Special issue on innovation through open data - A review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda: Guest editors' introduction

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Zuiderwijk, Anneke ^a   Helbig, Natalie ^b   Gil García, J Ramón ^c   Janssen, Marijn ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y DOCENCIA ECONÓMICAS   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901780896     PISSN: None     EISSN: 07181876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-18762014000200001     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. E. Barry and F. Bannister, Barriers to open data release: A view from the top, in Proceedings 2013 EGPA Annual Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2013.
2. C. Bason, Leading Public Sector Innovation. Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol, United Kingdom: The Policy Press, 2010.
3. J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, J. A. Shuler, S. N. Simmons, and J. M. Grimes, Reconciling government documents and e-government: Government information in policy, librarianship, and education, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 433-436, 2009.
4. P. Birkinshaw, Freedom of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge: University Press, 2010.
5. M. Blakemore and M. Craglia, Access to public-sector information in Europe: Policy, rights and obligations, The Information Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13-24, 2006.
6. C. L. Borgman, Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007.
7. S. Borins, Encouraging innovation in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 310-319, 2001.
8. M. T. Borzacchiello and M. Craglia, The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: A research strategy, International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 114-129, 2012.
9. Y. Charalabidis, E. Ntanos and F. Lampathaki, An architectural framework for open governmental data for researchers and citizens, in Electronic government and electronic participation joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2011, Delft, the Netherlands, 2011, pp. 77-85.
10. A. M. Cresswell and D. S. Sayogo, Developing public value metrics for returns to government ICT investments, The Research Foundation of State University of New York (SUNY), New York, 61268, 2012.
11. S. Dawes, Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 377-394, 1996.
12. S. Dawes and N. Helbig, Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency, in Proceedings 9th International Conference on E-government (EGOV), Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010, pp. 50-60.
13. S. Dawes, T. Pardo and A. Cresswell, Designing electronic government information access programs: a holistic approach, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 21, no.1, pp. 3-23, 2004.
14. S. S. Dawes. (2012, June) A realistic look at open data. W3 org. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/pmod2012_submission_38.pdf
15. B. Detlor, M. E. Hupfer, U. Ruhi, and L. Zhao, Information quality and community municipal portal use, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23-32, 2013.
16. K. W. Deutsch, The Nerves of Government. Model of Political Communication and Control. New York: The Free Press, 1966.
17. E. Duval, W. Hodgins, S. Sutton, and S. L. Weibel, Metadata principles and practicalities, D-lib magazine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. unknown, 2002.
18. European Commission. (2012, December) Directive 2003/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. European Commission. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm.
19. European Commission, Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Open data. An engine for innovation, growth and transparent governance, European Commission, Brussels, COM(2011) 882 final, 2011.
20. European Commission. (2013, March) Digital agenda: Commission's open data strategy, questions & answers. [Online]. Available: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/11/891&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
21. European Commission, Digital agenda: Turning government data into gold, European Commission, Brussels, P/11/1524, 2011.
22. E. Ferro. (2013, June) Emerging business models in PSI reuse. Enrico Ferro Blogspot. [Online]. Available: http://enricoferro.blogspot.nl/2012/04/emerging-business-models-in-psi-reuse.html.
23. E. Ferro, and M. Osella. (2012, June) Business models for PSI Re-Use: A multidimensional framework.W3org. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/pmod2012_submission_16.pdf.
24. E. Ferro and M. Osella. (2013, April) Eight business model archetypes for PSI re-use. W3 org [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/papers.
25. M. Foulonneau and T. W. Cole. (2012, December) Strategies for reprocessing aggregated metadata. IMLS DCC. [Online]. Available: http://imlsdcc.grainger.uiuc.edu/docs/metadatareprocessing.pdf.
26. S. Ganapati and C. G. Reddick, Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 115-122, 2012.
27. C. P. Geiger, and J. v. Lucke, Open government and (linked) (open) (government) (data), Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 265-278, 2012.
28. Gemeente Amsterdam. (2013, December) Amsterdam Open Data. [Online]. Available: http://www.amster-damopendata.nl/home
29. Y. Glickman, M. Flügge, and V. Pterneas. Deliverable D7.7.6. Data provision methods and components, http://www.engage-project.eu/wp/?page_id=212.
