Accessibility: An evaluation using consumer welfare

Transportation

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 377-396

  Niemeier, Debbie A ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Journey to work; Transit

Indexed keywords

MODE DESTINATION ACCESSIBILITY;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

DESTINATION ACCESSIBILITY; JOURNEY TO WORK; MODAL CHOICE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR;

EID: 0031277863     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004914803019     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Basmaciyan H & Schmidt J (1964) Development and Application of a Modal Split Model for the Puget Sound Region, PSRTS Staff Report, No. 12, Seattle, Washington, 5-28.
2. Ben-Akiva M & Lerman S (1979) Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In: Hensher D & Stopher P (eds) Behavioral Travel Modeling (pp 654-679). London: Croom Helm.
3. Ben-Akiva M & Lerman S (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Series.
4. Black J & Conroy M (1977) Accessibility measures and the social evaluation of urban structure. Environment and Planning A (9): 1012-1031.
5. Burns L (1979) Transportation, Temporal and Spatial Components of Accessibility. Lexington, Ma: Heath and Company.
6. Cohen D & Basner D (1972) Accessibility - Its Use as an Evaluation Criteria in Testing and Evaluating Alternative Transportation Systems. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, FHWA.
7. Freeman A (1993) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
8. Goulias K & Ma J (1995) Analysis of Longitudinal Data from the Puget Sound Transportation Panel. FHWA, BAT-94-016, Washington, DC.
9. Handy S (1992) Regional versus Local Accessibility: Variations in Suburban Form and the Effects on Non-work Travel. PhD dissertation, Berkeley, California: University of California.
10. Hanson S & Schwab M (1987) Accessibility and intraurban travel. Environment and Planning A (19): 735-748.
11. Hanson S & Johnston I (1987) Gender differences in work trip lengths. Urban Geography 6: 735-748.
12. Erikson J (1988) An analysis of the journey to work for women. Social Problems 24.
13. Gordon P, Kumar A & Richardson H (1988) Beyond the journey to work. Transportation Research A (22A): 419-426.
14. Kitamura R & Kermanshah M (1983) Identifying time and history dependencies of activity choices. Transportation Research Record 944: 22-30.
15. Kitamura R & Kermanshah M (1984) Sequential model of the interdependent activity and destination choices. Transportation Research Record 987: 81-89.
16. Kitamura R (1994) Time of day characteristics of travel. 1990 NPTS Report Series: Special Reports on Trip and Vehicle Attributes. U.S. Department of Transportation.
17. Mannering F & Winston C (1987) Economic effects of voluntary export restrictions. In: Blind Intersection: Policy and the Automobile Industry. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute.
18. Mannering F & Hamed M (1990) Commuter welfare approach to high occupancy vehicle lane evaluation: an exploratory analysis. Transportation Research A, 24A(5): 371-379.
19. Mannering F (1994) Assessing the impacts of audio home copying restrictions. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 33(1): 31-45.
20. Mannering F, Abu-Eisheh S & Arnadottir A (1990) Dynamic traffic equilibrium with discrete/continuous econometric models. Transportation Science 24(2): 105-116.
21. McFadden D (19??) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: Manski & McFadden (eds) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Murakami E & Watterson T (1991) Developing a household travel panel survey for the Puget Sound Region. Preprint, 73rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
23. Ortuzar J & Willumson L (1994) Modelling Transport. New York, NY: Wiley.
24. Pendyala RM, Goulias KG, Kitamura R & Murakami E (1993) Development of weights for a choice-based panel survey sample with attribution. Transportation Research Part A, 27(6): 477-492.
25. Rosenbloom S (1988) The mobility needs of the elderly. In: Malfetti (ed) Transportation in an Aging Society (pp 21-71). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
26. Rosenbloom S (1994) Travel by women. In: Pisarski (ed) NPTS: Demographic Special Reports (pp 75-164). FHWA, USDOT.
27. Small K & Rosen H (1981) Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 49: 105-130.
28. Train K (1990) Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and Application to Automobile Demand. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
29. Vickerman R (1974) Accessibility, attraction, potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility. Environment and Planning A 6.
30. Wachs M & Kumagal T (1973) Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 7.
31. Wickstrom G (1971) Defining Balanced Transportation - a question of opportunity. Traffic Quarterly 25.
32. Williams H (1976) Travel demand models, duality relationships and user benefit analysis. Journal of Regional Science 16: 147-166.
33. Winston C & Mannering F (1984) Consumer demand for automobile safety. American Economic Review 74(2): 13-21.
34. Zerbe R & Dively D (1994) Benefit-Cost Analysis: In Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Harper Collins.