Reduced matrix rigidity promotes neonatal cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation, proliferation and clonal expansion

eLife

Volumn 4, Issue AUGUST2015, 2015, Pages

  Yahalom Ronen, Yfat ^a   Rajchman, Dana ^a   Sarig, Rachel ^a   Geiger, Benjamin ^a   Tzahor, Eldad ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL DEDIFFERENTIATION; CELL MATURATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOKINESIS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HEART MUSCLE CELL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; RAT; RIGIDITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CARDIAC MUSCLE CELL; CELL CULTURE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; PHYSIOLOGY; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; CELL DEDIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MICE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOCYTES, CARDIAC; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 84940995292     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07455     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Agah R, Frenkel PA, French BA, Michael LH, Overbeek PA, Schneider MD. 1997. Gene recombination in postmitotic cells. Targeted expression of Cre recombinase provokes cardiac-restricted, site-specific rearrangement in adult ventricular muscle in vivo. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 100:169–179. doi: 10.1172/JCI119509.
2. Ahuja P, Sdek P, MacLellan WR. 2007. Cardiac myocyte cell cycle control in development, disease, and regeneration. Physiological Reviews 87:521–544. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2006.
3. Ausoni S, Sartore S. 2009. From fish to amphibians to mammals: in search of novel strategies to optimize cardiac regeneration. The Journal of Cell Biology 184:357–364. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810094.
4. Bajaj P, Tang X, Saif TA, Bashir R. 2010. Stiffness of the substrate influences the phenotype of embryonic chicken cardiac myocytes. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A 95:1261–1269. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32951.
5. Berry MF, Engler AJ, Woo YJ, Pirolli TJ, Bish LT, Jayasankar V, Morine KJ, Gardner TJ, Discher DE, Sweeney HL. 2006. Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology 290:H2196–H2203. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01017.2005.
6. Bersell K, Arab S, Haring B, Kuhn B. 2009. Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury. Cell 138:257–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.060.
7. Bhana B, Iyer RK, Chen WL, Zhao R, Sider KL, Likhitpanichkul M, Simmons CA, Radisic M. 2010. Influence of substrate stiffness on the phenotype of heart cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 105:1148–1160. doi: 10.1002/bit.22647.
8. Bray MA, Sheehy SP, Parker KK. 2008. Sarcomere alignment is regulated by myocyte shape. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 65:641–651. doi: 10.1002/cm.20290.
9. Cadart C, Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz E, Le Berre M, Piel M, Matthews HK. 2014. Exploring the function of cell shape and size during mitosis. Developmental Cell 29:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.009.
10. D’Uva G, Aharonov A, Lauriola M, Kain D, Yahalom-Ronen Y, Carvalho S, Weisinger K, Bassat E, Rajchman D, Yifa O, Lysenko M, Konfino T, Hegesh J, Brenner O, Neeman M, Yarden Y, Leor J, Sarig R, Harvey RP, Tzahor E. 2015. ERBB2 triggers mammalian heart regeneration by promoting cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature Cell Biology 17:627–638. doi: 10.1038/ncb3149.
11. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. 2005. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310: 1139–1143. doi: 10.1126/science.1116995.
12. Dou Y, Arlock P, Arner A. 2007. Blebbistatin specifically inhibits actin-myosin interaction in mouse cardiac muscle. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology 293:C1148–C1153. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00551.2006.
13. Engler AJ, Carag-Krieger C, Johnson CP, Raab M, Tang HY, Speicher DW, Sanger JW, Sanger JM, Discher DE. 2008. Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating. Journal of Cell Science 121:3794–3802. doi: 10.1242/jcs.029678.
14. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126: 677–689. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044.
15. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. 2009. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 10:21–33. doi: 10.1038/nrm2593.
16. Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KE, Sacco A, Leonardi NA, Kraft P, Nguyen NK, Thrun S, Lutolf MP, Blau HM. 2010. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 329:1078–1081. doi: 10.1126/science.1191035.
17. Heng YW, Koh CG. 2010. Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and the cell division cycle. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 42:1622–1633. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.007.
18. Jacot JG, Martin JC, Hunt DL. 2010. Mechanobiology of cardiomyocyte development. Journal of Biomechanics 43: 93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.014.
19. Jacot JG, McCulloch AD, Omens JH. 2008. Substrate stiffness affects the functional maturation of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Biophysical Journal 95:3479–3487. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.124545.
20. Janmey PA, Miller RT. 2011. Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease. Journal of Cell Science 124:9–18. doi: 10.1242/jcs.071001.
21. Jopling C, Boue S, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 2011. Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation and reprogramming: three routes to regeneration. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 12:79–89. doi: 10.1038/nrm3043.
22. Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, Raya A, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 2010. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464:606–609. doi: 10.1038/nature08899.
23. Klein EA, Yin L, Kothapalli D, Castagnino P, Byfield FJ, Xu T, Levental I, Hawthorne E, Janmey PA, Assoian RK. 2009. Cell-cycle control by physiological matrix elasticity and in vivo tissue stiffening. Current Biology 19: 1511–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.069.
