Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis: A sensitivity analysis based approach

Transportation

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 799-817

  Luathep, Paramet ^a   Sumalee, Agachai ^a   Ho, H W ^a   Kurauchi, Fumitaka ^b  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Large scale road network; Sensitivity analysis; Vulnerability analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EFFICIENCY; METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; ROADS AND STREETS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ACCESSIBILITY; ANALYSIS-BASED APPROACHES; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; LARGE-SCALE APPLICATIONS; ROAD NETWORK; SOCIO-ECONOMIC EFFECTS; TRADITIONAL APPROACHES; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS;

NETWORK SECURITY;

ACCESSIBILITY; METROPOLITAN AREA; ROAD TRANSPORT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT; VULNERABILITY;

BANGKOK; CENTRAL REGION [THAILAND]; KRUNG THEP MAHANAKHON; SIOUX FALLS; SOUTH DAKOTA; THAILAND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80053561100     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-011-9350-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Asakura, Y., Kashiwadani, M.: Road network reliability caused by daily fluctuation of traffic flow. Eur. Transp. Highw. Plan. 19, 73-84 (1991).
2. Bell, M. G. H., Iida, Y.: Transportation Network Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (1997).
3. Berdica, K.: An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transp. Policy 9(2), 117-127 (2002).
4. Berdica, K., Mattsson, L.: Vulnerability: a model-based case study of the road network in Stockholm. In: Murray, A. T., Grubesic, T. H. (eds.) Critical infrastructure: reliability and vulnerability, pp. 81-106. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
5. Chen, A., Yang, H., Lo, H. K., Tang, W. H.: Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results. Transp. Res. B 36(3), 225-252 (2002).
6. Clark, S. D., Watling, D. P.: Sensitivity analysis of the probit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment model. Transp. Res. B 36(7), 617-635 (2002).
7. Connors, R. D., Sumalee, A., Watling, D. P.: Sensitivity analysis of the variable demand probit stochastic user equilibrium with multiple user-classes. Transp. Res. B 41(6), 593-615 (2007).
8. D'Este, G. M., Taylor, M. A. P.: Network vulnerability: an approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport networks. In: Bell, M. G. H., Iida, Y. (eds.) The Network Reliability of Transport, pp. 23-44. Pergamon, Oxford (2003).
9. Daganzo, C. F., Sheffi, Y.: On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transp. Sci. 11(3), 253-274 (1977).
10. DOPA: Department of provincial administration, population statistics (in Thai). http://www. dopa. go. th/stat/y_stat51. html (2009).
11. Hansen, W. G.: How accessibility shapes land use. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 25(2), 73-76 (1959).
12. Jenelius, E.: Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability. J. Transp. Geogr. 17(3), 234-244 (2009).
13. MathWorks (2011) Matlab R2011a.
14. Pearson, K.: Notes on the history of correlation. Biometrika 13(1), 25-45 (1920).
15. Robinson, S. M.: Strong regularity and the sensitivity analysis of traffic equilibria: a comment. Transp. Sci. 40(4), 540-542 (2006). doi: 10. 1287/trsc. 1060. 0162.
16. Sheffi, Y.: Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1985).
17. Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15(1), 72-101 (1904).
18. Sumalee, A., Luathep, P., Lam, W. H. K., Connors, R. D.: Evaluation and design of transport network capacity under demand uncertainty. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2090, 17-28 (2009).
19. Suwansirikul, C., Friesz, T. L., Tobin, R. L.: Equilibrium decomposed optimization: a heuristic for the continuous equilibrium network design problems. Transp. Sci. 21(4), 254-263 (1987).
20. Taylor, M. A. P.: Critical transport infrastructure in urban areas: Impacts of traffic incidents assessed using accessibility-based network vulnerability analysis. Growth Change 39(4), 593-616 (2008).
21. Taylor, M. A. P., D'Este, G. M.: Transport network vulnerability: a method for diagnosis of critical locations in transport infrastructure systems. In: Murray, A. T., Grubesic, T. H. (eds.) Critical Infrastructure: Reliability and Vulnerability, pp. 9-30. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
22. Taylor, M. A. P., Sekhar, S. V. C., D'Este, G. M.: Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks. Netw. Spatial Econ. 6(3), 267-291 (2006).
23. van Vliet, D., Wright, I.: Saturn 10. 6 user manual. The Institute for Transport Studies. The University of Leeds and Atkins Planning Consultants Ltd., Leeds (2006).
24. Wakabayashi, H., Iida, Y.: Upper and lower bounds of terminal reliability of road networks: an efficient method with boolean algebra. J. Nat. Disaster Sci. 14(1), 29-44 (1992).
25. Yang, H.: Sensitivity analysis for the elastic-demand network equilibrium problem with applications. Transp. Res. B 31(1), 55-70 (1997).
26. Yang, H., Sasaki, T., Iida, Y., Asakura, Y.: Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks. Transp. Res. B 26(6), 417-434 (1992).
27. Ying, J. Q., Miyagi, T.: Sensitivity analysis for stochastic user equilibrium network flows-a dual approach. Transp. Sci. 35(2), 124-133 (2001). doi: 10. 1287/trsc. 35. 2. 124. 10137.