Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 277-297

  Al Gahtani, Said S ^a   King, Malcolm ^b  

^a KING KHALID UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

END-USER COMPUTING SATISFACTION (EUCS); TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0032626827     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014492999119020     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. AJZEN, I. 1988, Attitude Structure and Behavior relations, in A. R. Partkanis, S. T. Berckler and A. G. Greenwald (eds), Attitude Structure and Function. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).
2. AJZEN, I. and FISHBEIN, M. 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall).
3. AMOROSO, D. L. and CHENEY, P. H. 1992, Quality End-User Developed Applications: Some Essential Ingredients. Data Base 23 (1), 1-11.
4. ATTEWELL, P. and RULE, J. 1984, Computing and Organizations: What we Know and What we Don't Know. Communications of the ACM, 27, 1184-1192.
5. BAILEY, J. E. and PEARSON, S. W. 1983, Development of A Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction. Management Science, 29 (5), 530-545.
6. BALDWIN, A. A., BALDWIN, D. and SEN, T. K. 1991, The Evolution and Problems of Model Management Research. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 19, 511-528.
7. BAROUDI, J. J. and ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. 1988, A Short Form Measure of User Satisfaction and Notes on Use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 4, 44-59.
8. BAROUDI, J. J., OLSON, M. H. and IVES, B. 1986, An Empirical Study of the Impact of User Involvement on System Usage and Information Satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 29 (3), 232-238.
9. BARRIER, T. and DAVIS, D. 1993, Are Graduate Students Appropriate Research Surrogates for Managers in Evaluating New IS Technology? The Case of Intelligent System Users. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 34 (2), 58-61.
10. BOLLEN, K. A. and LONG, J. S. 1993, Introduction, in K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (eds), Testing structural equation models. (London: Sage Publications, Inc.).
11. DAVIS, F. D. 1986, A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. DAVIS, F. D. 1989, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
12. DAVIS, F. D. 1986, A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. DAVIS, F. D. 1989, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
13. DAVIS, F. D. 1993, User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
14. DAVIS, F. D., BAGOZZI, R. P. and WARSHAW, P. R. 1989, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
15. DAVIS, F. D., BAGOZZI, R. P. and WARSHAW, P. R. 1992, Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111-1132.
16. DELONE, W. H. and MCLEAN, E. R. 1992, Information systems success: the quest of the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 60-95.
17. DIAMANTOPOULOS, A. 1994, Modelling with LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated, in G. Hooley and M. Hussey (eds), Quantitative Methods in Marketing. (London: Academic Press), pp. 105-136.
18. DOLK, R. D. and KONSYNSKI, B. R. 1985, Model Management in Organizations. Information and Management, 9, 35-47.
19. DOLL, W. J. and TORKZADEH, G. 1988, The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12 (2), 259-274.
20. DOLL, W. J. and TORKZADEH, G. 1991, The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. MIS Quarterly, March, 5-10.
21. DOLL, W. J., XIA, W. and TORKZADEH, G. 1994, A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18, 453-461.
22. EIN-DOR, P. and SEGEV, E. 1982, Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence. MIS Quarterly, 6 (3), 55-68.
23. ETEZADI-AMOLI, J. and FARHOOMAND, A. 1996, A Structural Model of End-User Computing Satisfaction and User Performance. Information and Management, 30 (2), 65-73.
24. FISHBEIN, M. and AJZEN, I. 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
25. HAYDUK, L. A. 1987, Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances. (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press).
26. HELLEVIK, O. 1984, Introduction to Causal Analysis. (London: Allen and Unwin Publishers).
27. HENDRICKSON, A. R., GLORFELD, K. and CRONAN, T. P. 1994, On the Repeated Test-Retest Reliability of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument: A Comment. Decision Sciences, 25 (4), 655-667.
28. IGBARIA, M. 1990, End-User Computing Effectiveness: A Structural Equation Model. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 18 (6), 637-652.
