Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless tapered revision stem in patients with a mean age of 82 years

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 961-965

  Neumann, Daniel ^a   Dueckelmann, Lothar ^a   Thaler, Christoph ^a   Dorn, Ulrich ^a  

^a Orthopedic University Clinic   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEMALE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT MOBILITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863779476     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1379-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Korovessis P, Repantis T (2009) High medium-term survival of Zweymüller slr-plus stem used in femoral revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(8):2032-2040
2. Boehm P, Bischel O (2004) The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:148-159
3. Chang JD, Kim TY, Rao MB, Lee SS, Kim IS (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a tapered, press-fit cementless revision stem in elderly patients. J Arthroplasty 26(7):1045-1049
4. Zweymüller K, Steindl M, Melmer T (2005) Anterior windowing of the femur diaphysis for cement removal in revision surgery. Clin Orthop 441:227-236 (Pubitemid 44384226)
5. Zweymüller K (2007) Good results with an uncoated grit-blasted tapered straight stem at ten years. Interact Surg 2:197-205
6. Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:55-60
7. D'Aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 36:451-475
8. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 51:737-755
9. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17-27 (Pubitemid 10233166)
10. Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 231:7-28
11. Gundolf F (2007) Compression cerclage. In: 25 years of biologic fixation, Ed.: Friedrich N, Santore R. Elsevier, Urban+Fischer, Munich
12. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE et al (1988) Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:214-220 (Pubitemid 18264720)
13. Holt G, Hook S, Hubble M (2011) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants. Int Orthop 35(2):267-273
14. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:230-242
15. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM et al (2000) Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplast 15:840-846
16. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P (2003) A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 18:94-98
17. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG (1997) 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:839-844
18. Weiss RJ, Beckman MO, Enocson A et al (2011) Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 1:16-23
19. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H et al (1996) The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 67:541-546
20. Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R et al (2002) Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: results at 2-9 years. Int Orthop 26:36-39 (Pubitemid 36055912)
21. Mertl P, Philippot R, Rosset P, Migaud H, Tabutin J, Van de Velde D (2011) Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and periprosthetic fractures. Int Orthop 35(2):275-282
22. Parvizi J, Pour AE, Keshavarzi NR, D'Apuzzo M, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. A case-control study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89(12):2612-2618 (Pubitemid 350230614)
23. Meek RM, Garbuz DS, Masri BA et al (2004) Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86A:480-484
24. Lintner F, Huber M, Böhm G, Attems J, Wais R (1996) Der Schneide-Schleif Effekt als wichtiger Parameter zur ossären Einheilung zementfreier Pfannen (German). In: Zweymüller K (ed) 15 Jahre Zweymüller Hüftprothese. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern