Government 2.0. A conceptual framework and a case study using Mexican data for assessing the evolution towards open governments

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 124-136

  González, Juan Carlos ^a   Garcia, Jaime ^b   Cortés, Federico ^c   Carpy, David ^c  

^a Secretaría de la Función Pública   (Mexico)

^b Social Progress Imperative   (United States)

^c CIDE AC Carretera México Toluca ^*  (Mexico)

Author keywords

Accountability; Budget; E government; Information access; Open data; Open government; Transparency; Visualization

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; ECONOMICS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; INVESTMENTS; TRANSPARENCY;

ACCOUNTABILITY; BUDGET; E-GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION ACCESS; OPEN DATUM; OPEN GOVERNMENT;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84905569705     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2612733.2612742     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (68)

1. Margetts, H and Partington, M. 2010. "Developments in E-government, " in M. Adler (ed.). Administrative Justice in Context, Hart, Oxford/Portland, pp. 47-71.
2. Bovens, M. and Zouridis, S. 2002. "From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control, " Public Administration Review, 62(2): 174-84.
3. UN. 2002. Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective, Washington DC: UN.
4. Silcock, R. 2001. "What is e-Government?, " Parliamentary Affairs, 54(1): 88-101.
5. Siau, K. and Long, Y. (2006). Using social development lenses to understand e-government development. Journal of Global Information Management 14 (1), 47-62.
6. Frick, M. 2008. "Translucent States: Political Mediation of E-Transparency, " International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(3): 81-102.
7. Cited in Henman, P.2013. Government and the internet: evolving technologies, enduring research themes. In William H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 283-306) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
8. Lynn, L. 2012. "The many faces of governance: Adaptation? Transformation? Both? Neither? in Levi Faur, D (Ed), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 49-64 ) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Henman, P. art. cit.
10. Sugai, P. et al 2010. The Six Immutable Laws of Mobile Business. Wiley.
11. European Commission. 2007. Breaking Barriers to eGovernment-A Legal and Institutional Analysis of Barriers to eGovernment, Brussels: eGovernment Unit, EC. DOI= http://www.egovbarriers.org/?view=project-outputs>. [Accessed: February 5, 2014].
12. Jenkins, H. 2009. If it doesn't spread it's dead. DOI= http://henryjenkins.org/2009/02/if-it-doesnt-spread-its-dead-p.html [Accessed: February 8, 2014].
13. Eisenhardt, K (1989). "Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, pp. 57-74.
14. Referred by Siau, K. and Long, Y. 2005. "Synthesizing e-Government Stage Models-a Meta-Synthesis Based on Meta-Ethnography Approach, " Industrial Management + Data Systems, 105(3-4): 443-58.
15. Dutton, William H., 2013, 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
16. TechAmerica Foundation. 2013. Demystifying Big Data: A Practical Guide to Transforming the Business of Government, TechAmerica Foundation, Washington, D.C. DOI= http://www.techamerica.org/Docs/techAmerica-BigDataReport-FINAL.pdf [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
17. European Council. 2013. European Council 24/25 October 2013 Conclusions, EUCO 169/13, Brussels. DOI= http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms-data/docs/ pressdata/en/ec/139197.pdf [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
18. BIG-Big Data Public Private Forum. N.D. Objectives, BIG-Big Data Public Private Forum. DOI= http://www.big-project.eu/content/objectives [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
19. Margiolas, Aristotle, 2014. How 'small' is Europe in Big Data?, The European Sting. DOI=http://europeansting.com/2014/02/10/how-small-is-europe-in- big-data/[Accessed: 23 April 2014].
20. European Data Protector Supervisor, 2014. Privacy and competitiveness in the age of big data: The interplay between data protection, competition law and costumer protection in the Digital Economy, European Data Protector Supervisor, Brussels. DOI=https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/ Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2014/14-03-26-competitition-law-big-data-EN.pdf [Accessed: 23 April 2014].
21. Australian Government. 2013. Big Data Strategy - Issues Paper, Department of Finance and Deregulation, Canberra. DOI= http://www.finance.gov.au/files/ 2013/03/Big-Data-Strategy-Issues-Paper1.pdf [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
22. Australian Government, Department of Finance, 2014. Seeking proposals for joint private-public projects using big data, Australian Government, Canberra. DOI=http://www.finance.gov.au/blog/2014/13/03/2014-seeking-proposals-for-joint- private-public-projects-using-big-data/[Accessed: 24 April 2014].
23. John Podesta, 2014. Big Data and the Future of Privacy, The White House Blog, Washington, D.C. DOI=http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/01/23/big-data- and-future-privacy [Accessed: 24 April 2014].
