Local big data: The role of libraries in building community data infrastructures

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 17-23

  Bertot, John Carlo ^a   Butler, Brian S ^a   Travis, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Big data; Community engagement; Data curation; Data infrastructure

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; HOUSING; LIBRARIES;

CASE STUDY APPROACH; COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT; DATA CURATION; DATA INFRASTRUCTURE; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; FISCAL CONSTRAINTS; HEALTH AND WELLNESS; INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS;

BIG DATA;

EID: 84905587069     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2612733.2612762     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bertot, J.C., & Choi, H. (2013). Big data and egovernment: Issues, policies, and recommendations. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1-10.
2. Bertot, J. C., Gorham, U., Jaeger, P. T. & Sarin, L.C. (forthcoming). Big Data, Libraries, and the Information Policies of the Obama Administration. The Bowker Annual.
3. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Gorham, U., Taylor, N. G., & Lincoln, R. (2013). Delivering e-government services and transforming communities through innovative partnerships: Public libraries, government agencies, and community organizations. Information Polity, 18, 127-138.
4. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78-91.
5. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency?: Egovernment and social media as openness and anticorruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
6. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Munson, S., & Glaisyer, T. (2010). Engaging the public in open government: The policy and government application of social media technology for government transparency. IEEE Computer, 43(11), 53-59.
7. Bollier, D. (2010). The Promise and Peril of Big Data. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Available at http://ilmresource.com.
8. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679.
9. Cullier, D., & Piotrowski, S. J. (2009). Internet information-seeking and its relation to support for access to government records. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 441-449.
10. Frederikson, L. (2012). Big Data. Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 345-349.
11. Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 371-376.
12. Jaeger, P. T., Bertot, J. C., & Shilton, K. (2012). Information policy and social media: Framing governmentcitizen Web 2.0 interactions. In C. G. Reddick & S. K. Aikins (Eds.), Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications (pp. 11-25). London: Springer.
13. Jaeger, P. T., Paquette, S., & Simmons, S. N. (2010). Information policy in national political campaigns: A comparison of the 2008 campaigns for President of the United States and Prime Minister of Canada. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(1), 1-16.
14. Little, G. (2012). Managing the data deluge. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38, 263-264.
15. MeriTalk. (2013). The State and Local Big Data Gap. Alexandria, VA: MeriTalk. Available at: http://www.meritalk.com/state-and-local-big-data.php.
16. Obama, B.H. (2013, May 9). Executive Order 13642: Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information. Washington, DC: Office of the Executive. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-05-14/pdf/ 2013-11533.pdf.
17. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2011). The Open Government Partnership: National action plan for the United States of America. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available at: http://www. whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/us-national-action-plan-final-2.pdf.
18. Paquette, S., Jaeger, P. T., & Wilson, S. C. (2010). Identifying the risks associated with governmental use of cloud computing. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 245-253.
19. Shuler, J.A., Jaeger, P.T., & Bertot, J.C. (2014). Egovernment without government. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1): 1-3.
20. The Economist. (2012, October 27). Special report on technology and geography: A sense of place. The Economist, 405(8808): 1-22.
21. The Seattle Foundation. (2006). A Healthy Community: What You Need to Know to give Strategically. Seattle, WA: The Seattle Foundation. Available at: http://www.seattlefoundation.org/aboutus/Documents/10029170-HCReport-web.pdf.
22. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). City and Town Totals: Vintage 2011. Available at: http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2011/index.html.
23. U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. (2013). Public Libraries in the United States Survey: Fiscal Year 2010. Washington, DC, U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. Available at: http://www.imls.gov/assets/1/ AssetManager/PLS2010.pdf.
24. th Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.