Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 746-760

  Jenelius, Erik ^a   Mattsson, Lars Göran ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Area; Disruption; Road network; Robustness; Transport; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; NETWORK SECURITY; ROADS AND STREETS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

AREA; DISRUPTION; ROAD NETWORK; TRANSPORT; VULNERABILITY;

TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS;

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; VULNERABILITY; WILDFIRE;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84859156445     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bates J., Polak J., Jones P., Cook A. The valuation of reliability for personal travel. Transportation Research Part E 2001, 37:191-229.
2. Bell M.G.H., Kanturska U., Schmöcker J.-D., Fonzone A. Attacker-defender models and road network vulnerability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 2008, 366:1893-1906.
3. Berdica K. An introduction to road vulnerability: what has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy 2002, 9:117-127.
4. Berdica K., Mattsson L.-G. Vulnerability: a model-based case study of the road network in Stockholm. Critical Infrastructure: Reliability and Vulnerability, Advances in Spatial Science 2007, 81-106. Springer. A.T. Murray, T.H. Grubesic (Eds.).
5. Beser M., Algers S. SAMPERS - the new Swedish national travel demand forecasting tool. National Transport Models: Recent Developments and Prospects, Advances in Spatial Science 2001, 101-118. Springer. L. Lundqvist, L.-G. Mattsson (Eds.).
6. Buriol, L.S., Resende, M.G.C., Thorup, M., 2004. Speeding up dynamic shortest path algorithms. Technical Report TD-5RJ8B, AT&T Labs. September 2003, Revised August 2004.
7. Cairns S., Atkins S., Goodwin P. Disappearing traffic? The story so far. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Municipal Engineer 2002, 151:13-22.
8. Chen A., Yang C., Kongsomsaksakul S., Lee M. Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 2007, 7:241-256.
9. Cherkassky, B.V., Goldberg, A.V., Radzik, T., 1993. Shortest paths algorithms: theory and experimental evaluation. Technical Report 93-1480, Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
10. Cho S., Gordon P., Moore J.E., Richardson H.W., Shinozuka M., Chang S. Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake. Journal of Regional Science 2001, 41:39-65.
11. Clark S., Watling D. Modelling network travel time reliability under stochastic demand. Transportation Research Part B 2005, 39:119-140.
12. Erath A., Birdsall J., Axhausen K.W., Hajdin R. Vulnerability assessment methodology for Swiss road network. Transportation Research Record 2010, 2137:118-126.
13. Ham H., Kim T.J., Boyce D. Assessment of economic impacts from unexpected events with an interregional commodity flow and multimodal transportation network model. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39:849-860.
14. Jenelius, E., 2007. Incorporating dynamics and information in a consequence model for road network vulnerability analysis. Third International Symposium on Transport Network Reliability (INSTR), The Hague, The Netherlands, July 19-20 2007.
15. Jenelius E. Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:234-244.
16. Jenelius E. User inequity implications of road network vulnerability. Journal of Transport and Land Use 2010, 2(3-4):57-73.
17. Jenelius, E., 2010b. Redundancy importance. Links as rerouting alternatives during road network disruptions. In: Procedia Engineering 3: 1st Conference on Evacuation Modeling and Management, pp. 129-137.
18. Jenelius E., Petersen T., Mattsson L.-G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:537-560.
19. Kim T.J., Ham H., Boyce D.E. Economic impacts of transportation network changes: implementation of a combined transportation network and input-output model. Papers in Regional Science 2002, 81:223-246.
20. Kurauchi, F., Uno, N., Sumalee, A., Seto, Y., 2009. Network evaluation based on connectivity vulnerability. In Lam, H.K., Wong, S.C., Lo, H.K. (Eds.), Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee. Springer, pp. 637-649.
21. Matisziw T.C., Murray A.T. Modeling s-t path availability to support disaster vulnerability assessment of network infrastructure. Computers & Operations Research 2009, 36:16-26.
22. Murray A.T., Matisziw T.C., Grubesic T.H. A methodological overview of network vulnerability analysis. Growth and Change 2008, 39:573-592.
23. Murray-Tuite P.M., Mahmassani H.S. Methodology for determining vulnerable links in a transportation network. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1882:88-96.
24. Nagurney A., Qiang Q. A network efficiency measure with application to critical infrastructure networks. Journal of Global Optimization 2008, 40:261-275.
25. Patterson S.A., Apostolakis G.E. Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2007, 92:1183-1203.
26. Snyder, J.P., 1987. Map Projections - A Working Manual. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1395. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
27. Sohn J. Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: an accessibility approach. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:491-506.
28. Suarez P., Anderson W., Mahal V., Lakshmanan T.R. Impacts of flooding and climate change on urban transportation: a systemwide performance assessment of the Boston Metro Area. Transportation Research Part D 2005, 10:231-244.
29. Sullivan J.L., Novak D.C., Aultman-Hall L., Scott D.M. Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: a link-based capacity-reduction approach. Transportation Research Part A 2010, 44:323-336.
30. Tatano H., Tsuchiya S. A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: a spatial computable general equilibrium approach. Natural Hazards 2008, 44:253-265.
31. Taylor M.A.P. Critical transport infrastructure in urban areas: impacts of traffic incidents assessed using accessibility-based network vulnerability analysis. Growth and Change 2008, 39:593-616.
32. Taylor M.A.P., Sehkar S.V.C., D'Este G.M. Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 2006, 6:267-291.
33. van Knoop V., Zuylen H., Hoogendoorn S. The need of spillback modelling when assessing consequences of blockings in a road network. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 2008, 8:287-300.
34. Wesemann L., Hamilton T., Tabaie S., Bare G. Cost-of-delay studies for freeway closures caused by Northridge earthquake. Transportation Research Record 1996, 1559:67-75.
35. Zhu S., Levinson D., Liu H.X., Harder K. The traffic and behavioral effects of the I-35W Mississippi River bridge collapse. Transportation Research Part A 2010, 44:771-784.