Achieving Social Change: A Matter of All for One?

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 441-452

  de Lemus, Soledad ^a   Stroebe, Katherine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPING STRATEGY; RESEARCH; SOCIAL CHANGE;

EID: 84941073944     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/josi.12122     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2010). Current issues in the study of social stigma: Some controversies and unresolved issues. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 431-445. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01654.x.
2. Barreto, M., Ryan, M., & Schmitt, M. (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/11863-000.
3. Becker, J. C., Glick, P., Ilic, M., & Bohner, G. (2011). Damned if she does, damned if she doesn't? Social consequences of accepting versus rejecting benevolent sexist offers for the target and perpetrator. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 761-773. doi:10.1002/ejsp.823.
4. Becker, J. C., Barreto, M., Kahn, K. B., & de Oliveira Laux, S. H. (2015). The collective value of 'me' (and its limitations): Towards a more nuanced understanding of individual and collective coping with prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 497-516.
5. de Lemus, S., Spears, R., & Moya, M. (2012). The power of a smile to move you: Complementary submissiveness in women's posture as a function of gender salience and facial expression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1480-1494. doi: 10.1177/0146167212454178.
6. de Lemus, S., Spears, R., Bukowski, M., Moya, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Reversing implicit gender stereotypes as a function of exposure to traditional role relations. Social Psychology, 44, 109-117. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000140.
7. Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & De Groot, K. (2011). Gender bias primes elicit queen bee responses among senior police women. Psychological Science, 22, 1243-1249. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417258.
8. Derks, B., van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & Raghoe, G. (2015). Extending the queen bee effect: How Hindustani workers cope with disadvantage by distancing the self from the group. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 476-496.
9. Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867-872. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x.
10. Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., Thomae M., Tredoux, C., Kerr, P., & Quayle, M. (2015). Divide and rule, unite and resist: Contact, collective action and policy attitudes amongst historically disadvantaged groups. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 576-596.
11. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617.
12. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & VanKnippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.766.
13. Ellemers, N., Van Den Heuvel, H., DeGilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315-338. doi: 10.1348/0144666042037999.
14. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. New York: Psychology Press.
15. Górska, P., & Bilewicz, M. (2015). When "a group in itself" becomes "a group for itself": Overcoming inhibitory effects of superordinate categorization on LGBTQ individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 554-575.
16. Hansen, N. (2015): The development of psychological capacity for action: The empowering effect of a microfinance programme on women in Sri Lanka. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 597-613.
17. Iyer, A., & Ryan, M. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and ingroup identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 791-814. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.x.
18. Jaśko, K., & Kossowska, M. (2013). The impact of superordinate identification on the justification of intergroup inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 255-262. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1946.
19. Jiménez-Moya, G., Spears, R., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & de Lemus, S. (2015). By any means necessary? When and why low group identification paradoxically predicts radical collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 517-535.
20. Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (2009). Social and psychological basis of ideology and system justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2006). A social psychological perspective on perceiving and reporting discrimination. Law and Social Inquiry, 36, 801-830.
22. Klandermans, B. (2004). The demand and supply of participation: Social psychological correlates of participation in a social movement. In D. A. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 360-379). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470999103.ch16.
23. Kulich, K., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., & Iacoviello, V. (2015). Moving across status lines: Low concern for the ingroup and group identification. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 453-475.
24. Leach, C. W., & Livingstone, A. G. (2015). Contesting the meaning of intergroup disadvantage: Towards a psychology of resistance. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 614-632.
25. Louis, W. R. (2009). Collective Action-and Then What? Journal of Social Issues, 65, 727-748. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01623.x.
26. Nagda, B. A., Tropp, L. R., & Paluck, E. L. (2006). Looking back as we look ahead: Integrating research, theory, and practice on intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 439-451. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00467.x.
27. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
28. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F, & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Positive intergroup contact produces false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114-121. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x.
29. Smith, H. J., & Ortiz, D. J. (2002). Is it just me? The different consequences of personal and group relative deprivation. In I. Walker and H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation. Specification, development, and integration (pp. 91-115). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511527753.005.
30. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553. doi: 10.1177/0146167297235009.
31. Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2013). Mastering one's destiny: Mastery goals promote challenge and success despite social identity threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 748-762. doi: 10.1177/0146167213481067.
32. Stroebe, K., Wang, K., & Wright, S. C. (2015). Broadening perspectives on achieving social change. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 633-645.
33. Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 59-99. doi:10.1080/10463280340000117.
34. Sweetman, J., Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Pratto, F., & Saab, R. (2014). "I have a dream": A typology of social change goals. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 293-320. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v1i1.85.
35. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp.33-47). Monterey, CA: Brools/Cole.
36. Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behaviour: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129-148. doi: 10.1037/a0022728.
37. Tausch, N., Saguy, T., & Bryson, J. (2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change? It's impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 536-553.
38. van Zomeren, M., & Iyer, A. (2009). Introduction to the social and psychological dynamics of collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 645-660. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01618.x.
39. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008).Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.
40. Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (2002). Relative deprivation. Specification, development, and integration. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511527753.
41. Wright, S. C., & Baray, G. (2012). Models of social change in social psychology: Collective action or prejudice reduction? Conflict or harmony? In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.) Beyond prejudice: Extending the social psychology of conflict, inequality and social change (pp. 225-247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139022736.014.
42. Wright, S. C., & Lubensky, M. (2009). The struggle for social equality. Collective action vs. prejudice reduction. In S. Demoulin, J. P. Leyens & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291-310). New York: Psychology Press.
43. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.6.994.