30. T. M. Harrison, S. Guerrero, G. B. Burke, M. Cook, A. Cresswell, N. Helbig, J. Hrdinova, and T. Pardo, Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective, Information Polity, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 83-97, 2012.
31. T. M. Harrison, T. A. Pardo, and M. Cook, Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda, Future Internet, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 900-928, 2012.
32. J. Hartley, Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present, Public money and management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27-34, 2005.
33. N. Helbig, A. M. Cresswell, G. B. Burke, and L. Luna-Reyes, The dynamics of opening government data. A white paper, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, State University of New York, New York, USA, 2012.
34. M. Hunt and R. A. Chapman, Open government and freedom of information, in Open government in a theoretical and practical context (R. A. Chapman and M. Hunt, Eds.). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2006, pp. 1-10.
35. K. Janssen, The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 446-456, 2011.
36. M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, G. Kuk, and T. Cresswell, Guest Editors' Introduction: E-government Interoperability, Infrastructure and Architecture: State-of-the-art and Challenges, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. I-VIII, 2011.
37. M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government, Information Systems Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 258-268, 2012.
38. M. Janssen and A. Zuiderwijk, Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users, Social Science Computer Review, vol. 32, no, 5, pp. unknown, 2014.
39. K. G. Jeffery, Metadata: The future of information systems, in Information Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Themes (J. Brinkkemper, E. Lindencrona and A. Sølvberg, Eds.). London: Springer Verlag, 2000.
40. T. Jetzek, M. Avital and N. Bjørn-Andersen, The value of open government data: A strategic analysis framework. 2012 Pre-ICIS Workshop, in Proceedings International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, Florida, United States, 2012.
41. A. Joorabchi and A. E. Mahdi, An unsupervised approach to automatic classification of scientific literature utilizing bibliographic metadata, Journal of Information Science, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 499-514, 2011.
42. T. B. Jørgensen and B. Bozeman, Public values: An inventory, Administration & Society, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 354-381, 2007.
43. S. J. Kline and N. Rosenberg, An overview of innovation, in The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, Eds.). United States of America: National Academy of Sciences, 1986, pp. 275-305.
44. S. Kulk and B. v. Loenen, Brave new open data world?, International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 196-206, 2012.
45. V. Kundra, Digital Fuel of the 21st Century: Innovation through Open Data and the Network Effect, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, 2012.
46. La Ville de Paris. (2013, December) Paris data. Open Data. [Online]. Available: http://opendata.paris.fr/page/home/.
47. J. Lindman, M. Rossi and V. K. Tuunainen, Open data services: Research agenda, in Proceedings 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Wailea, Maui, Hawaii, 2013, pp. 1239-1246.
48. U. Maier-Rabler and S. Huber, Open: the changing relations between citizens, public administration and political authority, Journal of eDemocracy & Open Government (JeDEM), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 48-58, 2011.
49. P. McDermott, Building open government, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 401-413, 2010.
50. A. Meijer, Publishing public performance results on the Internet. Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold dutch public service organizations to account?, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 165-185, 2007.
51. A. Meijer, J. de Hoog, M. van Twist, M. van der Steen, and J. Scherpenisse, Understanding the dynamics of open data. From sweeping statements to complex contextual interactions, in Open Government: Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance (M. Gasco, Ed.). New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 101-114.
52. A. Meijer and M. Thaens, Public information strategies: Making government information available to citizens, Information Polity, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 31-45, 2009.
53. T. Meynhardt, Public value inside: What is public value creation?, International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 32, no. 3-4, pp. 192-219, 2009.
54. T. Meynhardt and S. Bartholomes, (De)composing public value: In search of basic dimensions and common ground, International Public Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 284-308, 2011.
55. L. B. Mohr, Determinants of innovation in organizations, The American Political Science Review, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 111-126, 1969.
56. M. H. Moore, Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, USA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
57. National Information Standards Organization, Understanding metadata, Bethesda: National Information Standards Organization Press, 2004.
58. K. Nilsen, Economic theory as it applies to public sector information, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 44, no.1, pp. 419-489, 2010.
59. R. P. Nugroho, A comparison of open data policies in different countries. Lessons learned for an open data policy in Indonesia, Master thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 2013.
