Transportation network vulnerability analysis for the case of a catastrophic earthquake

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Volumn 12, Issue , 2015, Pages 234-254

  Khademi, Navid ^a   Balaei, Behrooz ^b   Shahri, Matin ^c   Mirzaei, Mojgan ^d   Sarrafi, Behrang ^e   Zahabiun, Moeid ^c   Mohaymany, Afshin S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^e INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SEISMOLOGY IIEES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Devastating earthquake; Disaster emergency and relief operations; Hazards; Natural disasters; Network disruption; Network vulnerability analysis; Transportation network redundancy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939575360     PISSN: 22124209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.009     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. D'Este G.M., Taylor M.A.P. Network vulnerability: an approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport networks,. The Network Reliability of Transport 2003, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK.
2. Jenelius E. Redundancy importance: links as rerouting alternatives during road network disruptions. Proc. Eng. 2010, 3:129-137.
3. Jenelius E., Mattsson L.G. Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: a grid-based approach with case study. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46(5):746-760.
4. Nagae T., Fujihara T., Asakura Y. Anti-seismic reinforcement strategy for an urban road network. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46(5):813-827.
5. Snelder M., Van Zuylen H.J., Immers L.H. A framework for robustness analysis of road networks for short term variations in supply. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46(5):828-842.
6. Hopkins D.C., Lumsden J.L., Norton J.A. Wellington's lifelines in earthquake project: An outline of a major review. Proceedings of the 3rd US Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering 1991, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Los Angeles.
7. Nicholson A., Dalziell E. Risk evaluation and management: A road network reliability study. The Network Reliability of Transport 2003, 45-60. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK. M.G.H. Bell, Y. Iida (Eds.).
8. Berdica K. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transp. Policy 2002, 9(2):117-127.
9. Jenelius E., Petersen T., Mattsson L.G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2006, 40(7):537-560.
10. Taylor M.A.P. Network vulnerability in large-scale transport networks. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46(5):743-745.
11. Murray A.T., Matisziw T.C., Grubesic T.H. A methodological overview of network vulnerability analysis. Growth Ch. 2008, 39(4):573-592.
12. Chen A., et al. Assessing network vulnerability of degradable transportation systems: An accessibility based approach. Transportation and Traffic Theory 2007 2007, Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, The Netherlands. R.E. Allsop, M.G.H. Bell, B.G. Heydecker (Eds.).
13. Chen A., et al. Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2007, 7(3):241-256.
14. Chen B.Y., et al. Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46(3):501-516.
15. Chang S.E., Nojima N. Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2001, 35(6):475-494.
16. Bono F., Gutiérrez E. A network-based analysis of the impact of structural damage on urban accessibility following a disaster: the case of the seismically damaged Port Au Prince and Carrefour urban road networks. J. Transp. Geogr. 2011, 19(6):1443-1455.
17. Mirhashemi S., et al. The 2003 Bam earthquake: Overview of first aid and transport of victims. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2007, 22(6):513.
18. Tierney K., et al. Social and public policy issues following the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthq. Spectra 2005, 21(S1):513-534.
19. JICA The comprehensive master plan study on urban seismic disatser prevention and management for the greater tehran area 2004, Tehran Disaster Mitigation and Management Center, Tehran, Iran.
20. Scott D.M., et al. Network robustness index: a new method for identifying critical links and evaluating the performance of transportation networks. J. Transp. Geogr. 2006, 14(3):215-227.
21. Taylor M.A. Critical transport infrastructure in urban areas: impacts of traffic incidents assessed using accessibility-based network vulnerability analysis. Growth Ch. 2008, 39(4):593-616.
22. Kurauchi F., et al. Network evaluation based on connectivity vulnerability. Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee 2009, 637-649. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, USA. W.H.K. Lam, S.C. Wong, H.K. Lo (Eds.).
23. Taylor M.A.P., Sekhar S.V.C., D'Este G.M. Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2006, 6(3-4):267-291.
24. Taylor M.A.P., D'Este G.M. Transport network vulnerability: a method for diagnosis of critical locations in transport infrastructure systems. Critical infrastructure: Reliability and vulnerability 2007, Springer, Heildelberg, Germany. A.T. Murray, T.H. Grubesic (Eds.).