24. Margetts, Helen, 2013. The Internet and Democracy, Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, Oxford. DOI=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0020. [Accessed: 18April 2014].
25. City Council, N.D. Democracy, what does that mean? Young people's views, Bristol City Council, Local e-Democracy National Project, Bristol. DOI= http://askbristol.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/cx-e-democracy-young-people.pdf [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
26. Bristol City Council. N.D. Online Petitions, Bristol City Council, Bristol. DOI= http://epetitions.bristol.gov.uk/epetition-core/community/ petitions [Accessed: 8 February 2014].
27. Goldstein, E. et al. 2013. Government Sponsored E-Petitions: A Guide for Development and Implementation, AmericaSpeaks, Washinton, D.C. DOI= http://americaspeaks.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/EPetitionPaperFinal.pdf [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
28. Queensland Parliament. N.D. Current e-petitions, Queensland Parliament, Brisbane. DOI= https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/work-of-assembly/petitions/e- petitions [Accessed: 8 February 2014].
29. Kelly, R. 2013, e-Petitions, SN/PC/06450, Parliament and Constitution Centre, London. DOI= http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN06450.pdf [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
30. HM Government, N.D. All e-petitions, HM Government, London. DOI= http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions [Accessed: 8 February 2014].
31. Howard, Emma, 2014. E-petitions can be very effective, but don't put them in the hands of government, The Guardian, London. DOI=http://www.theguardian. com/commentisfree/2014/feb/24/e-petitions-often-worse-than-useless [Accessed:24 April 2014].
32. Howard, Emma, 2014. E-petitions can be very effective, but don't put them in the hands of government, The Guardian, London. DOI=http://www.theguardian. com/commentisfree/2014/feb/24/e-petitions-often-worse-than-useless [Accessed:24 April 2014].
33. Hawkins, Ross, 2011. What is the point of e-petitions? BBC, London. DOI= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14409032. [Accessed: 24 April 2014].
34. Phillips, Macon, 2011. We the People: Announcing White House Petitions & How They Work in The White House Blog. DOI= http://www.whitehouse.gov/ blog/2011/09/01/we-people-announcing-white-house-petitions-how-they-work [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
35. Phillips, Macon, 2013. Sunshine Week: In Celebration of Civic Engagement in The White House Blog. DOI= http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/03/13/ sunshine-week-celebration-civic-engagement [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
36. Vogt, PJ, 2013. White House e-petitions work more often than you'd think. On The Media. DOI=http://www.onthemedia.org/story/white-house-e-petitions- actually-work-sometimes/[accessed: 24 April 2014].
37. Open Government Data Working Group, N.D. Open Government Data Homepage, Open Knowledge Foundation, Cambride. DOI= http://opengovernmentdata.org/ [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
38. Government of Canada, N.D. Canada's Action Plan on Open Government, Government of Canada, Ottawa. DOI= http://data.gc.ca/eng/canadas-action-plan- open-government [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
39. Arthur, C. and Cross, M. Give us back our crown jewels. The Guardian, 9 March 2006. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/mar/09/education.epublic. [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
40. Cabinet Office, 2010. The government has relaxed current licensing provisions on public sector information, making it faster and easier to re-use it, Press Release, Cabinet Office, London. DOI= https://www.gov.uk/government/ news/government-removes-barrier-to-public-data-use [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
41. Data.gov, N.D. About, U.S. General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. DOI= http://www.data.gov/about [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
42. Involution Studios, 2014. Involution's Arlington Visual Budget Wins MMA Innovation Award, Press Release, Involution Studios, Arlington. DOI= http://www.goinvo.com/tag/information-visualization/[Accessed: 6 February 2014].
43. Involution Studios, 2013. Arlington Releases Online Budget Visualization Tool Designed by Involution, Press Release, Involution Studios, Arlington. DOI= http://www.goinvo.com/arlington-releases-online-budget-visualization-tool/ [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
44. Evich, M. 2014, Arlington: 'Visual Budget' illuminates how taxes are spent, Massachusetts Municipal Association, Boston. DOI= http://www.mma.org/ index.php?option=com-content&view=article&id=12853:arlington-visual- budget-illuminates-how-taxes-are-spent&catid=33:municipal- government&Itemid=572 [Accessed:16 February 2014].
45. Fogel, K. 2013. Checkbook NYC advances civic open source, Opensource.com. DOI= http://opensource.com/government/13/6/open-source-checkbook [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
