Anti-corruption online monitoring systems in Brazil

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 419-425

  Matheus, Ricardo ^a   Ribeiro, Manuella M ^b   Vaz, José Carlos ^a   De Souza, Cesar A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Anti corruption; Brazil; Electronic governance; Electronic government; Latin america

Indexed keywords

ANTI-CORRUPTION; BRAZIL; ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE; ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT; LATIN AMERICA;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MONITORING; PARTIAL DISCHARGES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

CRIME;

EID: 84877266671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2463728.2463809     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics). Census 2010. Brasilia: IBGE, 2010.
2. IMF (International Monetary Fund). World Economic Outlook (WEO) 2011 - Slowing Growth, Rising Risks. Washington: IMF, 2011.
3. AMB (Association of Brazilian Magistrates). Confidence Barometer in the Brazilian Institutions. Brasilia: AMB, 2008.
4. Chadwick, A. & May, C. Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: "e-Government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. In: Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, Vol. 16, No 2, April 2003 (pp271-300). 2003.
5. Kissler, L & Heidemann, F.G.. Public Governance: New regulatory model for relations between state, market and society? In: Rev Adm Públ. 2006, 40 (3): 479-99.
6. Matheus, R., Crantschaninov, T. I. & Nerling, M. A.. Interlegis Program in Brazil; Use of Web 2.0, Collaborative Tools and Free Software. In: V International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - V ICEGOV, 2011, Tallinn. V ICEGOV, 2011.
7. Vaz, J.C. Prospects and challenges for the expansion of electronic government in the Brazilian municipalities. In: International Seminar on Electronic Government and Local Government. Brasília, 2003.
8. Davies, P. B. Models for e-government. Accessed at: www.emeraldinsight. com/1750-6166.htm. 2007.
9. Grant, G. & Chau, D. Developing a generic framework for e-government. In: Journal of Global Information Management, v. 13, n. 1, Jan./Mar. 2005.
10. Basu, S. E-Government and Developing Countries: An Overview. In: International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 18, 1, 109-132. 2004.
11. Ndou, V. E-government for developing countries: opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries (EJISDC). 18, 1, 1-24. 2008.
12. World Bank. Definition of E-Government. Introduction to e-Government: Overview of key concepts. http://go.worldbank.org/BHJDK9CYB0> 2010.
13. Unpan. United Nations e-Government Survey 2008: From e-Government to Connected Governance. United Nations Publications. . 2008.
14. Lau, T. Y.; Aboulhoson, M. & Lin, C. Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommunications Policy. Volume 32, Issue 2, March 2008, Pages 88-100. doi:10.1016/j.telpol. 2007.07.007. 2008.
15. Garcia, T., et al. Democracy in the Age of Electronic Government. In: International Symposium on Intellectual Property, Information and Ethics. 2003.
16. Diniz, E. H. E-Government in Brazil: a historical perspective from a structured model analysis. Journal of Public Administration, Rio de Janeiro, v. 43, No 1, Feb. 2009.
17. Marcondes, C. H. & Jardim, J. M. Government Information Policies: building eGovernment in the Federal Administration of Brazil. DataGramaZero - Journal of Information Science. v. 4, n. 2. April 2003. Accessed: www.dgzero.org/out00/Art-02.html. 2003.
18. Diniz, E. H. (2000). Use of electronic commerce in government. Report 18/2000 NPP. EAESP/FGV, in May 2000.
19. Coelho, S. M. eGovernment and its impacts on the structure and workforce of public organizations. In: Public Service Journal, Year 52, No. 2, abrjun 2001, p. 111-136. 2001.
20. Ferrer, F. & Santos, P. (Orgs.). E-government: electronic government in Brazil. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2004.
21. Reinhard, N. & Dias, I. Categorization of E-Gov Initiatives: a comparison of three perspectives. In: X International Congress of CLAD on State Reform and Public Administration, Santiago, Chile, 18 to 21 October 2005.
22. Fugini, M.G., Maggiolini, P., Pagamaci, B. Why is it difficult to make a true "electronic government". Production Journal, v. 15, no 3, p. 303-309, Sept./Dec. 2005.