25. Jenelius E. Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability. J. Transp. Geogr. 2009, 17(3):234-244.
26. Sullivan J.L., et al. Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: a link-based capacity-reduction approach. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2010, 44(5):323-336.
27. Sohn J. Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: An accessibility approach. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2006, 40(6):491-506.
28. Knoop V.L., et al. Link-level vulnerability indicators for real-world networks. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46(5):843-854.
29. Taylor M.A.P., Susilawati S. Remoteness and accessibility in the vulnerability analysis of regional road networks. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2012, 46(5):761-771.
30. Luathep P., et al. Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis: a sensitivity analysis based approach. Transportation 2011, 38(5):799-817.
31. Dehghani M., Flintsch G., McNeil S. Impact of road conditions and disruption uncertainties on network vulnerability. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2014, 20(3):04014015.
32. Alexander D.E. Principles of Emergency Planning and Management 2002, Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Ambraseys N.N., Melville C.P. A history of Persian Earthquakes 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
34. Abbassi M., Farbod Y. Faulting and folding in quaternary deposits of Tehran's piedmont (Iran). J. Asian Earth Sci. 2009, 34(4):522-531.
35. Karimi S. Seismic scenarios of Tehran. Department of Disaster Prevention and Risk Reduction 2011, Tehran Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization, Tehran, Iran, (In Persian).
36. JICA The study on seismic microzoning of the greater Tehran area in the Islamic Republic of Iran 2000, Centre for Earthquake and Environmental Studies of Tehran (CEST), Tehran, Iran, (In Persian).
37. Ambraseys, N.N., A.A. Moinfar, and J.S. Tchalenko, Ghir Earthquake of 10 April (Serial no. 2789/RMO. RD/SCE), 1972, Paris Unesco (1992).
38. Berberian M. Earthquake faulting and bedding thrust associated with the Tabas-e-Golshan (Iran) earthquake of September 16, 1978. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1979, 69(6):1861-1887.
39. Berberian M., et al. Mechanism of the main shock and the aftershock study of the Tabas-e-Golshan (Iran) earthquake of September 16, 1978: a preliminary report. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1979, 69(6):1851-1859.
40. Adeli H. The Sirch (Kerman, Iran) earthquake of 28 July 1981, a field investigation 1982, Seismological Society of America, USA.
41. Tsukuda T., et al. A field study on various phenomena associated with the 1990 rudbar, northwest Iran, earthquake of M 7.3 1990, Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, (in Japanese).
42. Coburn A., Spence R., Pomonis A. Factors determining human casualty levels in earthquakes: Mortality prediction in building collapse. The tenth world conference on earthquake engineering 1992, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
43. Coburn A., Spence R. Earthquake Protection 2002, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Wes Sussex, England.
44. Khademi N., Sheikholeslami A. Multicriteria group decision-making technique for a low-class road maintenance program. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2010, 16(3):188-198.
45. Rawlinson J.G. Creative Thinking and Brainstorming 1981, Gower Publishing Company, Farnham, UK.
46. Khademi N., Mohaymany A., Shahi J. Intelligent transportation system user service selection and prioritization. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2010, 2189(1):45-55.
47. Horton J.N. Nominal group technique. Anaesthesia 1980, 35(8):811-814.
48. Sample J.A. Nominal group technique: An alternative to brainstorming. J. Ext. 1984, 22(2):1-2.
49. Clark J., Holton D.A. A First Look at Graph Theory 1995, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd, Singapore.
50. Niemeier D.A. Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation 1997, 24(4):377-396.
51. Nishizeki T., Vygen J., Zhou X. The edge-disjoint paths problem is NP-complete for series-parallel graphs. Discret. Appl. Math. 2001, 115(1-3):177-186.
52. Menger K. Zur allgemeinen kurventheorie. Fundam. Math. 1927, 10:96-115.
53. Brandes U., Wagner D. A linear time algorithm for the arc disjoint menger problem in planar directed graphs. Algorithmica 2000, 28(1):16-36.