46. Read, M. 2012. Practical Steps to Improve Management Information in Government, Cabinet Office, London. DOI= https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment-data/file/206869/Read-Review-2013-06-12.pdf [Accessed:16 February 2014].
47. [Ley Federal de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública Gubernamental, DOF 11-06-2002, Mexico City. DOI= http://legislacion.scjn.gob.mx/LF/Reformas.aspx?IdLey=24956.
48. Artículo 6, Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, última reforma DOF 7-02-2014, Mexico City, DOI= https://www.scjn.gob.mx/normativa/analisis-reformas/Paginas/titulo-primero.aspx.
49. Alianza Gobierno Abierto, N.D., Misión y objetivos, Open Government Partnership. DOI= http://www.opengovpartnership.org/es/acerca-de/ misi%C3%B3n-y-objetivos [Accessed: 23 April 2014].
50. Alianza Gobierno Abierto, N.D., Plan de Acción 2013-2015 México, Open Government Partnership. DOI= http://www.opengovpartnership. org/sites/default/files/pa-aga-2015%20%281%29.pdf [Accessed: 23 April 2014].
51. Deca Equipo Pueblo A.C., 2013, Documento Sistematizado de la Mesa de Diálogo por la Transparencia en el Distrito Federal, México City DOI= http://www.equipopueblo.org.mx/descargas/reciente/ Sistematizacion%20de%20la%20Experiencia%20Mesa%20de%20Dialogo%20por%20la%20Tran sparencia%20en%20el%20Distrito%20Federal.pdf [Accessed: 23 April 2014].
52. Guerra Ford Oscar Mauricio, 2013. La experiencia del gobierno abierto en el Distrito Federal in Hoffman Andrés (Ed) La promesa del Gobierno Abierto, Instituto de Acceso a la Información Pública y Protección de Datos Personales del Distrito Federal (pp. 443-460), Mexico City DOI= http://www.lapromesadelgobiernoabierto.info/[Accessed: 23 April 2014].
53. Programa de Gobierno Abierto CDMX, N.D., Manifiesto de Gobierno Abierto CDMX, DOI= http://www.gobabiertocdmx.org/[Accessed: 23 April 2014].
54. Secretaría de la Función Pública, 2012. Hackatón por la transparencia, Secretaría de la Función Pública. DOI= http://datosabiertos.gob.mx/objetivo.html [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
55. 4to Premio a la innovación en transparencia, N.D., Objetivo, Premio a la innovación en transparencia, DOI= http://premiotransparencia. org.mx/Paginas/inicio.aspx [Accessed: 23 April 2014].
56. Cambray, P. Desarrollan apps para el DF. El Universal, 7 June 2013. http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/articulos/78273.html [Accessed: 6 February 2014].
57. Laboratorio para la Ciudad, Hackdf Festival de Datos de la Ciudad de México, DOI= http://labplc.mx/hackdf-2/[Accessed: 23 April 2014].
58. Artículo 74-Fracción 4, Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, última reforma DOF 7-02-2014, Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión, Mexico City, p.64-66. DOI= http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/1.pdf [Accessed:16 February 2014].
59. Artículo 42, Ley Federal de Presupuesto y Responsabilidad Hacendaria, última reforma DOF 24-01-2014, Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión, Mexico City, p.31- 33. DOI=http://www. diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LFPRH.pdf [Accessed: 16 February 2014].
60. Online version of budget proposals and the approved budgets for different years available in: http://www.shcp.gob.mx/EGRESOS/PEF/Paginas/ DocumentosRecientes.aspx [Accessed:16 February 2014].
61. A summary review of the main proceedings to register a federal project is available at: http://www.hacienda.gob.mx/EGRESOS/ppi/Sistemas-inversion/ principales-procesos-ui.pdf [Accessed:16 February 2014].
62. The Federal Investment Portfolio of Public Projects and Programs can be visited in the following website: http://www.shcp.gob.mx/EGRESOS/ppi/Paginas/ SIP.aspx [Accessed:16, February 2014].
63. Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Principales logros in Observatorio de Transparencia Presupuestaria, Mexico City DOI= http://www.transparenciapresupuestaria.gob.mx/ptp/contenidos/?id=18 [Accessed: 23 April 2014].
64. World Economic Forum, 2013. Global Information Technology Report 2013, World Economic Forum. DOI= http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-information- technology-report-2013 [Accessed:16 February 2014].
65. Open Knowledge Foundation, 2013. Open Data Index, Open Knowledge Foundation, Cambridge. DOI= https://index.okfn.org/country [Accessed:16 February 2014].
66. United Nations Public Administration Network, 2012. The United Nations E-Government Survey, New York. DOI= http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/ documents/un/unpan048065.pdf [Accessed:16 February 2014].
67. World Bank, 2013. e-Government Practice Group of the Information & Communication Technologies Sector Unit Website, World Bank, Washington, D.C. DOI= http://go.worldbank.org/6WT3UPVG80 [Accessed:16 February 2014].
68. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005. Summary: OECD e-Government Studies: Mexico, OECD, Paris. DOI= 10.1787/9789264010727-en [Accessed:16 February 2014] Intel, Moore's Law Inspires Intel Innovation, Intel, Santa Clara. DOI= http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/ moores-law-technology.html [Accessed:16 February 2014].