Walk the Talk? How Symbolic and Substantive CSR Actions Affect Firm Performance Depending on Stakeholder Proximity

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 358-372

  Schons, Laura ^a   Steinmeier, Maria ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

corporate citizenship; Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); employee support; green washing, decoupling; neo institutional theory; stakeholder proximity; stakeholder theory; symbolic and substantive CSR actions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939839238     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: 15353966     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1381     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 32: 836–863.
2. Aguinis H, Glavas A. 2012. What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38: 932–968.
3. Aldrich H, Herker D. 1977. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review 2: 217–230.
4. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach. Psychological Bulletin 27: 5–24.
5. Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science 1: 177–194.
6. Ashforth BE, Harrison SH, Corley KG. 2008. Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management 34: 325–374.
7. Babiak K, Trendafilova S. 2011. CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18: 11–24.
8. Barnett ML. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32: 794–816.
9. Brown TJ, Dacin PA. 1997. The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing 61: 68–84.
10. Calfee JE, Ringold DJ. 1994. The 70% majority: Enduring consumer beliefs about advertising. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 228–238:.
11. Cheng B, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. 2014. Corporate social responsiblity and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal 35: 1–23.
12. Chiu S, Sharfman M. 2011. Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: an investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management 37: 1558–1585.
13. Clarkson MBE. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.
14. Creyer EH, Ross WT. 1996. The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters 7: 173–185.
15. Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 1–13.
16. Delmas MA, Burbano VC. 2011. The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review 54: 64–87.
17. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.
18. Ditlev-Simonsen CD, Midttun A. 2011. What motivates managers to pursue corporate responsibility? A survey among key stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18: 25–38.
19. Driscoll C, Starik M. 2004. The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics 49: 55–73.
20. Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S. 2007. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: the role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing 24: 224–241.
21. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology 71: 500–507.
22. Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50.
23. Freeman EH. 1999. Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24: 233–236.
24. Handelman JM, Arnold SJ. 1999. The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing 63: 33–48.
25. Klein J, Dawar N. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21: 203–217.
26. Korschun D, Bhattacharya CB, Swain SD. 2014. Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees. Journal of Marketing 78: 20–37.
27. Luo X, Bhattacharya CB. 2006. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing 70: 1–18.
28. Luo X, Wang H, Raithel S, Zheng Q. 2014. Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management Journal, Early View Published Online.
29. McGuire JB, Sundgren A, Schneeweis T. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31: 854–872.
30. McWilliams A, Siegel D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21: 603–609.
31. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.
32. Morsing M, Schultz M. 2006. Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review 15: 323–338.
33. Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.
34. Obermiller C, Spangenberg ER. 1998. Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7: 159–186.
35. Obermiller C, Spangenberg ER. 2000. On the origin and distinctness of skepticism toward advertising. Marketing Letters 11: 311–322.
36. Oliver C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16: 145–179.
37. Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24: 403–441.
38. Peloza J. 2009. The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management 35: 1518–1541.
39. Perez-Batres LA, Doh JP, Miller VV, Pisani MJ. 2012. Stakeholder pressures as determinants of csr strategic choice: why do firms choose symbolic versus substantive self-regulatory codes of conduct? Journal of Business Ethics 110: 157–172.
40. Pfeffer J. 1981. Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Research in Organizational Behavior, Cummings LL, Staw B (eds.). JAI: Greenwich, CT.
41. Rao H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal 15: 29–44.
42. Russo MV, Fouts PA. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40: 534–559.
43. Rust R, Lemon KN, Zeithaml VA. 2004. Return on marketing: using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing 68: 109–127.
44. Sen S, Bhattacharya CB. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38: 225–243.
45. Skarmeas D, Leonidou CN. 2013. When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research 66: 1831–1838.
46. Smidts A, Pruyn ATH, Van Riel CBM. 2001. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal 49: 1051–1062.
47. Sun L, Aryee S, Law KS. 2007. High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. The Academy of Management Journal 50: 558–577.
48. Surroca J, Tribó JA, Zahra SA. 2013. Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal 56: 549–572.
49. Turban DB, Greening DW. 1996. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40: 658–672.
50. Turker D. 2009a. How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 89: 189–204.
51. Turker D. 2009b. Measuring corporate social responsibility: a scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics 85: 411–427.
52. Verdeyen V, Put J, Van Buggenhout B. 2004. A social stakeholder model. International Journal of Social Welfare 13: 325–331.
53. Vries G, Terwel BW, Ellemers N, Daamen DD. 2013. Sustainability or profitability? How communicated motives for environmental policy affect public perceptions of corporate greenwashing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (first published online).
54. Walker K, Wan F. 2012. The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics 109: 227–239.
55. Wagner T, Lutz RJ, Weitz BA. 2009. Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing 73: 77–91.
56. Wang H, He J, Mahoney JT. 2009. Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the role of economic- and relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal 30: 1265–1285.
57. Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL. 1999. Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practice. Academy of Management Journal 42: 564–576.
58. Westphal JD, Zajac EJ. 1998. The symbolic management of stockholders: corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 127–153.
59. Wood DJ. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16: 691–718.
60. Zhu Q, Yin H, Liu J, Lai KH. 2014. How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in chinese enterprises? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 21: 28–40.
61. Zott C, Huy QN. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly 52: 70–105.