23. SILVA, S. P. da.. Levels of democratic participation in the use of Internet by governments. Public Opinion [online]. 2005, vol.11, n.2, pp. 450-468. ISSN 0104-6276.
24. Rothberg, Danilo. For a research agenda on electronic democracy. Public Opinion [online]., v. 14, n. 1, pp. 149-172. ISSN 0104-6276. 2008.
25. Matheus, R.; Ribeiro, M. M. . Models for Citizen engagement in Latin American Case studies of Public Digital Budgeting. In: III International Conference on Electronic Governance, 2009.
26. Frey, Klaus. Electronic Governance: Experiences of European cities and some lessons for developing countries. I Electronic Conference of the Virtual Centre for Policy Studies (CEVEP). 2000.
27. Frick, María M.. Electronic Participation Towards Open Government in Latin America. E-democracy Centre - Université de Genève - Faculte de Droit, 40, bd Du Pont-D'Arve CH-1211 Genève 4 - Switzerland. 2005.
28. WELP, Y.. (2010). ICT's for Democracy in Latin America?. In: TAMBOURIS, E.; MACINTOSH, A.; GLASSEY, O. (ORGs): ePart 2010, LNCS 6229, pp. 42-53, 2010.
29. PEEL, D.. Using digital technologies to broaden public participation in planning. In: Cunha, M. A.; FREY, K. & DUARTE, F.. (Ed.). Local governance and information technology and communication. Champagnat, 2009.
30. Teixeira, A. Internet transparency in municipal governance: the experience of the state of Ceara. Fortaleza: Konrad Adenauer Foundation, 2004.
31. Teixeira, A. Guide to the transparency of citizenship: to prevent corruption. Ceará: Konrad Adenauer Foundation, 2006.
32. Junior, Hélio Santiago Ramos & Rover, Aires José. Electronic Democracy in the Information Society. 2007.
33. Nunes, Edson. The political grammar of Brazil: patronage and bureaucratic insulation. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2003.
34. Miguel, L. F.. Acountability impasses: dilemmas and alternatives of political representation. Sociology and Politics Journal, v. 25, p. 25-38, 2005.
35. Camerer, M.. Measuring Public Integrity. Journal of Democracy (Volume 17, Number 1, January 2006, pp. 152-165). 2006.
36. Kaufmann, D.. Transparency, Incentives and Prevention (TIP) for Corruption Control and Good Governance. Conference on Economic Reform and Good Governance: Fighting Corruption in Transition Economies, Beijing, April 11-12th, 2002.
37. Peixoto, T.. e-Participatory Budgeting: e-Democracy from theory to success?. E-democracy Center - e-Working Papers 2008.
38. Peixoto, T.. Beyond Theory: e-Participatory Budgeting and its Promises for eParticipation. European Journal of ePractice - www.epracticejournal.eu 1 No 7 - March 2009 - ISSN: 1988-625X.
39. Campos, Anna Maria. Accountability: When can we translate it to Portuguese. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v. 24, n. 2, p. 30-50, fev./abr. 1990.
40. Akutsu, L.. Government Portals in Brazil: accountability and delegative democracy. In: X International Congress of CLAD on State Reform and Public Administration, Santiago, Chile, 18 to 21 October 2005.
41. Speck, B. W.. Paths of Transparency. University of Campinas Press. 2004.
42. Pinho, José antonio Gomes de. Investigating e-government portals of states in Brazil: a lot of technology, poor democracy. Public Administration Journal - Rio de Janeiro 42(3):471-93, May/June. 2008.
43. Vale, Paulo H. M. Electronic government in the dimensions and capacity-management, e-participation and e-transparent: identifying aspects of electronic governance in 64 municipalities in the metropolitan area of Belo Horizonte. PhD Thesis. Belo Horizonte: Fundação João Pinheiro. 2006.
44. MATHEUS, R.; RIBEIRO, M. M.. Anti-corruption online tools in Latin America. In: III International Conference on Electronic Governance, 2009.
45. MATO GROSSO, State Court of Accounts Portals of Transparency: http://geoobras.tce.mt.gov.br/cidadao/. Accessed at: 12 May, 2011.
46. PARAIBA, State Court of Accounts Portals of Transparency: http://sagres.tce.pb.gov.br/estado-empenhos01.php. Accessed at: 18 May, 2011.
47. PARANA, State Court of Accounts Portals of Transparency: www.controlesocial.pr.gov.br/ObrasPublicasConsultar.asp. Acessed at: 24 May, 2011.
48. PIAUÍ, State Court of Accounts Portals of Transparency: srvapp.tce.pi.gov.br/obrasweb/. Accessed at: 08 June, 2011.