Distinct polymer physics principles govern chromatin dynamics in mouse and Drosophila topological domains

BMC Genomics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Ea, Vuthy ^a   Sexton, Tom ^b   Gostan, Thierry ^a   Herviou, Laurie ^a   Baudement, Marie Odile ^a   Zhang, Yunzhe ^c   Berlivet, Soizik ^a   Le Lay Taha, Marie Noëlle ^a   Cathala, Guy ^a,d   Lesne, Annick ^a,d   Victor, Jean Marc ^a,d   Fan, Yuhong ^c   Cavalli, Giacomo ^b,d   Forné, Thierry ^a,d  

^a INSTITUT DE GÉNÉTIQUE MOLÉCULAIRE DE MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Chromatin dynamics; Epigenetics; H1 histone; Polymer models; Topological domains

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H1; CHROMATIN; DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETICS; EUKARYOTE; GENE FUNCTION; LIVER CELL; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROTEIN DEPLETION; TOPOLOGICALLY ASSOCIATING DOMAIN; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONFORMATION; CYTOLOGY; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; LIVER; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; LIVER; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION;

EID: 84939174747     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1786-8     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science. 2002;295:1306-11.
2. de Wit E, de Laat W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev. 2012;26:11-24.
3. Hagège H, Klous P, Braem C, Splinter E, Dekker J, Cathala G, et al. Quantitative analysis of chromosome conformation capture assays (3C-qPCR). Nat Protoc. 2007;2:1722-33.
4. Court F, Miro J, Braem C, Lelay-Taha M-N, Brisebarre A, Atger F, et al. Modulated contact frequencies at gene-rich loci support a statistical helix model for mammalian chromatin organization. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R42.
5. Duan Z, Andronescu M, Schutz K, McIlwain S, Kim YJ, Lee C, et al. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature. 2010;465:363-7.
6. Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, Leblanc B, Hoichman M, et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell. 2012;148:458-72.
7. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485:376-80.
8. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009;326:289-93.
9. Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, et al. A 3D Map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159:1665-80.
10. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, Okamoto I, Servant N, et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature. 2012;485(7398):381-5.
11. Giorgetti L, Servant N, Heard E. Changes in the organization of the genome during the mammalian cell cycle. Genome Biol. 2013;14:142.
12. Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, Zhan Y, Lajoie BR, Mirny LA, et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science. 2013;342:948-53.
13. Van Bortle K, Nichols MH, Li L, Ong CT, Takenaka N, Qin ZS, et al. Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R82.
14. Zuin J, Dixon JR, van der Reijden MI, Ye Z, Kolovos P, Brouwer RW, et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:996-1001.
15. Andrey G, Montavon T, Mascrez B, Gonzalez F, Noordermeer D, Leleu M, et al. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science. 2013;340:1234167.
16. Cavalli G, Misteli T. Functional implications of genome topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20:290-9.
17. Gibcus JH, Dekker J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol Cell. 2013;49:773-82.
18. Giorgetti L, Galupa R, Nora EP, Piolot T, Lam F, Dekker J, et al. Predictive polymer modeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription. Cell. 2014;157:950-63.
19. Nobrega MA, Zhu Y, Plajzer-Frick I, Afzal V, Rubin EM. Megabase deletions of gene deserts result in viable mice. Nature. 2004;431:988-93.
20. Mirny LA. The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome Res. 2011;19:37-51.
21. Dekker J. Mapping in vivo chromatin interactions in yeast suggests an extended chromatin fiber with regional variation in compaction. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:34532-40.
22. Fan Y, Nikitina T, Zhao J, Fleury TJ, Bhattacharyya R, Bouhassira EE, et al. Histone H1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell. 2005;123:1199-212.
23. Happel N, Doenecke D. Histone H1 and its isoforms: contribution to chromatin structure and function. Gene. 2009;431:1-12.
24. Recouvreux P, Lavelle C, Barbi M, Conde E, Silva N, Le Cam E, et al. Linker histones incorporation maintains chromatin fiber plasticity. Biophys J. 2011;100:2726-35.
25. Cao K, Lailler N, Zhang Y, Kumar A, Uppal K, Liu Z, et al. High-resolution mapping of h1 linker histone variants in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003417.
26. Ben-Haim E, Lesne A, Victor JM. Chromatin: a tunable spring at work inside chromosomes. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001;64:051921.
27. Wedemann G, Langowski J. Computer simulation of the 30-nanometer chromatin fiber. Biophys J. 2002;82:2847-59.
28. Schuettengruber B, Oded Elkayam N, Sexton T, Entrevan M, Stern S, Thomas A, et al. Cooperativity, specificity, and evolutionary stability of polycomb targeting in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 2014;9:219-33.
29. Riddle NC, Jung YL, Gu T, Alekseyenko AA, Asker D, Gui H, et al. Enrichment of HP1a on Drosophila chromosome 4 genes creates an alternate chromatin structure critical for regulation in this heterochromatic domain. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002954.
30. Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E, Scambler PJ, Brown DT, Misteli T. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell. 2006;10:105-16.
31. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, Giannoukos G, et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature. 2007;448:553-60.
32. Efroni S, Duttagupta R, Cheng J, Dehghani H, Hoeppner DJ, Dash C, et al. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:437-47.
33. Fussner E, Djuric U, Strauss M, Hotta A, Perez-Iratxeta C, Lanner F, et al. Constitutive heterochromatin reorganization during somatic cell reprogramming. EMBO J. 2011;30:1778-89.
34. Visel A, Blow MJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, Holt A, et al. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature. 2009;457:854-8.
35. Sanyal A, Lajoie BR, Jain G, Dekker J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature. 2012;489:109-13.
36. Barbieri M, Chotalia M, Fraser J, Lavitas LM, Dostie J, Pombo A, et al. Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:16173-8.
37. Barbieri M, Fraser J, Lavitas LM, Chotalia M, Dostie J, Pombo A, et al. A polymer model explains the complexity of large-scale chromatin folding. Nucleus. 2013;4:267-73.
38. Braem C, Recolin B, Rancourt RC, Angiolini C, Barthes P, Branchu P, et al. Genomic matrix attachment region and chromosome conformation capture quantitative real time PCR assays identify novel putative regulatory elements at the imprinted Dlk1/Gtl2 locus. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:18612-20.
39. Court F, Baniol M, Hagège H, Petit JS, Lelay-Taha M-N, Carbonell F, et al. Long-range chromatin interactions at the mouse Igf2/H19 locus reveal a novel paternally expressed long non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:5893-906.
40. Lutfalla G, Uzé G. Performing quantitative reverse-transcribed polymerase chain reaction experiments. Methods Enzymol. 2006;410:386-400.
41. Rippe K. Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2001;26:733-40.
42. Gerchman SE, Ramakrishnan V. Chromatin higher-order structure studied by neutron scattering and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:7802-6.
43. Ghirlando R, Felsenfeld G. Hydrodynamic studies on defined heterochromatin fragments support a 30-nm fiber having six nucleosomes per turn. J Mol Biol. 2008;376(5):1417-25.
44. Dalal Y, Fleury TJ, Cioffi A, Stein A. Long-range oscillation in a periodic DNA sequence motif may influence nucleosome array formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(3):934-45.