A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: A population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 136-142

  Weiss, Rüdiger J ^a   Stark, André ^b   Kärrholm, Johan ^c  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTED LONG STEM PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODULAR CEMENTLESS REVISION PROSTHESIS; MULTIPLE PREVIOUS REVISION; OSTEOLYSIS; REOPERATION; SHORT HEAD NECK LENGTH; SHORT STEM LENGTH; STANDARD NECK OFFSET; SURGICAL RISK; SURVIVAL;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; SWEDEN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79953824566     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.566145     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bohm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83: 1023-31. (Pubitemid 32662104)
2. Hailer N P, Garellick G, Karrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1): 34-41.
3. Hultmark P, Kärrholm J, Stromberg C, Herberts P, Mose C H, Malchau H. Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7 to 13 years' follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 551-61. (Pubitemid 30622631)
4. Kavanagh B F, Ilstrup D M, Fitzgerald R H Jr. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1985; 67: 517-26. (Pubitemid 15077717)
5. Kwong L M, Miller A J, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 94-7. (Pubitemid 36542570)
6. Lie S A, Engesaeter L B, Havelin L I, Gjessing H K, Vollset S E. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23: 3227-40. (Pubitemid 39334909)
7. Lieberman J R. Cemented femoral revision: lest we forget. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 72-4. (Pubitemid 41327566)
8. Link M P reconstruction prosthesis, cementless. Surgical technique. Waldemar Link GmbH & Co KG, Hamburg/Germany, 2005.
9. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Söderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 2) 2002; 84: 2-20. (Pubitemid 35168331)
10. McInnis D P, Horne G, Devane P A. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 372-80.
11. Mulroy W F, Harris W H. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78: 325-30.
12. Ovesen O, Emmeluth C, Hofbauer C, Overgaard S. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered stem with distal fixation: good short-term results in 125 revisions. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (3): 348-54.
13. Pellicci P M, Wilson P D Jr., Sledge C B, Salvati E A, Ranawat C S, Poss R, Callaghan J J. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1985; 67: 513-6. (Pubitemid 15077716)
14. Retpen J B, Jensen J S. Risk factors for recurrent aseptic loosening of the femoral component after cemented revision. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8: 471-8. (Pubitemid 23306286)
15. Rodriguez J A, Fada R, Murphy S B, Rasquinha V J, Ranawat C S. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 751-8.
16. Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 306-9. (Pubitemid 38931241)
17. Söderman P, Malchau M, Herberts P, Johnell O. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 884-9.
18. Sporer S M, Paprosky W G. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: the use of modular stems. Clin Orthop 2004; (429): 227-31. (Pubitemid 39579217)
19. Strömberg C N, Herberts P. A multicenter 10-year study of cemented revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old. A follow-up report. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 595-601.
20. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2008, http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/.
21. Tamvakopoulos G S, Servant C T, Clark G, Ivory J P. Medium-term follow-up series using a modular distal fixation prosthesis to address proximal femoral bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. A 5- to 9-year follow-up study. Hip Int 2007; 17: 143-9. (Pubitemid 350186833)
22. Weiss R J, Stromwall F, Beckman M O, Hansson K A, Stark A. Distal femoral stem-bone anchorage of a cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 298-302.
23. Weiss R J, Beckman M O, Enocson A, Schmalholz A, Stark A. Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (1): 16-23.
24. Wirtz D C, Heller K D, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto R P, Zeiler G, Blencke B A, Forst R. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 134-8. (Pubitemid 30601510)