Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: A socio-technical view

Open Government: Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 115-135

  Zuiderwijk, Anneke ^a   Janssen, Marijn ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901790125     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., & Maurino, A. (2009). Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1-52. doi:10.1145/1541880.1541883.
2. Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked data. Accessed Oct 11 2012, from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
3. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency:E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
4. Blakemore, M., & Craglia, M. (2006). Access to public-sector information in Europe: Policy, rights and obligations. The Information Society, 22(1), 13-24.
5. Böhm, C., Freitag, M., Heise, A., Lehmann, C., Mascher, A., Naumann, F., Schmidt, M., et al. (2012). GovWILD: Integrating open government data for transparency. WWW, (Companion Volume), 321-324.
6. Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17-32.
7. Boulton, G., Rawlins, M., Vallance, P., & Walport, M. (2011). Science as a public enterprise: The case for open data. The Lancet, 377(9778), 1633-1635.
8. Bovens, M. A. P. (2005). Public accountability. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Braunschweig, K., Eberius, J., Thiele, M., & Lehner, W. (2012). The state of open data. Limits of current open data platforms. Paper presented at the International World Wide Web Conference, Lyon, France. http://www2012.wwwconference.org/proceedings/nocompanion/wwwwebsci2012_ braunschweig.pdf.
10. Bunakov, V., & Jeffery, K. (2013). Licence management for public sector information. Paper presented at the Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM13), Krems an der Donau, Krems, Austria.
11. Charalabidis, Y., Ntanos, E., & Lampathaki, F. (2011). An architectural framework for open governmental data for researchers and citizens. In M. Janssen, A. Macintosh, J. Scholl, E. Tambouris, M. Wimmer, H. d. Bruijn, & Y. H. Tan (Eds.), Electronic government and electronic participation joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2011 (pp. 77-85). Delft.
12. Dawes, S. (2010). Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 377-383.
13. Dawes, S., & Helbig, N. (2010). Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on e-government (EGOV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
14. Duval, E., Hodgins, W., Sutton, S., & Weibel, S. L. (2002). Metadata principles and practicalities. D-lib magazine, 8(4).
15. European Commission. (2003). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. Accessed Dec 12 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm.
16. European Commission. (2011). Digital agenda: Turning government data into gold. Brussels:European Commission.
17. Fischer, G., & Herrmann, T. (2011). Socio-technical systems: A meta-design perspective. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development (IJSKD), 3(1), 1-33. doi:10.4018/jskd.2011010101.
18. Foulonneau, M., & Cole, T. W. (2005). Strategies for reprocessing aggregated metadata. Accessed Dec 12 2012, from http://imlsdcc.grainger.uiuc.edu/docs/metadatareprocessing.pdf.
19. Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 897-920. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
20. Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29, 441-455.
21. Geiger, C. P., & Lucke, J. Von (2012). Open Government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data). Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government, 4(2), 265-278.
22. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (Second edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
23. Hüner, K., Otto, B., & Österle, H. (2011). Collaborative management of business metadata. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 366-373.
24. Janssen, M., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Open data and transformational government. Paper presented at the Transforming Government Workshop, Brunel University, United Kingdom.
25. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268.
26. Jeffery, K. G. (2000). Metadata: The future of information systems. In J. Brinkkemper, E. Lindencrona, & A. Sølvberg (Eds.), Information Systems Engineering: State of the art and research themes. London: Springer Verlag.
27. Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2012). The value of open government data: A strategic analysis framework. 2012 Pre-ICIS Workshop. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, Florida, United States. http://openarchive. cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/8621/Jetzek.pdf?sequence=1.
28. Kaasenbrood, M. (2013). An exploration of the use of open government data by private organisations. Contributing to the improvement of governmental policies by examining the current use of open government data by private organisations in The Netherlands. Master thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. Delft.
29. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2011). Open government data: A stage model. Paper presented at the The 10th Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2011), Delft, the Netherlands.
30. Kalidien, S., Choenni, R., & Meijer, R. F. (2010). Crime statistics online: potentials and challenges. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities, Puebla, Mexico.
