Link-level vulnerability indicators for real-world networks

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 843-854

  Knoop, Victor L ^a   Snelder, Maaike ^a,b   van Zuylen, Henk J ^a   Hoogendoorn, Serge P ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Delay; Incidents; Indicators; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

INDICATORS (INSTRUMENTS); PUBLIC POLICY; TRANSPORTATION;

DELAY; INCIDENTS; LINEAR FITS; LINK-BASED; REAL-WORLD NETWORKS; TRAFFIC SIMULATORS; VULNERABILITY; VULNERABILITY INDICATORS;

VEHICLE ACTUATED SIGNALS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 84859162940     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bell M.G.H. A game theory approach to measure the performance reliability of transport networks. Transportation Research Part B 2000, 34(6):533-545.
2. Bliemer, M.J.C., 2005. INDY 2.0 Model Specifications. Tech. Rep., Delft University of Technology.
3. Bliemer M.J.C. Dynamic queuing and spillback in an analytical multiclass dynamic network loading model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2029 2007.
4. Bogers E.A.I., Viti F., Hoogendoorn S.P. Joint modeling of advanced travel information service, habit, and learning impacts on route choice by laboratory simulator experiments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1926 2005, 189-197.
5. Chakravarti I.M., Laha R.G., Roy J. Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics: Techniques of Computation, Descriptive Methods, and Statistical Inference 1967, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
6. Corthout, R., Tampère, C.M.J., Immers, L.H., 2009. Marginal incident computation: an efficient algorithm to determine congestion spillback due to incidents. In: Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
7. Jenelius, E., 2007. Incorporating dynamics and information in a consequence model for road network vulnerability analysis. In: Van Zuylen, H.J. (Ed.), Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Transport Network Reliability, The Hague, the Netherlands.
8. Knoop V.L., Hoogendoorn S.P., Van Zuylen H.J. Approach to critical link analysis of robustness for dynamical road networks. Traffic & Granular Flow 2007, 393-402. Springer Verlag, Berlin. A. Schadschneider, T. Pöschel, R. Kühne, M. Schreckenberg, D. Wolf (Eds.).
9. Knoop V.L., Hoogendoorn S.P., Van Zuylen H.J. The influence of spillback modelling when assessing consequences of blockings in a road network. European Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure Research 2008, 8(4):287-300.
10. Knoop V.L., Hoogendoorn S.P., Van Zuylen H.J. Rerouting behaviour of travellers under exceptional traffic conditions - an empirical analysis of route choice. Procedia of Engineering 2010, 3:113-128.
11. Kurauchi, F., Sumalee, A., Tamura, H., Uno, N., 2007. Bilevel programming problem for analysing capacity vulnerability in a transportation network under limited damage. In: Proceedings of third International Symposium on Transport Network Reliability, The Hague, the Netherlands.
12. Li, M., 2008. Combining DTA Approaches for Studying Road Network Robustness. TRAIL Research School, Delft University of Technology.
13. Lighthill M.J., Whitham G.B. On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1955, 229(1178):317-345.
14. Murray-Tuite, P.M., Mahmassani, H.S., 2004. A methodology for the determination of vulnerable links in a transportation network. In: Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
15. Richards P.I. Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research 1956, 4(4):42-51.
16. Spearman C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology 1904, 15(1):72-101.
17. Tamminga, G.F., Maton, J.C., Poorteman, R., Zee, J., 2005. De Robuustheidscanner - Robuustheid van netwerken: een modelmatige verkenning. Tech. Rep. I& M-99366053-GT/mk, Grontmij Nederland, i.o.v. Adviesdienst Verkeer & Vervoer.
18. Tampère, M.J., Stada, J., Immers, L.H., 2007. Methodology for Identifying vulnerable section in a national road network. In: Proceedings of 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
19. Zuurbier, F.S., Van Zuylen, H.J., Hoogendoorn, S.P., Chen, Y., 2006. A generic approach to generating optimal controlled prescriptive route guidance in realistic traffic networks. In: Proceedings of the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, vol. CD-ROM, Washington.