The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 227-242

  Walker, Kent ^a   Wan, Fang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Corporate environmental performance; Corporate websites; Green highlighting; Green washing; Substantive actions; Symbolic actions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865438804     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. (1998). An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35(5), 641-654.
2. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645-670.
3. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45-62.
4. Arevalo, J. A. (2010). Critical reflective organizations: An empirical observation of global active citizenship and green politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(2), 299-316.
5. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218.
6. Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. C. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35(3), 269.
7. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103.
8. Bansal, P., & Gao, J. (2006). Building the future by looking at the past: Examining published research in organizations and environment. Organization and Environment, 19(4), 458-478.
9. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794-816.
10. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103-126.
11. Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgements or organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151-179.
12. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1325-1343.
13. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. The Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435-455.
14. Brenner, L., Rottenstreich, Y., Sood, S., & Bilgin, B. (2007). On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 369-376.
15. Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 37-59.
16. Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11-29.
17. Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 331-339.
18. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 863-878.
19. Clelland, I. J., Douglas, T. J., & Henderson, D. A. (2006). Testing resource-based and industry factors in a multi-level model of competitive advantage creation. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 5(1), 1-24.
20. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67.
21. Dean, T. J., & Brown, R. L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 288-303.
22. Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 147-166.
23. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
24. Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Are conglomerates less environmentally responsible? An empirical examination of diversification strategy and subsidiary pollution in the U. S. chemical industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 1-14.
25. Dou, W., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2007). Using brand websites to build brands online: A product versus service brand comparison. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(2), 193-206.
26. Douglas, T. J., & Judge, W. Q. Jr. 1995. Integrating the natural environment into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 00014273, 475-479.
27. Esrock, S. I., Leichty, G. B. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate Web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305-319.
28. Faucheux, S., Nicolai, I., & O'Connor, M. (1998). Globalization, competitiveness, governance and environment: What prospects for a sustainable development? In S. Faucheux, J. Gowdy, & I. Nicola (Eds.), Sustainability and firms, technological change and the changing regulatory environment. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
29. Feldman, S. J., Soyka, P. A., & Ameer, P. (1997). Does improving a firm's environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? Journal of Investing, 6(4), 87-97.
30. Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity re-examined: A baseline analysis of early business Web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(Fall), 457-474.
31. Habisch, A., Patelli, L., Pedrini, M., & Schwartz, C. (2011). Different talks with different folks: A comparative survey of stakeholder dialog in Germany, Italy, and the U. S. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 381-404.
32. Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 98-113.
33. Hargadon, A., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 476-501.
34. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
35. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30-37.
36. Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2011). Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand? Harvard Business Review, 79(2), 128-134.
37. Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: HarperBusiness.
38. Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 825-842.
39. Kahneman, D., & Taversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
40. Kahneman, D., & Taversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
41. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's responsible care program. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 698-716.
42. Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 599-615.
43. Konar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance? Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281-289.
44. Korten, D. C. (1995). When corporations rule the world. San Francisco: Kumarian Press Inc./Berrett-Koehler.
45. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate green-washing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253-261.
46. Lee, S. Y., & Rhee, S.-K. (2007). The change in corporate environmental strategies: A longitudinal empirical study. Management Decision, 45(2), 196-216.
47. Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Claver-Cortes, E., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2008). Complementary resources and capabilities for an ethical and environmental management: A qual/quan study. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 701-732.
48. Lovgren, S. (2006). Al Gore's "Inconvenient truth" movie: Fact or hype? National Geographic News. http://news. nationalgeographic. com/news/2006/05/060524-global-warming_2. html.
49. Macias, W., & Lewis, L. S. (2004). A content analysis of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug web sites. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 43-56.
50. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
51. McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80-98.
52. Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 299-311.
53. Miller, K. D., & Leiblein, M. J. (1996). Corporate risk-return relations: Returns variability versus downside risk. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 91-122.
54. Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U. K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 299-315.
55. Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119-128.
56. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
57. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
58. Pacala, S., & Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305(5686), 968-972.
59. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
60. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
61. Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of green-washing? Business and Society, 44(4), 377-414.
62. Rao, H. (2002). Tests tell: Institutional activists, constitutive legitimacy and consumer acceptance in the American automobile industry, 1895-1912. In P. Ingram & B. Silverman (Eds.), Advances in strategic management, Vol. 19: The new institutionalism in strategic management. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
63. Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006). The liability of a good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U. S. automotive industry. Organization Science, 17(1), 101-117.
64. Rooney, C. (1993). Economics of pollution prevention: How waste reduction pays. Pollution Prevention Review, 3(Summer), 261-276.
65. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
66. Russo, M. V., & Harrison, N. S. (2005). Organizational design and environmental performance clues from the electronics industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 582-593.
67. Salzmann, O., Ionescu-somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-35.
68. Schuler, D. A. (1996). Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 720-737.
69. Stevens, J. M., Steensma, H. K., Harrison, D. A., & Cochran, P. L. (2005). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives' decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 181-195.
70. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
71. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35-67.
72. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672.
73. Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement and theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357-387.
74. Wassmuth, B., & Thompson, D. R. (1999). Banner ads in online newspapers: Are they specific? Paper presented at the American Academy of Advertising annual conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
75. Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539-552.
76. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Substance and symbolism in CEOs' long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 367-390.
77. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1998). The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1): 127-153.
78. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Administrative Science Quarterly Douglas and Judge is from the best paper proceedings, 00014273.
79. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1995). Accounting for the explanations of CEO compensation: Substance and symbolism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 283-308.