Bioprinting for cancer research

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 504-513

  Knowlton, Stephanie ^a   Onal, Sevgi ^a   Yu, Chu Hsiang ^b   Zhao, Jean J ^c,d   Tasoglu, Savas ^a,b  

^a University of Connecticut   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

3D ARCHITECTURES; ANTICANCER DRUG; BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULE; CANCER RESEARCH; CELL MATRIX INTERACTIONS; LASER TECHNOLOGIES; MICROEXTRUSION; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

DISEASES;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD;

BIOPRINTING; CANCER MODEL; CANCER RESEARCH; CELL DENSITY; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL VIABILITY; DRUG SCREENING; HELA CELL LINE; HUMAN; HYDRODYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; TUMOR SPHEROID; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEOPLASM;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BIOPRINTING; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84940450098     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.007     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. (2014) World Cancer Report 2014, IARC. B.W. Stewart, C.P. Wild (Eds.).
2. Berger M.F., et al. The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature 2011, 470:214-220.
3. Palanisamy N., et al. Rearrangements of the RAF kinase pathway in prostate cancer, gastric cancer and melanoma. Nat. Med. 2010, 16:793-798.
4. Ridky T.W., et al. Invasive three-dimensional organotypic neoplasia from multiple normal human epithelia. Nat. Med. 2010, 16:1450-1455.
5. Ghosh S., et al. Three-dimensional culture of melanoma cells profoundly affects gene expression profile: a high density oligonucleotide array study. J. Cell. Physiol. 2005, 204:522-531.
6. Kim B.J., et al. Cooperative roles of SDF-1α and EGF gradients on tumor cell migration revealed by a robust 3D microfluidic model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e68422.
7. Zervantonakis I.K., et al. Three-dimensional microfluidic model for tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:13515-13520.
8. Friedl P., Wolf K. Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188:11-19.
9. Li C.L., et al. Survival advantages of multicellular spheroids vs. monolayers of HepG2 cells in vitro. Oncol. Rep. 2008, 20:1465-1471.
10. Chopra V., et al. Three-dimensional endothelial-tumor epithelial cell interactions in human cervical cancers. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 1997, 33:432-442.
11. Loessner D., et al. Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:8494-8506.
12. Zhao Y., et al. Three-dimensional printing of HeLa cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication 2014, 6:035001.
13. Wang C., et al. Three-dimensional in vitro cancer models: a short review. Biofabrication 2014, 6:022001.
14. Kruth J-P. Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Techn. 1991, 40:603-614.
15. Heller, T.B. et al. Quadrax Corp. Method of and apparatus for forming a solid three-dimensional article from a liquid medium, WO 1991012120 A1.
16. Freedman D.H. Layer by layer. Technol. Rev. 2012, 115:50-53.
17. Demirci U., Montesano G. Single cell epitaxy by acoustic picolitre droplets. Lab Chip 2007, 7:1139-1145.
18. Mironov V., et al. Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21:157-161.
19. Moon S., et al. Layer by layer three-dimensional tissue epitaxy by cell-laden hydrogel droplets. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2010, 16:157-166.
20. Xu F., et al. A droplet-based building block approach for bladder smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation. Biofabrication 2010, 2:014105.
21. Mironov V., et al. Organ printing: promises and challenges. Regen. Med. 2008, 3:93-103.
22. Hamid Q., et al. Fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds using precision extrusion deposition with an assisted cooling device. Biofabrication 2011, 3:034109.
23. Tasoglu S., Demirci U. Bioprinting for stem cell research. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31:10-19.
24. Tasoglu S., et al. Untethered micro-robotic coding of three-dimensional material composition. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3124.
25. Tasoglu S., et al. Guided and magnetic self-assembly of tunable magnetoceptive gels. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:4702.
26. Tasoglu S., et al. Magnetic levitational assembly for living material fabrication. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, Published online April 14, 2015. 10.1002/adhm.201500092.
