The persuasion context and results in online opinion seeking: Effects of message and source-the moderating role of network managers

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 828-835

  Cabezudo, Rebeca San José ^a   Izquierdo, Carmen Camarero ^a   Pinto, Javier Rodríguez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; TRUST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; TRUST;

EID: 84887940642     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0647     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Goldsmith RE, Horowitz D. Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising 2006; 6:1-16.
2. Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 2004; 18:38-52.
3. Chiang IP, Huang CY, Huang CW. Traffics metrics and Web 2.0-ness. Online Information Review 2010; 34:115-126.
4. Lee FSL, Vogel D, Limayem, M. Virtual community informatics: a review and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 2003; 5:47-61.
5. Wiertz C, Ruyter K. Beyond the call of duty: why customers participate in firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies 2007; 28:347-376.
6. Lu Y, Zhao L, Wang B. From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers' purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2010; 9:346-360.
7. East R. The impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand choice. ANZMAC 2005 Conference: Advertising/Marketing Communication Issues. http://anzmac.info/conference/2005/cd-site/pdfs/1-Advertising/1-East.pdf (accessed May 8, 2013).
8. Negroponte N, Maes P. Electronic word of mouth. Wired 1996, 4.10 (October).
9. Goldsmith RE. (2006) Electronic word-of-mouth. In Khosrow-Pour M, ed. Encyclopedia of E-Commerce, E-Government and Mobile Commerce. Chapter 67, pp. 408-412. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
10. Hsu MH, Ju TL, Yen CH, Chang CM. Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2007; 65:153-169.
11. Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K. Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing 2009; 73:90-102.
12. Wodzicki K, Schwämmlein E, Cress U, Kimmerle J. Does the type of anonymity matter? The impact of visualization on information sharing in online groups. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:157-160.
13. Smith T, Coyle JR, Lightfoot E, Scott A. Reconsidering models of influence: the relationship between consumer social networks and word-of-mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research 2007; 47:387-397.
14. Huang CC, Lin TC, Lin KJ. Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): integrating the social capital and social cognition theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2009; 8:160-169.
15. Gupta P, Harris J. How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: a motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research 2009; 63:1041-1049.
16. Twedt DW. A multiple factor analysis of advertising readership. Journal of Applied Psychology 1952; 36:207-215.
17. Diamond DS. A quantitative approach to magazine advertisement format selection. Journal of Advertising Research 1968; 5:376-386.
18. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Schumann D. Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research 1983; 10:135-146.
19. MacKenzie SB, Lutz RJ, Belch GE. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research 1986; 23:130-143.
20. MacInnis DJ, Jaworski BJ. Information processing from advertisements: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Marketing 1989; 53:1-23.
21. Cho CH. How advertising works on the WWW: modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 1999; 21:33-50.
22. Bellman S, Rossiter JR. The website schema. Journal of Interactive Advertising 2004; 4: 2.
23. Karson EJ, Fisher RJ. Reexaminating and extending the dual mediation hypothesis in an on-line advertising context. Psychology & Marketing 2005; 22:333-351.
24. SanJosé-Cabezudo R, Gutiérrez-Arranz AM, Gutiérrez-Cilla ́n J. The combined influence of central and peripheral routes in the online persuasion process. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2009; 12:299-308.
25. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. (1986) Communication and persuasion. Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Advances in Consumer Research 1981; 8:20-24.
27. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Goldman R. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981; 41:847-855.
28. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Heesacker M. Effects of rhetorical questions in persuasion: a cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981; 40:432-440.
29. Brown J, Broderick AJ, Lee N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing 2007; 21:2-20.
30. Chiu CM, Hsu MH, Wang ETG. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 2006; 42:1872-1888.
31. Wu JJ, Chen YH, Chung HS. Trust factors influencing virtual community members: a study of transaction communities. Journal of Business Research 2010; 63:1025-1032.
32. Johnson TJ, Kaye BK. In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of internet among politically interested internet users. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25: 175-182.
33. Chan KW, Li SY. Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: the salience of reciprocity. Journal of Business Research 2010; 63:1033-1040.
34. Huang CY, Chouy CJ, Lin PC. Involvement theory in constructing bloggers' intention to purchase travel products. Tourism Management 2010; 31:513-526.
35. Guadagno R, Cialdini R. (2005) Online persuasion and compliance: social influence on the Internet and beyond. In Amichai-Hambuerger Y, ed. The Social Net: understanding human behavior in cyberspace. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 91-114.
36. Gershoff AD, Broniarkrczyk SM, West PM. Recommendation or evaluation? Task sensitivity in information source selection. Journal of Consumer Research 2011; 28:418-438.
37. Haythornthwaite C. (1999) A social network theory of tie strength and media use: a framework for evaluatingmultilevel impacts of new media. Technical Report UIUCLIS-2002/1+DKRC, Graduate School of Library and Information Science. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
38. Krugman HE. The impact of television advertising: learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly 1965; 29: 349-356.
39. Lin HF. The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities: an empirical study. Internet Research 2007; 17:119-138.
40. Kuo RZ, Lee GG. KMS adoption: the effects of information quality. Management Decision 2009; 47:1633-1651.
41. Wang SC, Sy E, Fang K. The post-adoption behavior of online knowledge community: decomposing customer value. The Journal of Computer Information Systems 2010; 51:60-70.
42. Doney PM, Cannon JP. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 1997; 61:35-51.
43. Chin WW, Newsted PR. (1999) Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In Hoyle R, ed. Statistical strategies for small samples research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 307-341.
44. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 2009; 20:277-319.
45. MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff CB. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005; 90:710-730.
46. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will S. (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (beta), computer software. University of Hamburg. www.smartpls.de (accessed May 8, 2013).
47. Keil M, Tan BC, Wei KK, et al. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. Management Information Systems Quarterly 2000; 24:299-325.