The impact of superordinate identification on the justification of intergroup inequalities

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 255-262

  Jaśko, Katarzyna ^a   Kossowska, Malgorzata ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879601967     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1946     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Blair, I. V., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Exit, loyalty, and collective action among workers in a simulated business environment: Interactive effects of group identification and boundary permeability. Social Justice Research, 16, 95-108. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024271019738
2. Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). American = White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447-466. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447
3. Dixon, J. A., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867-872. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x
4. Dixon, J. A., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. G. (2010). 'Let them eat harmony': Prejudice reduction and the political attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 76-80. DOI: 10.1177/0963721410363366
5. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of "we": Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3-20. DOI: 10.1177/1088868308326751
6. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
7. Glasford, D. E., & Calcagno, J. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 323-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
8. Hamer, K. (2009). Polacy w cia{ogonek}gu dekady zmiany systemowej [Poles during the decade of political system change]. In P. Radkiewicz, & K. Siemieńska (Eds.), Spoleczeństwo w czasach zmiany: Badania Polskiego Generalnego Sondażu Spolecznego 1992-2009 [Society in times of change: Polish General Social Survey 1992-2009] (pp. 86-105). Warszawa: ISS.
9. Harth, N. S., Kessler, T., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Advantaged group's emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: The dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 115-129. DOI: 10.1177/0146167207309193
10. Hehman, E., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Mania, E. W., Guerra, R., Wilson, D. C., & Friel, B. M. (2012). Group status drives majority and minority integration preferences. Psychological Science, 23, 46-52. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611423547
11. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x
12. Jaśko, K. (2011). Psychological underpinnings of democratic system justification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Jagiellonian University.
13. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edn, Vol. 2, pp. 1122-1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
14. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
15. Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., ..., Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of ingroup identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
16. Lowery, B. S., Unzueta, M. M., Knowles, E. D., & Goff, P. A. (2006). Concern for the ingroup and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 961-974. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961
17. Saguy, T., & Chernyak-Hai, L. (2012). Intergroup contact can undermine disadvantaged group members' attributions to discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 714-720. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.003
18. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114-121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
19. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 409-426. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00026-0
20. Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263-277. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203256690
21. Subasic, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 330-352. DOI: 10.1177/1088868308323223
22. Sweeney, P. D. (1990). Distributive justice and pay satisfaction: A field test of an equity theory prediction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 329-341.
23. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Montery, CA: Brooks-Cole.
24. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
25. Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Boettcher, F. (2004). Of bikers, teachers, and Germans: Groups' diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 385-400. DOI: 10.1348/0144666042037944
26. Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288-303. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288