Moving across Status Lines: Low Concern for the Ingroup and Group Identification

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 453-475

  Kulich, Clara ^a   Lorenzi Cioldi, Fabio ^a   Iacoviello, Vincenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHNIC CONFLICT; ETHNIC GROUP; IDENTITY CONSTRUCTION; SOCIAL INCLUSION;

EID: 84941098905     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/josi.12123     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ABC News. (September 18, 2013). Bronwyn Bishop defends male-dominated Cabinet amid Ita Buttrose's 'glass ceiling' criticism. Retrieved August 6, 2014 from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-17/ita-buttrose-criticises-lack-of-women-in-cabinet/4961704.
2. Arai, M., & Thoursie, P. S. (2009). Renouncing personal names: An empirical examination of surname change and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 127-147. doi:10.1086/593964. Accessed at August 6, 2014.
3. Baray, G., Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2009). When I equals we: Exploring the relation between social and personal identity of extreme right-wing political party members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 625-647. doi:10.1348/014466608x389582.
4. Becker, J. C., Barreto, M., Kahn, K. B., & de Oliveira Laux, S. H. (2015). The collective value of 'me' (and it's limitations): Towards a more nuanced understanding of individual versus collective coping with prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 497-516.
5. Becker, J. C., & Wagner, U. (2009). Doing gender differently - The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women's endorsement of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 487-508. doi:10.1002/ejsp.551.
6. Bettencourt, B. A., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520-542. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.520.
7. Blair, I. V., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Exit, loyalty, and collective action among workers in a simulated business environment: Interactive effects of group identification and boundary permeability. Social Justice Research, 16, 95-108. doi:10.1023/A:1024271019738.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.
10. Capozza, D., & Volpato, C. (1999). Relations intergroupes: Approches classiques et contemporaines [Intergroup relations: Classical and contemporary approaches]. In R. Y. Bourhis & J.-P. Leyens (Eds.), Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes [Stereotypes, discrimination, and intergroup relations] (pp. 13-40). Bruxelles: Mardaga.
11. Crisp, R. J., Stathi, S., Turner, R. N., & Husnu, S. (2008). Imagined intergroup contact: Theory, paradigm and practice. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1-18. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00155.x.
12. Deaux, K. (2008). To be an American: Immigration, hyphenation, and incorporation. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 925-943. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00596.x.
13. Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & de Groot, K. (2011). Gender-bias primes elicit queen-bee responses among senior policewomen. Psychological Science, 22, 1243-1249. doi:10.1177/0956797611417258.
14. Derks, B., van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & Raghoe, G. (2015). Extending the queen bee effect: How Hindustani workers cope with disadvantage by distancing the self from the group. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 476-496.
15. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2007). Another view of 'we': Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 296-330. doi:10.1080/10463280701726132.
16. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004.
17. Ellemers, N. (2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy - Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 205-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315-338. doi:10.1348/0144666042037999.
19. Geschwender, J. A. (1967). Continuities in theories of status consistency and cognitive dissonance. Social Forces, 46, 160-171. doi:10.2307/2574596.
20. Goffman, E. W. (1957). Status consistency and preference for change in power distribution. American Sociological Review, 22, 275-281. Retrieved October 2, 2014 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2088466.
21. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416-427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416.
22. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove. Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N., Schmitt, M. T., & Spears, R. (2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceive discrimination form the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204-1213. doi:10.1177/0146167201279012.
24. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B. M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 130-140. doi:10.1177/0146167202238378.
25. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263. doi:10.1177/0146167201272010.
26. Kang, S. K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547-574. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015025.
27. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
28. Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class as culture: The convergence of resources and rank in the social realm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 246-250. doi:10.1177/0963721411414654.
29. Leach, C. W., & Livingstone, A. G. (2015). Contesting the meaning of intergroup disadvantage: Towards a psychology of resistance. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 614-632.
30. Lenski, G. E. (1956). Social participation and status crystallization. American Sociological Review, 21, 458-464. doi:10.2307/2088714.
31. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Buschini, F., & Alliot, L. (2010). Dual identities in a hospital. Unpublished Data. University of Geneva and University of Bordeaux.
32. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Buschini, F., Menin, M. S., & Shimizu, A. (2011). Análise psicosocial das ações afirmativas na universidade pública brasileira: contribuições das representações sociais [Affirmative action policies in a Brazilian public university: A social representations perspective]. In: P. Unger, R. Bataglia & S. Marcos Ribeiro de Carvalho (Eds.), Psicologia da Educação: temas e pesquisas. Marília: Oficina Universitária; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica.
33. Olsen, M. E., & Tully, J. C. (1972). Socioeconomic-ethnic status inconsistency and preference for political change. American Sociological Review, 37, 560-574. Retrieved October 2, 2014 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2093451.
34. Penner, A. M., & Saperstein, A. (2008). How social status shapes race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 19628-19630.
35. Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). Reactions to ethnic deviance: The role of backlash in racial stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 265-281. doi:10.1037/a0018304.
36. Pinto I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107-119. doi:10.1037/a0018187.
37. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
38. Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269-281. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.
39. Ridgeway, C. L., & Erickson, K. G. (2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 579-615. doi:10.1086/318966.
40. Roccas, S. (2003). The effects of status on identification with multiple groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 351-366. doi:10.1002/ejsp.151.
41. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88-106. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01.
42. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157.
43. Saguy, T., & Chernyak-Hai, L. (2012). Intergroup contact can undermine disadvantaged group members' attributions to discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 714-720. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.003.
44. Sampson, E. E. (1969). Studies of status incongruence. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 4, pp. 225-270). New York: Academic Press.
45. Shields, S. A. (Ed.). (2008). Intersectionality of social identities: A gender perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301-311. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.
46. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Staines, G., Tavris, C., & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The Queen Bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7, 55-59.
48. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
49. Tausch, N., Saguy, T., & Bryson, J. (2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change? It's impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 536-553.
50. Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007.
51. Vanbeselaere, N., Boen, F., & Smeesters, D. (2003). Tokenism also works at the group level: The impact of boundary permeability upon reactions by members in a disadvantaged group. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 104-121. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.2.104.
52. Warner, R., Hornsey, M. J., & Jetten, J. (2007). Why minority group members resent impostors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1-17. doi:10.1002/ejsp.332.
53. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274. doi: 0022-3514/97.
54. Wright, S. C. (2001). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes (pp. 409-430). Oxford: Blackwell.
55. Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1999). Success under tokenism: Co-option of the newcomer and the prevention of collective protest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 369-396. doi:10.1348/014466699164220.
56. Youtube. (October 9, 2012). Gillard grills Abbott on his misogyny. Retrieved August 6, 2014 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0LFKwfvvNY.