27. Guven S., et al. Multiscale assembly for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33:269-279.
28. Chen P., et al. Microscale assembly directed by liquid-based template. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26:5936-5941.
29. Tasoglu S., et al. Paramagnetic levitational assembly of hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25:1137-1143. 1081.
30. Xu F., et al. Three-dimensional magnetic assembly of microscale hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:4254-4260.
31. Xu F., et al. The assembly of cell-encapsulating microscale hydrogels using acoustic waves. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7847-7855.
32. Gurkan U.A., et al. Emerging technologies for assembly of microscale hydrogels. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2012, 1:149-158.
33. Junttila M.R., de Sauvage F.J. Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response. Nature 2013, 501:346-354.
34. Boland T., et al. Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering. Biotechnol. J. 2006, 1:910-917.
35. Nakamura M., et al. Biocompatible inkjet printing technique for designed seeding of individual living cells. Tissue Eng. 2005, 11:1658-1666.
36. Fedorovich N.E., et al. Evaluation of photocrosslinked Lutrol hydrogel for tissue printing applications. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:1689-1696.
37. Chang C.C., et al. Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater. 2011, 98:160-170.
38. Khalil S., Sun W. Biopolymer deposition for freeform fabrication of hydrogel tissue constructs. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2007, 27:469-478.
39. Chang R., et al. Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing. Tissue Eng. Part A 2008, 14:41-48.
40. Odde D.J., Renn M.J. Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17:385-389.
41. Nahmias Y., et al. Laser-guided direct writing for three-dimensional tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 92:129-136.
42. Guillotin B., et al. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials 2010, 31:7250-7256.
43. Gaebel R., et al. Patterning human stem cells and endothelial cells with laser printing for cardiac regeneration. Biomaterials 2011, 32:9218-9230.
44. Barron J.A., et al. Application of laser printing to mammalian cells. Thin Solid Films 2004, 453:383-387.
45. Cohen D.L., et al. Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12:1325-1335.
46. Jakab K., et al. Three-dimensional tissue constructs built by bioprinting. Biorheology 2006, 43:509-513.
47. Visser J., et al. Biofabrication of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs. Biofabrication 2013, 5:035007.
48. Nahmias Y., Odde D.J. Micropatterning of living cells by laser-guided direct writing: application to fabrication of hepatic-endothelial sinusoid-like structures. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1:2288-2296.
49. Colina M., et al. Laser-induced forward transfer of liquids: study of the droplet ejection process. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99:7.
50. Kattamis N.T., et al. Laser direct write printing of sensitive and robust light emitting organic molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94:3.
51. Lu Y., et al. A digital micro-mirror device-based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 77:396-405.
52. Soman P., et al. Cancer cell migration within 3D layer-by-layer microfabricated photocrosslinked PEG scaffolds with tunable stiffness. Biomaterials 2012, 33:7064-7070.
53. Dababneh A.B., Ozbolat I.T. Bioprinting technology: a current state-of-the-art review. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2014, 136:061016.
54. Xu F., et al. A three-dimensional in vitro ovarian cancer coculture model using a high-throughput cell patterning platform. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6:204-212.
55. Murphy S.V., Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:773-785.
56. Chung S., et al. Microfluidic platforms for studies of angiogenesis, cell migration, and cell-cell interactions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38:1164-1177.
57. Nguyen-Ngoc K.V., et al. ECM microenvironment regulates collective migration and local dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E2595-E2604.
58. King S.M., et al. Development of 3D bioprinted human breast cancer for in vitro drug screening. Cancer Res. 2014, 74:2034.
59. Kolesky D.B., et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26:3124-3130.