60. K. O'Hara, Transparent government, not transparent citizens: A report on privacy and transparency for the cabinet office, Gov. UK, London, 272769, 2011.
61. K. O'Hara, Transparency, open data and trust in government: shaping the infosphere, in ACM Web Science 2012, 2012.
62. B. Obama. (2013, February) Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Transparency and open government. The White House. [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Government
63. B. Obama. (2012, September) Open government directive. The White House. [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf.
64. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Oslo Manual, 2013.
65. S. L. Pallickara, S. Pallickara and M. Zupanski, Towards efficient data search and subsetting of large-scale atmospheric datasets, Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 28, no.1, pp. 112-118, 2012.
66. D. S. Sayogo and T. Pardo, Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. S19-S31, 2013.
67. D. S. Sayogo and T. A. Pardo, Exploring the motive for data publication in open data initiative: Linking intention to action, in Proceedings 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii 2012, pp. 2623-2632.
68. D. S. Sayogo and T. A. Pardo, Understanding smart data disclosure policy success: The case of green button, in Proceedings 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Quebec City, Canada, 2013, pp. 72-81.
69. J. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1934.
70. N. Schuurman, A. Deshpande and D. Allen, Data integration across borders: a case study of the Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer (British Columbia/Washington State), JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 921-934, 2008.
71. C. Tenopir, S. Allard, K. Douglass, A. U. Aydinoglu, L. Wu, E. Read, M. Manoff, and M. Frame, Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions, PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. e21101, 2011.
72. The World Bank. (2013, December) Access to Information. The World Bank. [Online]. Available: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTANDOPERATIONS/EXTINFODISCLOSURE/0,menuPK:64864911~pagePK:4749265~piPK:4749256~theSitePK:5033734,00.html.
73. United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe. (2011, December) Guidelines for statistical metadata on the internet. UNECE. [Online]. Available: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/metadata.pdf.
74. A. F. E. van Veenstra, IT-induced Public Sector Transformation. 's-Hertogenbosch: Uitgeverij BOXPress, 2012.
75. M. Vardaki, H. Papageorgiou and F. Pentaris, A statistical metadata model for clinical trials' data management, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 129-145, 2009.
76. A. Whitmore, Extracting knowledge from U.S. department of defense freedom of information act requests with social media, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29 no. 2, pp. 151-157, 2012.
77. P. Windrum and P. Koch, Innovation in Public Sector Services. Entrepreneurship, creativity and management. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008.
78. World Wide Web Consortium.(2013, July) Standards. W3C. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/standards/.
79. B. Worthy, More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government, Governance, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 561-582, 2010.
80. Z. Yang and A. Kankanhalli, Innovation in government services: The case of open data, in Proceedings IFIP WG 8.6 International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT, TDIT 2013 Banglore, India, 2013, pp. 644-651.
81. J. Zhang, S. Dawes, and J. Sarkis, Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 18 no. 5, pp. 548-567, 2005.
82. A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making, in Proceeding 12th Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), Koblenz, Germany, 2013, pp. 38-49.
83. A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: A socio-technical view, in Open Government, Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance (M. Gascó-Hernández, Ed.). New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 115-136.
84. A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A comparison framework, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17-29, 2014.
85. A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, S. Choenni, and R. Meijer, Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 8, no. 2, 2014.
86. A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, S. Choenni, R. Meijer, and R. Sheikh Alibaks, Socio-technical impediments of open data, Electronic Journal of Government, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 156 -172, 2012.
87. A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen and K. Jeffery, Towards an e-infrastructure to support the provision and use of open data, in Proceedings Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM13), Krems an der Donau, Austria, 2013, pp. 275-291.
88. A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, R. Meijer, S. Choenni, Y. Charalabidis, and K. Jeffery, Issues and guiding principles for opening governmental judicial research data, in Proceedings 11th Conference on Electronic Government, Kristiansand, Norway, 2012, pp. 90-101.
89. A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen and A. Parnia, The complementarity of open data infrastructures: An analysis of functionalities, in Proceedings 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2013), Quebec, Canada, 2013, pp. 166-171.
90. A. Zuiderwijk, K. Jeffery, and M. Janssen, The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers, Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 222-244, 2012.