A systematic review of open government data initiatives

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 399-418

  Attard, Judie ^a   Orlandi, Fabrizio ^a   Scerri, Simon ^a   Auer, Sören ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consuming; Data portals; Government data; OGD life cycle; Open data; Openness; Publishing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940121582     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Alexopoulos, C., Spiliotopoulou, L., Charalabidis, Y., Open data movement in greece: A case study on open government data sources. Proceedings of the 17th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, 2013, PCI ‘13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 279–286, 10.1145/2491845.2491876.
2. Alexopoulos, C., Zuiderwijk, A., Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Janssen, M., Designing a second generation of open data platforms: Integrating open data and social media. Electronic Government — 13th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2014, Dublin, Ireland, September 1-3, 2014. Proceedings, 2014, 230–241, 10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_19.
3. Arcelus, J., Framework for useful transparency websites for citizens. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2012, ICEGOV ‘12, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 83–86, 10.1145/2463728.2463749.
4. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J., A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4:2 (2013), 135–148, 10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9.
5. Bertot, J.C., Butler, B.S., Travis, D., Local big data: The role of libraries in building community data infrastructures. 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, dg.o ‘14, Aguascalientes, Mexico, June 18-21, 2014, 2014, 17–23, 10.1145/2612733.2612762.
6. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T., Linked data — The story so far. International Journal Semantic Web Information Systems 5:3 (2009), 1–22.
7. Bogdanović-Dinić, S., Veljković, N., Stoimenov, L., How open are public government data? An assessment of seven open data portals. Rodríguez-Bolívar, M.P., (eds.) Measuring E-government Efficiency, Public Administration and Information Technology, vol. 5, 2014, Springer, New York, 25–44, 10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_3.
8. Böhm, C., Freitag, M., Heise, A., Lehmann, C., Mascher, A., Naumann, F., Ercegovac, V., Hernandez, M., Haase, P., Schmidt, M., Govwild: Integrating open government data for transparency. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, 2012, WWW ‘12 Companion, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321–324, 10.1145/2187980.2188039.
9. Bovens, M., Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal 13:4 (2007), 447–468, 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x.
10. Carroll, J.J., Bizer, C., Hayes, P., Stickler, P., Named graphs, provenance and trust. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2005, WWW ‘05, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 613–622, 10.1145/1060745.1060835.
11. Chan, C.M., From open data to open innovation strategies: Creating e-services using open government data. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 0, 2013, 1890–1899.
12. Conradie, P., Choenni, S., Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2012, ICEGOV ‘12, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5–13, 10.1145/2463728.2463731.
13. Davies, T., Frank, M., there's no such thing as raw data’: Exploring the socio-technical life of a government dataset. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 2013, WebSci ‘13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75–78, 10.1145/2464464.2464472.
14. Debattista, J., Lange, C., Auer, S., Representing dataset quality metadata using multi-dimensional views. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Semantic Systems, 2014, SEM ‘14, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 92–99, 10.1145/2660517.2660525.
15. DiFranzo, D., Graves, A., Erickson, J., Ding, L., Michaelis, J., Lebo, T., Patton, E., Williams, G., Li, X., Zheng, J., Flores, J., McGuinness, D., Hendler, J., The web is my back-end: Creating mashups with linked open government data. Wood, D., (eds.) Linking Government Data, 2011, Springer, New York, 205–219, 10.1007/978-1-4614-1767-5_10.
16. dos Santos Brito, K., Silva Costa, M., Cardoso Garcia, V., Romero de Lemos Meira, S., Experiences integrating heterogeneous government open data sources to deliver services and promote transparency in Brazil. Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 2014 IEEE 38th Annual, 2014, July, 606–607.
17. dos Santos Brito, K., dos Santos Neto, M., da Silva Costa, M.A., Garcia, V.C., de LemosMeira, S.R., Using parliamentary brazilian open data to improve transparencyand public participation in brazil. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2014, dg.o ‘14,ACM, New York, NY, USA, 171–177, 10.1145/2612733.2612769.
18. dos Santos Brito, K., da Silva Costa, M.A., Garcia, V.C., de Lemos Meira, S.R., Brazilian government open data: Implementation, challenges, and potential opportunities. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2014, dg.o ‘14, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11–16, 10.1145/2612733.2612770.
19. Dulong de Rosnay, M., Janssen, K., Legal and institutional challenges for opening data across public sectors: Towards common policy solutions. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research 9 (09 2014), 1–14 [http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext pid=S0718-18762014000300002 nrm=iso].
20. Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T., Hanssen, G.K., Applying systematic reviews to diverse study types: An experience report. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2007, ESEM ‘07, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 225–234, 10.1109/ESEM.2007.21.