24. Lancaster OM, Baum B. 2014. Shaping up to divide: coordinating actin and microtubule cytoskeletal remodelling during mitosis. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 34:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.02.015.
25. Lancaster OM, Le Berre M, Dimitracopoulos A, Bonazzi D, Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz E, Picone R, Duke T, Piel M, Baum B. 2013. Mitotic rounding alters cell geometry to ensure efficient bipolar spindle formation. Developmental Cell 25: 270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.03.014.
26. Li F, Wang X, Bunger PC, Gerdes AM. 1997a. Formation of binucleated cardiac myocytes in rat heart: I. Role of actin-myosin contractile ring. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 29:1541–1551. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0381.
27. Li F, Wang X, Capasso JM, Gerdes AM. 1996. Rapid transition of cardiac myocytes from hyperplasia to hypertrophy during postnatal development. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 28:1737–1746. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1996.0163.
28. Li F, Wang X, Gerdes AM. 1997b. Formation of binucleated cardiac myocytes in rat heart: II. Cytoskeletal organisation. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 29:1553–1565. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0403.
29. Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, Lein ES, Zeng H. 2010. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nature Neuroscience 13:133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467.
30. Majkut S, Dingal PC, Discher DE. 2014. Stress sensitivity and mechanotransduction during heart development. Current Biology 24:R495–R501. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.027.
31. Naqvi N, Li M, Calvert JW, Tejada T, Lambert JP, Wu J, Kesteven SH, Holman SR, Matsuda T, Lovelock JD, Howard WW, Iismaa SE, Chan AY, Crawford BH, Wagner MB, Martin DI, Lefer DJ, Graham RM, Husain A. 2014. A proliferative burst during preadolescence establishes the final cardiomyocyte number. Cell 157:795–807. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.035.
32. Naqvi N, Li M, Yahiro E, Graham RM, Husain A. 2009. Insights into the characteristics of mammalian cardiomyocyte terminal differentiation shown through the study of mice with a dysfunctional c-kit. Pediatric Cardiology 30: 651–658. doi: 10.1007/s00246-008-9366-1.
33. Noorman M, van der Heyden MA, van Veen TA, Cox MG, Hauer RN, de Bakker JM, van Rijen HV. 2009. Cardiac cell-cell junctions in health and disease: electrical versus mechanical coupling. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 47:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.03.016.
34. Pelham RJ Jr., Wang Y. 1997. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 94:13661–13665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13661.
35. Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN, Sadek HA. 2011. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331:1078–1080. doi: 10.1126/science.1200708.
36. Poss KD. 2007. Getting to the heart of regeneration in zebrafish. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 18: 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.11.009.
37. Poss KD, Wilson LG, Keating MT. 2002. Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 298:2188–2190. doi: 10.1126/science.1077857.
38. Prager-Khoutorsky M, Lichtenstein A, Krishnan R, Rajendran K, Mayo A, Kam Z, Geiger B, Bershadsky AD. 2011. Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing. Nature Cell Biology 13:1457–1465. doi: 10.1038/ncb2370.
39. Sheikh F, Ross RS, Chen J. 2009. Cell-cell connection to cardiac disease. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 19: 182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2009.12.001.
40. Shin JW, Swift J, Spinler KR, Discher DE. 2011. Myosin-II inhibition and soft 2D matrix maximize multinucleation and cellular projections typical of platelet-producing megakaryocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 108:11458–11463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017474108.
41. Shneyvays V, Mamedova LK, Leshem D, Korkus A, Shainberg A. 2002. Insights into the cardioprotective function of adenosine A(1) and A(3) receptors. Experimental and Clinical Cardiology 7:138–145.
42. Snippert HJ, van der Flier LG, Sato T, van Es JH, van den Born M, Kroon-Veenboer C, Barker N, Klein AM, van Rheenen J, Simons BD, Clevers H. 2010. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143:134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.016.
43. Soonpaa MH, Field LJ. 1998. Survey of studies examining mammalian cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis. Circulation Research 83:15–26. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.83.1.15.
44. Soonpaa MH, Kim KK, Pajak L, Franklin M, Field LJ. 1996. Cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis and binucleation during murine development. The American Journal of Physiology 271:H2183-H2189.
45. Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A, Harada T, Dingal PC, Pinter J, Pajerowski JD, Spinler KR, Shin JW, Tewari M, Rehfeldt F, Speicher DW, Discher DE. 2013. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341:1240104. doi: 10.1126/science.1240104.
46. Virag JI, Murry CE. 2003. Myofibroblast and endothelial cell proliferation during murine myocardial infarct repair. The American Journal of Pathology 163:2433–2440. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63598-5.
47. Vogel V, Sheetz M. 2006. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 7:265–275. doi: 10.1038/nrm1890.
48. Walsh S, Ponten A, Fleischmann BK, Jovinge S. 2010. Cardiomyocyte cell cycle control and growth estimation in vivo–an analysis based on cardiomyocyte nuclei. Cardiovascular Research 86:365–373. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvq005.
49. Zebrowski DC, Engel FB. 2013. The cardiomyocyte cell cycle in hypertrophy, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration. Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology 165:67–96. doi: 10.1007/112_2013_12.