Testing the impact of an information literacy course: Undergraduates' perceptions and use of the university libraries' web portal

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 263-274

  Chen, Yu Hui ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941034219     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2015.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adam D.A., Nelson R.R., Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: replication. MIS Quarterly 1992, 16:227-247.
2. Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision Sciences 1999, 30:361-391.
3. Al-Gahtani S.S. Computer technology acceptance success factors in Saudi Arabia: An exploratory study. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 2004, 7:5-29.
4. Al-Gahtani S.S., King M. Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour & Information Technology 1999, 18:277-297.
5. Amoako-Gyampah K., Salam A.F. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information and Management 2004, 41:731-745.
6. Amoroso D.L., Cheney P.H. Testing a causal model of end-user application effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems 1991, 8(1):63-89.
7. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 1982, 37:122-147.
8. Bradley J., Lee C.C. ERP training and user satisfaction: A case study. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems 2007, 3(4):33-50.
9. Chandio F.H., Abbasi M.S., Nizamani H.A., Nizamani Q.U.A. Online banking information systems acceptance: A structural equation modelling analysis. International Journal of Business Information Systems 2013, 12:177-193.
10. Churchill G.A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 1979, 16:64-73.
11. Compeau D.R., Higgins C.A., Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly 1999, 23:145-158.
12. D'Ambra J., Rice R.E. Emerging factors in user evaluation of the world wide web. Information Management 2001, 38:373-384.
13. D'Ambra J., Wilson C.S. Explaining perceived performance of the world wide web: uncertainty and the task-technology fit model. Internet Research 2004, 14:294-310.
14. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989, 13:319-339.
15. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989, 35:982-1003.
16. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 1992, 3:60-95.
17. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 2003, 19(4):9-30.
18. Doll W.J., Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly 1988, 12:259-274.
19. Gallivan M.J., Spitler V.K., Koufaris M. Does technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of co-workers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. Journal of Management Information System 2005, 22(1):153-192.
20. Gefen D., Straub D.W. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2000, 1(8):1-28.
21. Häkkinen L., Hilmola O.-P. Life after ERP implementation: Long-term development of user perceptions of system success in an after-sales environment. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 2008, 21:285-310.
22. Hartono E., Santhanam R., Holsapple C.W. Factors that contribute to management support system success: An analysis of field studies. Decision Support Systems 2007, 43:256-268.
23. Heany D.E. Education: The critical link in getting managers to use management systems. Interfaces 1972, 2(3):1-7.
24. Heinrichs J.H., Lim K.-S., Lim J.-S., Spangenberg M.A. Determining factors of academic library web site usage. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:2325-2334.
25. Heo J., Han I. Performance measure of information systems (IS) in evolving computing environments: An empirical investigation. Information Management 2003, 40:243-256.
26. Hong W., Thong J.Y.L., Wong W.-M., Tam K.-Y. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 2002, 18(3):97-124.
27. Hsu M., Chiu C. Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems 2004, 38:369-381.
28. Hu P.J.-H., Clark T.H.K., Ma W.W. Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information and Management 2003, 41:227-241.
29. Igbaria M., Guimaraes T., Davis G.B. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems 1995, 11(4):87-114.
30. Igbaria M., Iivari J., Maragahh H. Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information and Management 1995, 29:227-238.
31. Igbaria M., Parasuraman S., Baroudi J. A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems 1996, 13(1):127-143.
32. Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Gragg P., Cavaye A.L.M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation models. MIS Quarterly 1997, 21:279-305.
33. Ives B., Olson M.H., Baroudi J.J. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM 1983, 26:785-793.
34. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Carr C.L. Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Quarterly 2002, 26:145-166.
35. Kellar M., Watters C., Shepherd M. A field study characterizing web-based information-seeking tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58:999-1018.
36. Kim J.-A. Toward an understanding of web-based subscription database acceptance. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57:1715-1728.
37. Kim T.G., Lee J.H., Law R. An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tourism Management 2008, 29:500-513.
38. Kim Y.-M. The adoption of university library web site resources: A multigroup analysis. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2010, 61:978-993.
39. Lederer A.L., Maupin D.J., Sena M.P., Zhuang Y. The technology acceptance model and the world wide web. Decision Support Systems 2000, 29:269-282.
