Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 5-13

  Conradie, Peter ^a   Choenni, Sunil ^b  

^a ROTTERDAM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b Ministry of Security and Justice   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Open data; Participatory action research; Psi

Indexed keywords

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; DATA RELEASE; LESSONS LEARNED; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; OPEN DATUM; PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH; PSI; PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; SURVEYS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84877294380     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2463728.2463731     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Bertino, E. and Sandhu, R. 2005. Database security - concepts, approaches, and challenges. IEEE.
2. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. and Grimes, J.M. 2010. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 3 (Jul. 2010), 264-271.
3. Boulton, G., Rawlins, M., Vallance, P. and Walport, M. 2011. Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data. The Lancet. 377, 9778 (2011), 1633-1635.
4. Braak, S. van den, Choenni, R. and Verwer, S. Combining and Analyzing Judicial Databases. Discrimination and Privacy in the Information Society: Effects of Data Mining and Profiling Large Databases. Springer.
5. Broeders, D., Cijpers, C. and Prins, C., (eds) 2011. De Staat van Informatie. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.
6. Chesler, M. 1991. Participatory action research with self-help groups: An alternative paradigm for inquiry and action. American Journal of Community Psychology. 19, 5 (Oct. 1991), 757-68.
7. Choenni, S., Dijk, J. van and Leeuw, F. 2010. Preserving privacy whilst integrating data: Applied to criminal justice. Information Polity. 15, 1-2 (2010), 125-138.
8. Choenni, S. and Leertouwer, E. 2010. Public safety mashups to support policy makers. Proceedings of the First international conference on Electronic government and the information systems perspective. Springer-Verlag.
9. Creative Commons - CC0 1.0 Universal: 2011. http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/Accessed: 2012-04-10.
10. Dekkers, M., Polman, F., Velde, R. te and Vries, M. de 2006. Mepsir: Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources.
11. European Commission 2003. Communication of the Re-use of Public Sector Information - Review of Directive 2003/98/EC. Regulation.
12. Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N. and Stolterman, E. 2002. Information Systems Development: Methods-in-Action. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
13. Hildebrandt, M. and Koops, B.-J. 2010. The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era. Modern Law Review. 73, 3 (2010), 428-460.
14. Hughes, J. 2003. Commentary: Participatory action research leads to sustainable school and community improvement'. School Psychology Review. 32, 1 (2003), 38-43.
15. Huijboom, N. and Broek, T.V.D. 2011. Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice. 12, April (2011), 1-13.
16. Kalidien, S., Choenni, S. and Meijer, R. 2010. Crime statistics online: potentials and challenges. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (2010), 131-137.
17. McLaren, R. and Waters, R. 2011. Governing Location Information in the UK. Cartographic Journal, The. 48, 3 (2011), 7.
18. Ohm, P. 2009. Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization. Social Science Research Network. 57, 6 (2009), 1-64.
19. Open Data Enschede: 2012. http://opendata.enschede.nl/Accessed: 2012-04-10.
20. Open data | Overheid.nl Open Data: 2012. https://data.overheid.nl/ Accessed: 2012-04-10.
21. Public data for all - opening up Europe's public sector: 2011. http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/neelie-kroes/public-data-for-all-opening-up-europes- public-sector/Accessed: 2012-04-10.
22. Reiman, J. 2012. Driving to the Panopticon: A Philosophical Exploration of the Risks to Privacy Posed by the Highway Technology of the Future Santa Clara Symposium on Privacy and IVHS. Clara Computer & High Technology. 11, 1 (2012).
23. Schikhof, Y., Mulder, I.J. and Choenni, S. 2010. Who will watch (over) me? Humane monitoring in dementia care. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 68, 6 (Jun. 2010), 410-422.
24. Transparency and Open Government | The White House: 2009. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/Transparency-and-Open-Government. Accessed: 2012-04-10.
25. Vries, M. de, Kapff, I., Achiaga, M.N., Wauters, A., Osimo, D., Foley, P., Szkuta, K., O'Connor, J. and Whitehouse, D. 2011. POPSIS: Pricing Of Public Sector Information Study.
26. Warner, J. and Chun, S.A. 2008. A Citizen Privacy Protection Model for E-Government Mashup Services. Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research (2008), 188-196.
27. Weiss, P. 2002. Borders in Cyberspace : Conflicting Public Sector Information Policies and their Economic Impacts. Federal Register. February 2002 (2002).
28. Whyte, W.F. 1989. Advancing scientific knowledge through participatory action research. Sociological Forum. 4, 3 (Sep. 1989), 367-385.
29. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M. and Choenni, S. 2012. Open Data Policies: Impediments and Challenges. 12th European Conf. On E-government, June 14-15 (Barcelona, Spain, 2012), 794-80.
30. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Meijer, R., Choenni, R., Charalabidis, Y. and Jeffery, K. 2012. Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data. Proc. EGOV 2012, 11th European Conf. On Electronic Government, September 3 - 6, LNCS (Kristiansand, Norway, 2012).