21. Eckartz, S., Hofman, W., Van Veenstra, A., A decision model for data sharing. Janssen, M., Scholl, H., Wimmer, M., Bannister, F., (eds.) Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8653, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 253–264, 10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_21.
22. Edelmann, N., Höchtl, J., Sachs, M., Collaboration for open innovation processes in public administrations. Charalabidis, Y., Koussouris, S., (eds.) Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance, 2012, Springer, 21–37 (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/books/daglib/0028914.html#EdelmannHS12).
23. Egger-Peitler, I., Polzer, T., Open data: European ambitions and local efforts. Experiences from austria. Gascó-Hernández, M., (eds.) Open Government, Public Administration and Information Technology, vol. 4, 2014, Springer, New York, 137–154, 10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_9.
24. Foulonneau, M., Martin, S., Turki, S., How open data are turned into services?. Snene, M., Leonard, M., (eds.) Exploring Services Science, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 169, 2014, Springer International Publishing, 31–39, 10.1007/978-3-319-04810-9_3.
25. Fuentes-Enriquez, R., Rojas-Romero, Y., Developing accountability, transparency and government efficiency through mobile apps: The case of mexico. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2013, ICEGOV ‘13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 313–316, 10.1145/2591888.2591944.
26. González, J.C., Garcia, J., Cortés, F., Carpy, D., Government 2.0: A conceptual framework and a case study using mexican data for assessing the evolution towards open governments. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2014, dg.o ‘14, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 124–136, 10.1145/2612733.2612742.
27. Hendler, J., Holm, J., Musialek, C., Thomas, G., Us government linked open data: Semantic.data.gov. IEEE Intelligent Systems 27:3 (2012), 25–31.
28. Hofman, W., Rajagopal, M., A technical framework for data sharing. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research 9 (2014, 09), 45–58 (http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext pid=S0718-18762014000300005 nrm=iso).
29. Höchtl, J., Reichstädter, P., Linked open data — A means for public sector information management. Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M., (eds.) EGOVIS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6866, 2011, Springer, 330–343 [http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egov/egovis2011.html#HochtlR11].
30. Janev, V., Mijović, V., Paunović, D., Milošević, U., Modeling, fusion and exploration of regional statistics and indicators with linked data tools. Ko, A., Francesconi, E., (eds.) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8650, 2014, Springer International Publishing, 208–221, 10.1007/978-3-319-10178-1_17.
31. Jetzek, T., Avital, M., Bjørn-Andersen, N., Generating sustainable value from open data in a sharing society. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Nielsen, P., (eds.) Creating Value for All Through IT, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 429, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 62–82, 10.1007/978-3-662-43459-8_5.
32. Jiříček, Z., Di Massimo, F., Microsoft open government data initiative (ogdi), eye on earth case study. Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Denzer, R., (eds.) Environmental Software Systems. Frameworks of eEnvironment, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 359, 2011, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 26–32, 10.1007/978-3-642-22285-6_3.
33. Juran, J.M., Juran's quality handbook. 4th edn, 1974, Mcgraw-Hill (Tx).
34. Kalampokis, E., Hausenblas, M., Tarabanis, K.A., Combining social and government open data for participatory decision-making. Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H., (eds.) ePart. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6847, 2011, Springer, 36–47 [http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/epart/epart2011.html#KalampokisHT11].
35. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K., A classification scheme for open government data: Towards linking decentralised data. International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology 6:3 (Jun 2011), 266–285, 10.1504/IJWET.2011.040725.
36. Kitchenham, B., Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Tech. rep, 2004, Departament of Computer Science, Keele University.
37. Kučera, J., Chlapek, D., Nečaský, M., Open government data catalogs: Current approaches and quality perspective. Technology-Enabled Innovation for Democracy, Government and Governance, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8061, 2013, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 152–166, 10.1007/978-3-642-40160-2_13.
38. Layne, K., Lee, J., Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18:2 (2001), 122–136 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X01000661.].
39. Lin, C., Yang, H.C., Data quality assessment on taiwan's open data sites. Wang, L.L., June, J., Lee, C.H., Okuhara, K., Yang, H.C., (eds.) Multidisciplinary Social Networks Research, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 473, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 325–333, 10.1007/978-3-662-45071-0_26.
40. Liu, Q., Bai, Q., Ding, L., Pho, H., Chen, Y., Kloppers, C., McGuinness, D., Lemon, D., de Souza, P., Fitch, P., Fox, P., Linking australian government data for sustainability science — A case study. Wood, D., (eds.) Linking Government Data, 2011, Springer, New York, 181–204, 10.1007/978-1-4614-1767-5_9.
41. López-Ayllón, S., Arellano Gault, D., Estudio en materia de transparencia de otros sujetos obligados por la Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública Gubernamental. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas: Instituto Federal de Acceso a la Información: UNAM, 2008, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurdicas.