40. Lee Y., Kwon O. Can affective factors contribute to explain continuance intention of web-based services?. ICEC 2009: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2009, 302-310. ACM Press, New York, NY. P.Y.K. Chau, K. Lyytinen, C.-P. Wei (Eds.).
41. Lin H.-F., Lee G.-G. Determinants of success for online communities: An empirical study. Behaviour and Information Technology 2006, 25:479-488.
42. Low A. Research rules to live by: Eight strategies to ensure that students use an on-line database effectively. School Libraries in Canada 2003, 22(4):30-31.
43. Mahmood M.A., Burn J.M., Gemoets L.A., Jacquez C. Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2000, 52:751-771.
44. Mariani M.G., Curcuruto M., Gaetani I. Training opportunities, technology acceptance and job satisfaction: A case study of Italian organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning 2013, 25:455-475.
45. McGill T., Hobbs V. How students and instructors using a virtual learning environment perceive the fit between technology and task. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2008, 24:191-202.
46. Nelson R.R., Cheney P.H. Training end users: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly 1987, 11:547-559.
47. Ozkan S., Koseler R., Baykal N. Evaluating learning management systems: Adoption of hexagonal e-learning assessment model in higher education. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2009, 3:111-130.
48. Park N., Roman R., Lee S., Chung J.E. User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information Management 2009, 29:196-209.
49. Pavlou P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2003, 7(3):69-103.
50. Raymond L. The impact of computer training on the attitudes and usage behavior of small business managers. Journal of Small Business Management 1988, 26(3):8-13.
51. Robey D. User attitudes and management information system use. Academy of Management Journal 1979, 22:527-538.
52. Roca J.C., Chiu C.-M., Martínez F.J. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2006, 64:683-696.
53. Rodgers W., Negash S., Suk K. The moderating effect of on-line experience on the antecedents and consequences of on-line satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing 2005, 22:313-331.
54. Rouibah K., Hamdy H.I., Al-Enezi M.Z. Effect of management support, training, and user involvement on system usage and satisfaction in Kuwait. Industrial Management and Data Systems 2009, 109:338-356.
55. Saadé R., Galloway I. Understanding intention to use multimedia information systems for learning. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 2005, 2:287-296.
56. Saadé R.G., Nebebe F., Tan W. Viability of the technology acceptance model in multimedia learning environments: Comparative study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 2007, 37:175-184.
57. Sabherwal R., Jeyaraj A., Chowa C. Information system success: Individual and organizational determinants. Management Science 2006, 52:1849-1864.
58. Santhanam R., Sein M.K. Improving end-user proficiency: Effects of conceptual training and nature of interaction. Information Systems Research 1994, 5:378-399.
59. Schaupp L.C., Bélanger F., Fan W. Examining the success of websites beyond e-commerce: An extension of the IS success model. Journal of Computer Information Systems 2009, 49(4):42-52.
60. Shachak A., Fine S. The effect of training on biologists acceptance of bioinformatics tools: A field experiment. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59:719-730.
61. Shih H. Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior. Information Management 2004, 41:719-729.
62. Taylor S., Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995, 6:144-176.
63. Teo T., Noyes J. An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education 2011, 57:1645-1653.
64. Thompson R.L., Higgins C.A., Howell J.M. Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly 1991, 15:124-143.
65. Thomsett-Scott B., May F. How may we help you? Online education faculty tell us what they need from libraries and librarians. Journal of Librarian Administration 2009, 49:111-135.
66. Thong J.Y.L., Hong W., Tam K.-Y. Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 2002, 57:215-242.
67. Venkatesh V. Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly 1999, 23:239-260.
68. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 2000, 11:342-365.
69. Venkatesh V., Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 2008, 39:273-315.
70. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000, 46:186-204.
71. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27:425-478.
72. Wang Y.-S. Assessing e-commerce systems success: A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Journal 2008, 18:529-557.
73. Weber R.P. Basic content analysis 1990, SAGE, Newbury Park, CA. 2nd ed.
74. Wixom B.H., Todd P.A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research 2005, 16:85-102.
75. Yen C.-H., Lu H.-P. Effects of e-service quality on loyalty intention: An empirical study in online auction. Managing Service Quality 2008, 18:127-146.
76. Zhu D.-S., Lin T.C.-T., Hsu Y.-C. Using the technology acceptance model to evaluate user attitude and intention of use for online games. Total Quality Management 2012, 23:965-980.