31. King, R. D., Liakata, M., Lu, C., Oliver, S. G., & Soldatova, L. N. (2011). On the formalization and reuse of scientific research. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 8, 1440-1448.
32. Kulk, S., & Van Loenen, B. (2012). Brave new open data world? International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 7, 196-206.
33. Lapi, E., Tcholtchev, N., Bassbouss, L., Marienfeld, F., & Schieferdecker, I. (2012, 16-20 July 2012). Identification and Utilization of Components for a Linked Open Data Platform. Paper presented at the Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), 2012 IEEE 36th Annual.
34. Lord, P., Macdonald, A., Lyon, L., & Giaretta, D. (2004). From data deluge to data curation. Accessed Dec 14 2012, from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/e.j.lyon/150.pdf.
35. McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401-413.
36. Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2009). Public information strategies: Making government information available to citizens. Information Polity, 14, 31-45.
37. Meijer, R., Choenni, S., Sheikh Alibaks, R., & Conradie, P. (2013). Bridging the Contradictions of Open Data. Paper presented at the 13th European Conference on eGovernment, University of Insubria, Como, Italy.
38. National Information Standards Organization. (2004). Understanding metadata. Bethesda: National Information Standards Organization Press.
39. Nugroho, R. P. (2013). A comparison of open data policies in different countries. Lessons learned for an open data policy in Indonesia. Master thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. Delft.
40. Olsen, W. K. (2004). Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In M. Holborn & M. Haralambos (Eds.), Developments in Sociology. Ormskirk:Causeway Press.
41. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Schuurman, N., Deshpande, A., & Allen, D. (2008). Data integration across borders: A case study of the Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer (British Columbia/Washington State). JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(4), 921-934. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00192.x.
43. Taylor, C. (2003). An introduction to metadata. Accessed Dec 8 2011, from http://www.library. uq.edu.au/papers/ctmeta4.html.
44. United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe. (2000). Guidelines for statistical metadata on the internet. Accessed Dec 8 2011, from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/metadata.pdf.
45. Vardaki, M., Papageorgiou, H., & Pentaris, F. (2009). A statistical metadata model for clinical trials' data management. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 9(5), 129-145.
46. Vogel, L. (2011). The secret's in: Open data is a foreign concept in Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 183(7), E375-E376.
47. Vonk, G., & Ligtenberg, A. (2010). Socio-technical PSS development to improve functionality and usability-Sketch planning using a Maptable. Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(3-4), 166-174. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.001.
48. World Wide Web Consortium. (2006). W3C Architecture Domain. Naming and Addressing: URIs, URLs. Accessed Jan 11 2013, from http://www.w3.org/Addressing/.
49. Xiong, J., Hu, Y., Li, G., Tang, R., & Fan, Z. (2011). Metadata Distribution and Consistency Techniques for Large-Scale Cluster File Systems. IEEE Transaction on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 22(5), 803-816.
50. Yaeli, A., Ship, H., Alexopoulos, C., Pterneas, V., & Gaberlo, N. (2012). Deliverable D7.7.3. Data and knowledge annotation and linking methods. Accessed Jan 3 2014, from http://www.engage- project.eu/wp/?p=1228.
51. Zhang, J., Dawes, S., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 548-567.
52. Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2013b). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison Government Information Quarterly. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. giq.2013.04.003
53. Zuiderwijk, A., Jeffery, K., & Janssen, M. (2012a, May 3-4). The necessity of metadata for open linked data and its contribution to policy analyses. Paper presented at the Conference on E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM12), Krems, Austria.
54. Zuiderwijk, A., Jeffery, K., & Janssen, M. (2012b). The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers. Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government, 4(2), 222-244.
55. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Sheikh Alibaks, R. (2012c). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of eGovernment, 10(2), 156-172.
56. Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2013a). A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. Paper presented at the 12th conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), Koblenz, Germany.
57. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Jeffery, K. (2013b). Towards an e-infrastructure to support the provision and use of open data. Paper presented at the Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM13), Krems an der Donau, Austria.