaling and promotes aging-related phenotypes. Cell 149, 1298-1313 (2012).
31. Mann, C. J. et al. Aberrant repair and fibrosis development in skeletal muscle. Skelet. Muscle 1, 21 (2011).
32. Conboy, I. M. & Rando, T. A. The regulation of Notch signaling controls satellite cell activation and cell fate determination in postnatal myogenesis. Dev. Cell 3, 397-409 (2002).
33. Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Smythe, G. M. & Rando, T. A. Notch-mediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle. Science 302, 1575-1577 (2003).
34. Pourquie, O., Coltey, M., Breant, C. & Le Douarin, N. M. Control of somite patterning by signals from the lateral plate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92, 3219-3223 (1995).
35. Alfaro, M. P. et al. SFRP2 suppression of bone morphogenic protein (BMP) and Wnt signaling mediates mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) self-renewal promoting engraftment and myocardial repair. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 35645-35653 (2010).
36. Brack, A. S., Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Shen, J. & Rando, T. A. A temporal switch from Notch to Wnt signaling in muscle stem cells is necessary for normal adult myogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 2, 50-59 (2009).
37. Vasyutina, E. et al. RBP-J (Rbpsuh) is essential to main muscle progenitor cells and to generate satellite cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4443-4448 (2007).
38. Gao, X. et al. Hes6 acts as a transcriptional repressor in myoblasts and can induce the myogenic differentiation program. J. Cell. Biol. 154, (2001).
39. Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C. & Brown, R. A. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nature Molec. Cell Biol. 3, 349-363 (2002).
40. Muro, A. F. et al. Regulated splicing of the fibronectin EDA exon is essential for proper skin wound healing and normal lifespan. J. Cell Biol. 162, 149-160 (2003).
41. Serini, G. et al. The fibronectin domain ED-A is crucial for myofibroblastic phenotype induction by transforming growth factor-β 1. J. Cell. Biol. 142, 873-881 (1998).
42. Murphy, M. M., Lawson, J. A., Mathew, S. J., Hutcheson, D. A. & Kardon, G. Satellite cells, connective tissue fibroblasts and their interactions are crucial for muscle regeneration. Development 138, 3625-3637 (2011).
43. Wang, Y. X. & Rudnicki, M. A. Satellite cells, the engines of muscle repair. Nature Molec. Cell Biol. 13, 127-133 (2011).
44. Braun, T. & Gautel, M. Transcriptional mechanisms regulating skeletal muscle differentiation, growth and homeostasis. Nature Rev. Molec. Cell. Biol. 12, 349-361 (2011).
45. Hawke, T. J., Kanatous, S. B., Martin, C. M., Goetsch, S. C. & Garry, D. J. Rad is temporally regulated within myogenic progenitor cells during skeletal muscle regeneration. Amer. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 290, C379-387 (2006).
46. Pelosi, L. et al. Local expression of IGF-1 accelerates muscle regeneration by rapidly modulating inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. FASEB 21, 1393-1402 (2007).
47. Rochlin, K., Yu, S., Roy, S. & Baylies, M. K. Myoblast fusion: When it takes more to make one. Develop. Biol. 341, 66-83 (2010).
48. Millay, D. P. et al. Myomaker is a membrane activator of myoblast fusion and muscle formation. Nature 499, 301-305 (2013).
49. Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., Louradour, J. & Lamblin, P. Exploring strategies for training deep neural networks. J. Mach. Lear. Res. 1, 1-40 (2009).
50. Christov, C. et al. Muscle satellite cells and endothelial cells: close neighbors and privileged partners. Mol. Biol. Cel 18, 1397-1409 (2007).
51. Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nature Biotech 32, 381-386 (2014).
52. Bergstra, J. & Bengio, Y. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J. Mach. Lear. Res. 13, 281-305 (2012).
53. Levin, J. Z. et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods. Nature Meth. 7, 709-715 (2010).
54. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545-15550 (2005).
55. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37, 1-13 (2009).
56. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nature Protoc. 4, 44-57 (2009).
57. Katz, Y., Wang, E. T., Airoldi, E. & Burge, C. Analysis and design of RNA sequencing experiments for identifying isoform regulation. Nature Meth. 7, 1009-1015 (2010).
58. Patterson, D. W., Chan, K. H. & Tan, C. M. Time Series Forecasting with Neural Nets: A Comparative Study. Paper presented at Internat. Conf. Neur. Net. Applic. to Sig. Proc., Singapore. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers (1993).
59. Winters-Hilt S., Yelundur, A., McChesney, C. & Landry, M. Support vector machine implementations for classification and clustering. BMC Bioinform. 7, S4 (2006).
60. Manning, C., Raghavan, P. & Schutze, H. in Introduction to Information Retrieval 1st edn. Ch. 2, 101-123 (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
61. Hsu, C. W. & Lin, C. J. A. comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines IEEE Trans. Neur. Net. 13, 415-425 (2012).
62. Mayoraz, E. & Alpaydin, E. Support vector machines for multi-class classification. Paper presented at Proc. Inter. Wor. Artific. Neur. Net. 2, 833-842, Alicante, Spain., New York: Springer (1999).
63. Duan, K. R. C. & Nguyen, M. One-versus-one and one-versus-all multiclass SVM-RFE for gene seelction in cancer classification. Paper presented at Evol. Comp., Mach. Lear., Data Mining in Bioinform. 4447, 47-56, Valencia, Spain., New York: Springer Berlin, Heidelberg (2007).
64. Yao, F., Coquery, J. & Le Cao, K. Independent principal component analysis for biologically meaningful dimension reduction of large biological datasets. BMC Bioinform. 13:24 (2012).
65. Ma, S. & Dai, Y. Principal component analysis based methods in bioinformatics studies. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 714-722 (2011).
66. Vafaie, H. & Imam, I. Feature selection methods: genetic algorithms vs. greedy-like search. Paper presented at IEEE World Cong. on Comp. Intellig. Proc. Intern. Conf. Fuzzy Intel. Cont. Sys., Louisville, KY. IEEE (1994).
67. Jonnalagadda, S. & Srinivasan, R. Principal components analysis based methodology to identify differentially expressed genes in time-course microarray data. BMC Bioinform. 9, 267 (2008).