Structure alignment of membrane proteins: Accuracy of available tools and a consensus strategy

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 83, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1720-1732

  Stamm, Marcus ^a   Forrest, Lucy R ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

Author keywords

Beta barrel; Conformational change; Flexible alignment; Homology modeling; Integral membrane protein; Protein structure; Structure comparison

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONSENSUS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; EVALUATION STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RELIABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 84939547312     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24857     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Hasegawa H, Holm L. Advances and pitfalls of protein structural alignment. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009;19:341-348.
2. Berbalk C, Schwaiger CS, Lackner P. Accuracy analysis of multiple structure alignments. Protein Sci 2009;18:2027-2035.
3. Kolodny R, Koehl P, Levitt M. Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. J Mol Biol 2005;346:1173-1188.
4. Sadowski MI, Taylor WR. Evolutionary inaccuracy of pairwise structural alignments. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1209-1215.
5. Slater AW, Castellanos JI, Sippl MJ, Melo F. Towards the development of standardized methods for comparison, ranking and evaluation of structure alignments. Bioinformatics 2012;29:47-53.
6. Jones DT. Do transmembrane protein superfolds exist? FEBS Lett 1998;423:281-285.
7. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001;305:567-580.
8. Nugent T, Jones DT. Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines. BMC Bioinform 2009;10:159.
9. Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson A, Kampf C, Sjostedt E, Asplund A, Olsson I, Edlund K, Lundberg E, Navani S, Szigyarto CAK, Odeberg J, Djureinovic D, Takanen JO, Hober S, Alm T, Edqvist PH, Berling H, Tegel H, Mulder J, Rockberg J, Nilsson P, Schwenk JM, Hamsten M, von Feilitzen K, Forsberg M, Persson L, Johansson F, Zwahlen M, von Heijne G, Nielsen J, Ponten F. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 2015;347:1260419-1260419.
10. Ng PC, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. PHAT: a transmembrane-specific substitution matrix. Bioinformatics 2000;16:760-766.
11. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A mutation data matrix for transmembrane proteins. FEBS Lett 1994;339:269-275.
12. Lehnert U, Xia Y, Royce TE, Goh C-S, Liu Y, Senes A, Yu H, Zhang ZL, Engelman DM, Gerstein M. Computational analysis of membrane proteins: genomic occurrence, structure prediction and helix interactions. Quart Rev Biophys 1999;37:121-146.
13. Vinothkumar KR, Henderson R. Structures of membrane proteins. Quart Rev Biophys 2010;43:65-158.
14. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
15. Yang AS, Honig B. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance. J Mol Biol 2000;301:665-678.
16. Pabuwal V, Li Z. Comparative analysis of the packing topology of structurally important residues in helical membrane and soluble proteins. J Mol Biol 2008;22:67-73.
17. Holm L, Park J. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics 2000;16:566-567.
18. Holm L, Rosenstrom P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38(Web Server issue):W545-W549.
19. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
20. White SH. Biophysical dissection of membrane proteins. Nature 2009;459:344-346.
21. Stamm M, Staritzbichler R, Khafizov K, Forrest LR. Alignment of helical membrane protein sequences using AlignMe. PloS One 2013;8:e57731.
22. Tusnady GE, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. PDB_TM: selection and membrane localization of transmembrane proteins in the protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Database issue):D275-D278.
23. Kozma D, Simon I, Tusnady GE. PDBTM: Protein Data Bank of transmembrane proteins after 8 years. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41(Database issue):D524-D529.
24. Tusnady GE, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. Transmembrane proteins in the Protein Data Bank: identification and classification. Bioinformatics 2004;20:2964-2972.
25. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:2302-2309.
26. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998;11:739-747.
27. Taylor WR. Protein structure comparison using iterated double dynamic programming. Protein Sci 1999;8:654-665.
28. Taylor WR. Protein structure comparison using SAP. Methods Mol Biol 2000;143:19-32.
29. Jung J, Lee B. Protein structure alignment using environmental profiles. Protein Eng 2000;13:535-543.
30. Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 2002;11:2606-2621.
31. Ye Y, Godzik A. FATCAT: a web server for flexible structure comparison and structure similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(Web Server issue):W582-W585.
32. Veeramalai M, Ye Y, Godzik A. TOPS++FATCAT: fast flexible structural alignment using constraints derived from TOPS+ Strings Model. BMC Bioinform 2008;9:358.
33. Martinez L, Andreani R, Martinez JM. Convergent algorithms for protein structural alignment. BMC Bioinform 2007;8:306.
34. Teichert F, Bastolla U, Porto M. SABERTOOTH: protein structural alignment based on a vectorial structure representation. BMC Bioinform 2007;8:425.
35. Pandit SB, Skolnick J. Fr-TM-align: a new protein structural alignment method based on fragment alignments and the TM-score. BMC Bioinform 2008;9:531.
36. Menke M, Berger B, Cowen L. Matt: local flexibility aids protein multiple structure alignment. PLoS Computat Biol 2008;4:e10.
37. Csaba G, Birzele F, Zimmer R. Protein structure alignment considering phenotypic plasticity. Bioinformatics 2008;24:i98-104.
38. Collier JH, Allison L, Lesk AM, Garcia de la Banda M, Konagurthu AS. A new statistical framework to assess structural alignment quality using information compression. Bioinformatics 2014;30:i512-i518.
39. Šali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
40. Kabsch W. Solution for best rotation to relate 2 sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 1976;32(Sep1):922-923.
41. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995;23:2-5.
42. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round II. Proteins 1997;29:(Suppl 1):2-6.
43. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
44. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.
45. Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JN, Kiefer F, Schwede T. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 2007;69 (Suppl 8):38-56.
46. Forrest LR, Tang CL, Honig B. On the accuracy of homology modeling and sequence alignment methods applied to membrane proteins. Biophys J 2006;91:508-517.
47. Olechnovic K, Kulberkyte E, Venclovas C. CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models. Proteins 2013;81:149-162.
48. Reddy CS, Vijayasarathy K, Srinivas E, Sastry GM, Sastry GN. Homology modeling of membrane proteins: a critical assessment. Computat Biol Chem 2006;30:120-126.
49. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons of grouped data by ranking methods. J Econ Entomol 1946;39:269.
50. Hill JR, Deane CM. MP-T: improving membrane protein alignment for structure prediction. Bioinformatics 2013;29:54-61.
51. Bernsel A, Viklund H, Hennerdal A, Elofsson A. TOPCONS: consensus prediction of membrane protein topology. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37 (Suppl 2):W465-W468.
52. Lomize MA, Lomize AL, Pogozheva ID, Mosberg HI. OPM: orientations of proteins in membranes database. Bioinformatics 2006;22:623-625.
53. Forrest LR. (Pseudo-)symmetrical transport. Science 2013;339:399-401.
54. Forrest LR, Zhang Y-W, Jacobs MT, Gesmonde J, Xie L, Honig B, Rudnick G. A mechanism for alternating access in neurotransmitter transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:10338-10343.
55. Radestock S, Forrest LR. Outward-facing conformation of MFS transporters revealed by inverted-topology repeats. J Mol Biol 2011;407:698-715.
56. Ray A, Lindahl E, Wallner B. Improved model quality assessment using ProQ2. BMC Bioinform 2012;13:224.
57. Kim C, Basner J, Lee B. Detecting internally symmetric protein structures. BMC Bioinform 2010;11:303.
58. Myers-Turnbull D, Bliven SE, Rose PW, Aziz ZK, Youkharibache P, Bourne PE, Prlic A. Systematic detection of internal symmetry in proteins using CE-Symm. J Mol Biol 2014;426:2255-2268.
59. Choi S, Jeon J, Yang J-S, Kim S. Common occurrence of internal repeat symmetry in membrane proteins. Proteins 2008;71:68-80.