A network-based analysis of the impact of structural damage on urban accessibility following a disaster: The case of the seismically damaged Port Au Prince and Carrefour urban road networks

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1443-1455

  Bono, Flavio ^a   Gutiérrez, Eugenio ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Damage; Earthquake; Graph theory; Road network; Spatial analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GIS; GRAPHICAL METHOD; HAITI EARTHQUAKE 2010; NETWORK ANALYSIS; PORT OPERATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN TRANSPORT;

HAITI; PORT AU PRINCE;

EID: 80052762479     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albert R., Barabási A.L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 2002, 74(1):47-97.
2. Albert R., Albert I., Nakarado G.L. Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. Physical Review E 2004, 69(2):025103.
3. ARUP, AA.VV, 2010. Haiti Earthquake Response - ARUP Assignment Report, Oxfam GB, 240 p.
4. Barabasi A., Jeong H., Neda Z., Ravasz E., Schubert A., Vicsek T. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2002, 311(3-4):590-614.
5. Bono F., Gutiérrez E., Poljansek K. Road traffic: a case study of flow and path-dependency in weighted directed networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2010, 389(22):5287-5297.
6. Carvalho R., Buzna L., Bono F., Gutiérrez E., Just W., Arrowsmith D. Robustness of trans-European gas networks. Physical Review E (Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics) 2009, 80(1):016106.
7. Chang S.E. Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake. Journal of Transport Geography 2000, 8(1):53-65.
8. Crucitti P., Latora V., Porta S. Centrality measures in spatial networks of urban streets. Physical Review E 2006, 73:036125.
9. Curtin K. Network analysis in geographic information science: review, assessment, and projections. Cartography and Geographic Information Sci ence 2007, 34(2):103-111.
10. De la Torre, L.E., Dolinskaya, I.S., Smilowitz, K.R., in press. Disaster relief routing: integrating research and practice. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences (accepted manuscript 15.06.11).
11. Eberhard, M.O., Baldridge, S., Marshall, J., Mooney, W., Rix, G.J., 2010. The MW 7.0 Haiti earthquake of January 12, 2010. USGS/EERI Advance Reconnaissance Team Report: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1048, 58 p.
12. ESRI, 2004. Arc GIS 9x. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, USA.
13. Fierro, E., Perry, C., 2010. Preliminary Reconnaissance Report, 12 January 2010 Haiti Earthquake. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Report, 12 p.
14. Geurs K.T., van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 2004, 12(2):127-140.
15. Gutiérrez E., Taucer F., De Groeve T., Al-Khudhairy D.H., Zaldivar J.M. Analysis of worldwide earthquake mortality using multivariate demographic and seismic data. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005, 161(12):1151-1158.
16. Gutierrez J., Condeco-Melhorado A., Martin J.C. Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(1):141-152.
17. Jenelius, E., Mattsson, L.G., accepted for publication. Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study. Transportation Research Part A (accepted manuscript 2011).
18. Jenelius E., Petersen T., Mattsson L.G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2006, 40(7):537-560.
19. Jeong H., Tombor B., Albert R., Oltvai Z.N., Barabási A.L. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407(6804):651-654.
20. Juliao, R.P., 1999. Accessibility and GIS. In: ERSA Conference Papers, European Regional Science Association.
21. Kamruzzaman Md., Hine J., Gunay B., Blair N. Using GIS to visualise and evaluate student travel behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19(1):13-32.
22. Makri M., Folkesson C. Accessibility measures for analyses of land-use and travelling with geographical information systems. Proceedings of 2nd KFB-Research Conference 1999, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund.
23. McGrail M.R., Humphreys J.S. Measuring spatial accessibility to primary care in rural areas: improving the effectiveness of the two-step floating catchment area method. Applied Geography 2009, 29(4):533-541.
24. PoljanŠek, K., Bono, F., Gutiérrez, E., 2010. Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: the case of European gas and electricity networks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Published Online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). doi:. doi:10.1002/eqe.1118.
25. Porta S., Crucitti P., Latora V. The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2006, 33(5):705-725.
26. Porta S., Crucitti P., Latora V. The network analysis of urban streets: a dual approach. Physica A 2006, 369:853-866.
27. Schintler L.A., Kulkarni R., Gorman S., Stough R. Using raster-based GIS and graph theory to analyze complex networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 2007, 7:301-313.
28. Sohn J. Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: an accessibility approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2006, 40(6):491-506.
29. Steenberghen T., Aerts K., Thomas I. Spatial clustering of events on a network. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(3):411-418. (Tourism and Climate Change).
30. Vandenbulcke G., Steenberghen T., Thomas I. Mapping accessibility in Belgium: a tool for land-use and transport planning?. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 7(1):39-53.