42. Lourenço, R.P., Open government portals assessment: A transparency for accountability perspective. Wimmer, M., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., (eds.) EGOV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8074, 2013, Springer, 62–74 [http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egov/egov2013.html#Lourenco13].
43. Lourenço, R., Serra, L., An online transparency for accountability maturity model. Janssen, M., Scholl, H., Wimmer, M., Bannister, F., (eds.) Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8653, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 35–46, 10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_3.
44. von Lucke, J., Große, K., Open government collaboration. Gascó-Hernández, M., (eds.) Open Government, Public Administration and Information Technology, 4, 2014, Springer, New York, 189–204, 10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_12.
45. Maali, F., Cyganiak, R., Peristeras, V., Enabling interoperability of government data catalogues. Wimmer, M., Chappelet, J.L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., (eds.) EGOV Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, Springer, 339–350.
46. Marienfeld, F., Schieferdecker, I., Lapi, E., Tcholtchev, N., Metadata aggregation at govdata.de: An experience report. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 2013, WikiSym ‘13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21:1–21:5, 10.1145/2491055.2491077.
47. Martin, S., Foulonneau, M., Turki, S., Ihadjadene, M., Open data: Barriers, risks, and opportunities. European Conference on eGovernment, Como, Italy, 2013 [June 13-14].
48. Martin, S., Foulonneau, M., Turki, S., 1-5 stars: Metadata on the openness level of open data sets in europe. Garoufallou, E., Greenberg, J., (eds.) MTSR. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 390, 2013, Springer, 234–245 http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/mtsr/mtsr2013.html#MartinFT13.
49. Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M.M., Vaz, J.C., de Souza, C.A., Anti-corruption online monitoring systems in brazil. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2012, ICEGOV ‘12, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 419–425, 10.1145/2463728.2463809.
50. Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M.M., Vaz, J.C., New perspectives for electronic government in brazil: The adoption of open government data in national and subnational governments of brazil. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2012, ICEGOV ‘12, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 22–29, 10.1145/2463728.2463734.
51. Meijer, R., Conradie, P., Choenni, S., Reconciling contradictions of open data regarding transparency, privacy, security and trust. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research 9 (09 2014), 32–44 [http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext pid=S0718-18762014000300004 nrm=is].
52. Mercado-Lara, E., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Open government and data intermediaries: The case of aiddata. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2014, dg.o ‘14, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 335–336, 10.1145/2612733.2612789.
53. Mutuku, L.N., Colaco, J., Increasing kenyan open data consumption: A design thinking approach. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2012, ICEGOV ‘12, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18–21, 10.1145/2463728.2463733.
54. Ochoa, X., Duval, E., Quality metrics for learning object metadata. Pearson, E., Bohman, P., (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006, June 2006, AACE, Chesapeake, VA, 1004–1011 [http://www.editlib.org/p/23127].
55. O'Hara, K., Enhancing the quality of open data. Floridi, L., Illari, P., (eds.) The Philosophy of Information Quality, Synthese Library, 358, 2014, Springer International Publishing, 201–215, 10.1007/978-3-319-07121-3_11.
56. Palmirani, M., Martoni, M., Girardi, D., Open government data beyond transparency. Ko, A., Francesconi, E., (eds.) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8650, 2014, Springer International Publishing, 275–291, 10.1007/978-3-319-10178-1_22.
57. Parycek, P., Hochtl, J., Ginner, M., Open government data implementation evaluation. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research 9 (05 2014), 80–99 [http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext pid=S0718-18762014000200007 nrm=iso.].
58. Petychakis, M., Vasileiou, O., Georgis, C., Mouzakitis, S., Psarras, J., A state-of-the-art analysis of the current public data landscape from a functional, semantic and technical perspective. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research 9 (05 2014), 34–47 [http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext pid=S0718-18762014000200004 nrm=is].
59. Pipino, L.L., Lee, Y.W., Wang, R.Y., Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM 45:4 (Apr 2002), 211–218, 10.1145/505248.506010.
60. Prieto, L.M., Rodrguez, A.C., Pimiento, J., Implementation framework for open data in colombia. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2012, ICEGOV ‘12, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 14–17, 10.1145/2463728.2463732.
61. Reiche, K.J., Höfig, E., Implementation of metadata quality metrics and application on public government data. COMPSAC Workshops, 2013, 236–241.
62. Rojas, L., Bermúdez, G., Lovelle, J., Open data and big data: A perspective from colombia. Uden, L., Fuenzaliza Oshee, D., Ting, I.H., Liberona, D., (eds.) Knowledge Management in Organizations, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 185, 2014, Springer International Publishing, 35–41, 10.1007/978-3-319-08618-7_4.
63. Sanabria, P., Pliscoff, C., Gomes, R., E-government practices in south american countries: Echoing a global trend or really improving governance? The experiences of Colombia, Chile, and Brazil. Gascó-Hernández, M., (eds.) Open Government, Public Administration and Information Technology, 4, 2014, Springer, New York, 17–36, 10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_2.
