CAD-score: A new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 149-162

  Olechnovič, Kliment ^a   Kulberkyte, Eleonora ^a   Venclovas, Česlovas ^a  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

CASP; Domain rearrangement; GDT; Model accuracy; Multi subunit structures; Physical realism; Protein structure; Residue residue contacts

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTACT AREA DIFFERENCE SCORE; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84871040640     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24172     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kabsch W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallograp Sec A 1976; 32: 922-923.
2. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995; 23: ii-v.
3. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round II. Proteins 1997; Suppl 1: 2-6.
4. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999; Suppl 3: 22-29.
5. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4. Proteins 2001; Suppl 5: 13-21.
6. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000; 16: 776-785.
7. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004; 57: 702-710.
8. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J, Rost B, Tramontano A. Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures. Proteins 2009; 77: 18-28.
9. Sadreyev RI, Shi S, Baker D, Grishin NV. Structure similarity measure with penalty for close non-equivalent residues. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 1259-1263.
10. Aloy P, Stark A, Hadley C, Russell RB. Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins 2003; 53: 436-456.
11. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Sadreyev RI, Qi Y, Pei J, Cheng H, Grishin NV. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins 2003; 53: 395-409.
12. Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JN, Kiefer F, Schwede T. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 2007; 69: 38-56.
13. Keedy DA, Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Arendall WB, III, Chen VB, Kapral GJ, Gillespie RA, Block JN, Zemla A, Richardson DC, Richardson JS. The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models. Proteins 2009; 77: 29-49.
14. Mariani V, Kiefer F, Schmidt T, Haas J, Schwede T. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011; 79: 37-58.
15. Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, Clarke ND. Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 2007; 69: 57-67.
16. Ben-David M, Noivirt-Brik O, Paz A, Prilusky J, Sussman JL, Levy Y. Assessment of CASP8 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 2009; 77: 50-65.
17. Shi S, Pei J, Sadreyev RI, Kinch LN, Majumdar I, Tong J, Cheng H, Kim BH, Grishin NV. Analysis of CASP8 targets, predictions and assessment methods. Database (Oxford) 2009; bap003.
18. Abagyan RA, Totrov MM. Contact area difference (CAD): a robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models. J Mol Biol 1997; 268: 678-685.
19. Kim DS, Cho Y, Kim D. Euclidean Voronoi diagram of 3D balls and its computation via tracing edges. Comput Aided Design 2005; 37: 1412-1424.
20. Li AJ, Nussinov R. A set of van der Waals and coulombic radii of protein atoms for molecular and solvent-accessible surface calculation, packing evaluation, and docking. Proteins 1998; 32: 111-127.
21. McConkey BJ, Sobolev V, Edelman M. Quantification of protein surfaces, volumes and atom-atom contacts using a constrained Voronoi procedure. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 1365-1373.
22. Olechnovič K, Margelevičius M, Venclovas Č. Voroprot: an interactive tool for the analysis and visualization of complex geometric features of protein structure. Bioinformatics 2011; 27: 723-724.
23. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Tramontano A. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-round IX. Proteins 2011; 79: 1-5.
24. Tramontano A, Cozzetto D, Giorgetti A, Raimondo D. The assessment of methods for protein structure prediction. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 413: 43-57.
25. Kryshtafovych A, Moult J, Bartual SG, Bazan JF, Berman H, Casteel DE, Christodoulou E, Everett JK, Hausmann J, Heidebrecht T, Hills T, Hui R, Hunt JF, Seetharaman J, Joachimiak A, Kennedy MA, Kim C, Lingel A, Michalska K, Montelione GT, Otero JM, Perrakis A, Pizarro JC, van Raaij MJ, Ramelot TA, Rousseau F, Tong L, Wernimont AK, Young J, Schwede T. Target highlights in CASP9: Experimental target structures for the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction. Proteins 2011; 79: 6-20.
26. Kinch LN, Shi S, Cheng H, Cong Q, Pei J, Mariani V, Schwede T, Grishin NV. CASP9 target classification. Proteins 2011; 79: 21-36.
27. Chen VB, Arendall WB, 3rd, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010; 66: 12-21.
28. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 3370-3374.
29. MacCallum JL, Perez A, Schnieders MJ, Hua L, Jacobson MP, Dill KA. Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9. Proteins 2011; 79: 74-90.