29. IGBARIA, M. 1993, User Acceptance of Microcomputer Technology: An Empirical Test. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 21 (1), 73-90.
30. IGBARIA, M. and CHAKRABARTI, A. 1990, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Microcomputer Use. Behaviour and Information Technology, 9, 229-241.
31. IGBARIA, M., PAVRI, F. N. and HUFF, S. L. 1989, Microcomputer Applications: An Empirical Look at Usage. Information and Management, 16 (4), 187-196.
32. IGBARIA, M., SCHIFFMAN, S. J. and WIECKOWSKI, T. J. 1994, The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 13, 349-361.
33. IGBARIA, M., PARASRAMAN, S. and BAROUDI, J. J. 1996, A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13 (1), 127-143.
34. IVES, B. and OLSON, M. H. 1984, User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research. Management Science, 30, 586-603.
35. IVES, B., OLSON, M. and BAROUDI, J. 1983, The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26, 785-793.
36. JENKKINS, A. M. and RICKETTS, J. A. 1985, The Development of an MIS Satisfaction Questionnaire: An Instrument for Evaluating User Satisfaction with Turnkey Decision Support Systems. Discussion Paper #296, School of Business, Indiana Univ., Bloomington.
37. JORESKOG, K. G. and SORBOM, D. 1986, LISREL-Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. (Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software, Inc.).
38. JORESKOG, K. G. and SORBOM, D. 1989, LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, 2nd edn. (Chicago: SPSS Inc.).
39. KENNY, D. A. 1979, Correlations and Causality. (New York: John Wiley and Sons).
40. LEE, D. M. 1986, Usage Pattern and Sources of Assistance for Personal Computer Users. MIS Quarterly, 10 (4), 313-325.
41. LI, C. C. 1986, Path Analysis: A Primer.(Pacific Grove: The Boxwood Press).
42. LUCAS, H. C. 1975, Performance and The Use of An Information System. Management Science, 21 (8), 908-919.
43. LUCAS, H. C. 1978, Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation. MIS Quarterly, 2, 27-41.
44. MASON, D. and KEANE, D. 1989, Spreadsheets: Solution or Problem. INTERFACE, October, 82-84.
45. MCGUIRE, W. J. 1969, The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 3. (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley), pp. 136-314.
46. MELONE, N. P. 1990, A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research. Management Science, 36 (1), 76-91.
47. MOORE, G. C. and BENBASAT, I. 1991, Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2 (3), 192-222.
48. NELSON, R. R. and CHENEY, P. H. 1987, Training End Users: An Exploratory Study. MIS Quarterly, 11, 547-559.
49. PEDHAZUR, E. J. 1982, Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).
50. RIVARD, S. and HUFF, S. 1988, Factors of Success for End-User Computing. Communications of the ACM, 31 (5), 552-561.
51. ROBEY, D. 1979, User Attitudes and Management Information Systems Use. Acad. Mgmt J., 22 (3), 527-538.
52. ROBEY, D. and ZELLER, R. L. 1978, Factors Affecting the Success and Failure of an Information System for Product Quality. Interfaces, 8, 70-75.
53. ROSS, D. R. 1975, Direct, indirect, and spurious effects: comments on causal analysis of interorganizational relations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 295-297.
54. SRINIVASAN, A. 1985, Alternative Measures of System Effectiveness: Associations and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 9 (3), 243-253.
55. SWANSON, E. B. 1982, Measuring User Attitudes in MIS Research: a Review. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 10, 157-165.
56. SWANSON, E. B. 1988, Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap Between Design and Utilization. (Homewood, Ill. IRWIN, Inc.).
57. SZAJNA, B. 1996, Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science, 42 (1), 85-92.
58. THOMPSON, R. L., HIGGINS, C. A. and HOWELL, J. M. 1991, Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15 (1), 125-143.
59. TORKZADEH, G. and DOLL, W. J. 1991, Test-Retest Reliability of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. Decision Sciences, 22 (1), 26-37.
60. TORKZADEH, G. and DWYER, D. J. 1994, A Path Analytic Study of Determinants of Information System Usage. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 22 (4), 339-148.
61. TRICE, A. W. and TREACY, M. E. 1988, Utilization as a Dependent Variable in MIS Research. Data Base, 19 (3/4), 33-41.
62. ZMUD, R. W. and BOYNTON, A. C. 1991, Survey Measures and Instruments in MIS: Inventory and Appraisal, in K. L. Kraemer (ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods-Volume 3 (Boston: Harvard Business School), pp. 149-180.