64. Sandoval-Almazan, R., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Luna-Reyes, L.F., Luna, D.E., Rojas-Romero, Y., Open government 2.0: Citizen empowerment through open data, web and mobile apps. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2012, ICEGOV ‘12, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 30–33, 10.1145/2463728.2463735.
65. Sandoval-Almazan, R., Gil-Garcia, J., Towards an evaluation model for open government: A preliminary proposal. Janssen, M., Scholl, H., Wimmer, M., Bannister, F., (eds.) Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8653, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 47–58, 10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_4.
66. Sayogo, D., Pardo, T., Cook, M., A framework for benchmarking open government data efforts. System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on, Jan 2014, 1896–1905.
67. Shadbolt, N., O'Hara, K., Salvadores, M., Alani, H., Egovernment. Domingue, John, Fensel, Dieter, Hendler, James, (eds.) Handbook of Semantic Web Technologies, 2011, Springer-Verlag, 840–900, 10.1007/978-3-540-92913-0_20.
68. Sheffer Correa, A., Correa, P., Silva, D., Soares Correa da Silva, F., Really opened government data: A collaborative transparency at sight. Big Data (BigData Congress), 2014 IEEE International Congress on, June 2014, 806–807.
69. Solar, M., Concha, G., Meijueiro, L., A model to assess open government data in public agencies. Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S., (eds.) EGOV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7443, 2012, Springer, 210–221 [http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egov/egov2012.html#SolarCM12].
70. Solar, M., Meijueiro, L., Daniels, F., A guide to implement open data in public agencies. Wimmer, M., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., (eds.) EGOV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8074, 2013, Springer, 75–86 [http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egov/egov2013.html#SolarMD13].
71. Styrin, E., Dmitrieva, N., Zhulin, A., Openness evaluation framework for public agencies. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2013, ICEGOV ‘13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 370–371, 10.1145/2591888.2591964.
72. Vasa, M., Tamilselvam, S., Building apps with open data in india: An experience. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Inclusive Web Programming - Programming on the Web with Open Data for Societal Applications, 2014, IWP 2014, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–7, 10.1145/2593761.2593763.
73. Veljković, N., Bogdanović-Dinić, S., Stoimenov, L., Web 2.0 as a technological driver of democratic, transparent, and participatory government. Reddick, C.G., Aikins, S.K., (eds.) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance, Public Administration and Information Technology, 1, 2012, Springer, New York, 137–151, 10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_9.
74. Veljković, N., Bogdanović-Dinić, S., Stoimenov, L., Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly 31:2 (2014), 278–290 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X14000434.].
75. Verma, N., Gupta, M.P., Open government data: Beyond policy & portal, a study in indian context. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2013, ICEGOV ‘13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 338–341, 10.1145/2591888.2591949.
76. van der Waal, S., Wecel, K., Ermilov, I., Janev, V., Milošević, U., Wainwright, M., Lifting open data portals to the data web. Auer, S., Bryl, V., Tramp, S., (eds.) Linked Open Data – Creating Knowledge Out of Interlinked Data Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014, Springer International Publishing, 175–195, 10.1007/978-3-319-09846-3_9.
77. Yang, T.M., Lo, J., Wang, H.J., Shiang, J., Open data development and value-added government information: Case studies of taiwan e-government. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2013, ICEGOV ‘13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 238–241, 10.1145/2591888.2591932.
78. Yang, Z., Kankanhalli, A., Innovation in government services: The case of open data. Grand Successes and Failures in IT. Public and Private Sectors – IFIP WG 8.6 International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT, TDIT 2013, Bangalore, India, June 27–29, 2013 Proceedings, 2013, 644–651, 10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_47.
79. Zuiderwijk, A., Gascó, M., Parycek, P., Janssen, M., Special issue on transparency and open data policies: Guest editors’ introduction. Journal Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9:3 (Sep 2014), i–ix http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2661036.2661037.
80. Zuiderwijk, A., Helbig, N., Gil-García, J.R.A., Janssen, M., Special issue on innovation through open data: Guest editors’ introduction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9 (05 2014), i–xiii [http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext pid=S0718-18762014000200001 nrm=iso].
81. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. Wimmer, M., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., (eds.) EGOV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8074, 2013, Springer, 38–49 [http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/egov/egov2013.html#ZuiderwijkJ13].
82. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: A socio-technical view. Gascó-Hernández, M., (eds.) Open Government, Public Administration and Information Technology, vol. 4, 2014, Springer, New York, 115–135, 10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_8.
83. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., The negative effects of open government data — Investigating the dark side of open data. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 2014, dg.o ‘14, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147–152, 10.1145/2612733.2612761.