Network-based acessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks

Networks and Spatial Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 241-256

  Chen, Anthony ^a   Yang, Chao ^b   Kongsomsaksakul, Sirisak ^a   Lee, Ming ^c  

^a Utah State University   (United States)

^b The National Maglev Transportation Engineering Research and Development Center   (China)

^c University of Alaska Fairbanks   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Combined travel demand model; Randomutility; Vulnerability analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES; GENERALIZED TRAVEL COST; RANDOMUTILITY; TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

NETWORK SECURITY;

EID: 34249986152     PISSN: 1566113X     EISSN: 15729427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-006-9012-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BBC News (2005) Tube passenger numbers drop 30%. UK edn, Thursday, 4 August, 2005
2. Bell MGH (1995) Alternative to Dial's logit assignment algorithm. Transp Res 29B(4):287-295
3. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1979) Disaggregate travel and mobility-choice models and measures of accessibility. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on behavioural travel modelling. Croom-Helm, London, pp 654-679
4. Berdica K (2002) An introduction to road vulnerability: What has been done, is done and should be done. Transp Policy 9:117-127
5. Bhat C, Handy S, Kockelman K, Mahmassani H, Chen Q, Weston L (2000) Urban accessibility index: Literature review. Technical report TX-01/ 7-4938-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas, Austin
6. D'Este GM, Taylor MAP (2001) Modelling network vulnerability at the level of the national strategic transport network. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 4(2):1-14
7. D'Este GM, Taylor MAP (2003) Network vulnerability: An approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport network. In: Bell MGH, Iida Y (eds) The network reliability of transport. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 23-44
8. Evans C (1976) Derivation and analysis of some models for combining trip distribution and assignment. Transp Res 9(12):241-246
9. Fisk C (1980) Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment. Transp Res, Part B: Methodol 14(3):243-255
10. Lleras-Echeverri G, Sanchez-Silva M (2001) Vulnerability analysis of highway networks, methodology and case study. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers. Transport 147(4):223-230
11. Miller HJ (1999) Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geogr Anal 31:187-212
12. Miller HJ (2003) Transportation and communication lifeline disruption. In: Cutter SL, Richardson DB, Wilbanks T (eds) The geographic dimensions of terrorism. Routledge, Evanston, IL, pp 145-152
13. Nicholson A, Dalziell E (2003) Risk evaluation and management: A road network reliability study. In: Bell MGH, Iida Y (eds) The network reliability of transport. Proc. of the 1st Int. Sym. on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR). Pergamon, New York, pp 45-59
14. Oppenheim N (1995). Urban travel demand modeling. Wiley, New York
15. Patriksson M (1994) The traffic assignment problem: Models and methods. VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands
16. Platt RH (1995) Lifelines: An emergency management priority for the United States in the 1990s. Disasters 15:172-176
17. Spiess H, Florian M (1989) Optimal strategies: A new assignment model for transit networks. Transp Res, Part B: Methodol 23(2):83-102