Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1513-1518

  Zeng, Min ^a   Xie, Jie ^a   Li, Mingqing ^a   Lin, Shaoru ^a   Hu, Yihe ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cementless; Extensively coated; Femoral revision; Modular tapered

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTED PROSTHESIS; CEMENTLESS FEMORAL REVISION; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP PAIN; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS DISLOCATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; VERY ELDERLY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT; BONE; CEMENTATION; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; POROSITY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE AND BONES; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 84938989629     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2696-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hartman CW, Garvin KL (2012) Femoral fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 61:313–325
2. Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J (2011) A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 82(2):136–142
3. Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ, Kenny NW (2009) Bone cement implantation syndrome. Br J Anaesth 102(1):12–22
4. Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O'Byrne JM (2013) Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 5(1):e8
5. Bohm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(7):1023–1031
6. Reikeras O, Gunderson RB (2006) Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10–16 years. Acta Orthop 77(1):98–103
7. Duncan WW, Hubble MJ, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ, Gie GA (2009) Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(5):577–582
8. Neumann D, Dueckelmann L, Thaler C, Dorn U (2012) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless tapered revision stem in patients with a mean age of 82 years. Int Orthop 36(5):961–965
9. Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Paprosky WG (2013) Femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(10):601–612
10. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM (1993) Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (295): 172–178
11. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(1):45–55
12. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2004) Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (429):227–231
13. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res (257):107–128
14. Moon KH, Kang JS, Lee SH, Jung SR (2009) Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop Surg 1(2):105–109
15. Woolson ST, Delaney TJ (1995) Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(Suppl):S22–S28
16. Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R, Ganz R (2002) Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: results at 2–9 years. Int Orthop 26(1):36–39
17. Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (417):203–209
18. Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Garbuz DS (2010) Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):491–496
19. Babis GC, Sakellariou VI, O'Connor MI, Hanssen AD, Sim FH (2010) Proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis composites in revision hip replacement: a 12-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(3):349–355
20. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR (1994) Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(7):965–973
21. Bugbee WD, Culpepper WN, Engh CJ, Engh CS (1997) Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(7):1007–1012
22. Patel PD, Klika AK, Murray TG, Elsharkawy KA, Krebs VE, Barsoum WK (2010) Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(6):926–931
23. Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lee P, Gross AE (2010) Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem. Hip Int 20(2):136–142
24. Wang L, Dai Z, Wen T, Li M, Hu Y (2013) Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(2):275–281
25. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (369):230–242