Towards the development of standardized methods for comparison, ranking and evaluation of structure alignments

Bioinformatics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 47-53

  Slater, Alex W ^a,b   Castellanos, Javier I ^b   Sippl, Manfred J ^c   Melo, Francisco ^a,b  

^a Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 84871813016     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts600     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Durbin, R. et al. (1998) Biological Sequence Analysis. Vol. 2, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 12-32.
2. Feng, Z.K. and Sippl, M.J. (1996) Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Fold. Des., 1, 123-132. (Pubitemid 126748167)
3. Hasegawa, H. and Holm, L. (2009) Advances and pitfalls of protein structural alignment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 19, 341-348.
4. Holm, L. (2000) DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics, 16, 566-567.
5. Ibarra, I.L. and Melo, F. (2010) Interactive software tool to comprehend the calculation of optimal sequence alignments with dynamic programming. Bioinformatics, 26, 1664-1665.
6. Kabsch, W. (1976) A solution of the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. B, 32, 922.
7. Kabsch, W. (1978) A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. A, 34, 827-828.
8. Konagurthu, A.S. et al. (2006) MUSTANG: a multiple structural alignment algorithm. Proteins, 64, 559-574. (Pubitemid 44100724)
9. Madhusudhan, M.S. et al. (2009) Alignment of multiple protein structures based on sequence and structure features. Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 22, 569-574.
10. Mizuguchi, K. et al. (1998) HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci., 7, 2469-2471. (Pubitemid 28506965)
11. Ortiz, A.R. et al. (2002) MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci., 11, 2606-2621. (Pubitemid 35191136)
12. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779-815. (Pubitemid 24007801)
13. Shindyalov, I.N. and Bourne, P.E. (1998) Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng., 11, 739-747. (Pubitemid 28434482)
14. Sippl, M.J. (2008) On distance and similarity in fold space. Bioinformatics, 24, 872-873. (Pubitemid 351386931)
15. Sippl, M.J. and Stegbuchner, H. (1991) Superposition of three-dimensional objects: a fast and numerically stable algorithm for the calculation of the matrix of optimal rotation. Comput. Chem., 15, 73-78.
16. Sippl, M.J. and Wiederstein, M. (2008) Structural bioinformatics A note on difficult structure alignment problems. Bioinformatics, 24, 426-427. (Pubitemid 351189021)
17. Smith, T.F. and Waterman, M.S. (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol., 147, 195-197.
18. Sippl, M.J. and Wiederstein, M. (2012) Detection of spatial correlations in protein structures and molecular complexes. Structure, 20, 718-728.
19. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2005) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 2302-2309. (Pubitemid 41439897)