60. Hansen C.J., et al. High-throughput printing via microvascular multinozzle arrays. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25:96-102.
61. Chen Y., et al. Enhancing and suppressing effects of an inner droplet on deformation of a double emulsion droplet under shear. Lab Chip 2015, 15:1255-1261.
62. Utada A.S., et al. Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapillary device. Science 2005, 308:537-541.
63. Demirci U., Montesano G. Cell encapsulating droplet vitrification. Lab Chip 2007, 7:1428-1433.
64. Wettability 1993, Marcel Dekker. J.C. Berg (Ed.).
65. Muradoglu M., Tasoglu S. A front-tracking method for computational modeling of impact and spreading of viscous droplets on solid walls. Comput. Fluids 2010, 39:615-625.
66. Tasoglu S., et al. Impact of a compound droplet on a flat surface: a model for single cell epitaxy. Phys. Fluids 2010, 22:082103.
67. Tasoglu S., et al. Transient swelling, spreading and drug delivery by a dissolved anti-HIV microbicide-bearing film. Phys. Fluids 2013, 25:031901.
68. Tasoglu S., et al. The effects of inhomogeneous boundary dilution on the coating flow of an anti-HIV microbicide vehicle. Phys. Fluids 2011, 23:093101.
69. Tasoglu S., et al. The effect of soluble surfactant on the transient motion of a buoyancy-driven bubble. Phys. Fluids 2008, 20:040805.
70. Tasoglu S., et al. The consequences of yield stress on deployment of a non-Newtonian anti-HIV microbicide gel. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 2011, 166:1116-1122.
71. Tasoglu S., et al. Transient spreading and swelling behavior of a gel deploying an anti-HIV microbicide. J. Nonnewton. Fluid Mech. 2012, 187:36-42.
72. Keenan T.M., Folch A. Biomolecular gradients in cell culture systems. Lab Chip 2008, 8:34-57.
73. Weiss L.E., et al. Bayesian computer-aided experimental design of heterogeneous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Comput. Aided Des. 2005, 37:1127-1139.
74. Huang T.Q., et al. 3D printing of biomimetic microstructures for cancer cell migration. Biomed. Microdevices 2014, 16:127-132.
75. Hobbs S.K., et al. Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:4607-4612.
76. Yuan F., et al. Microvascular permeability and interstitial penetration of sterically stabilized (stealth) liposomes in a human tumor xenograft. Cancer Res. 1994, 54:3352-3356.
77. Baish J.W., et al. Scaling rules for diffusive drug delivery in tumor and normal tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:1799-1803.
78. Nagy J.A., et al. Why are tumour blood vessels abnormal and why is it important to know?. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 100:865-869.
79. Chauhan V.P., et al. Normalization of tumour blood vessels improves the delivery of nanomedicines in a size-dependent manner. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7:383-388.
80. He Z.Q., Xiong L.Z. Fabrication of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres and degradation characteristics in vitro. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B: Phy. 2011, 50:1682-1690.
81. Hribar K.C., et al. Nonlinear 3D projection printing of concave hydrogel microstructures for long-term multicellular spheroid and embryoid body culture. Lab Chip 2015, 15:2412-2418.
82. Snyder J.E., et al. Bioprinting cell-laden matrigel for radioprotection study of liver by pro-drug conversion in a dual-tissue microfluidic chip. Biofabrication 2011, 3:034112.
83. Unger C., et al. Modeling human carcinomas: physiologically relevant 3D models to improve anti-cancer drug development. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 79-80:50-67.
84. Runge A., et al. An inducible hepatocellular carcinoma model for preclinical evaluation of antiangiogenic therapy in adult mice. Cancer Res. 2014, 74:4157-4169.
85. Festing S., Wilkinson R. The ethics of animal research. Talking point on the use of animals in scientific research. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8:526-530.
86. Singh M., et al. Microsphere-based seamless scaffolds containing macroscopic gradients of encapsulated factors for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2008, 14:299-309.
87. Demirbag B., et al. Advanced cell therapies with and without scaffolds. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6:1437-1453.
88. Guillemot F., et al. High-throughput laser printing of cells and biomaterials for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2010, 6:2494-2500.
89. Malda J., et al. 25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 2013, 25:5011-5028.