448 AJR:205, August 2015 quantitative maximum shear- wave stiffness of breast masses as a predictor of histopathologic severity

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 448-455

  Berg, Wendie A ^a   Mendelson, Ellen B ^b   Cosgrove, David O ^c   Doré, Caroline J ^d   Gay, Joel ^e   Henry, Jean Pierre ^e   Cohen Bacrie, Claude ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e SUPERSONIC IMAGINE   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast ultrasound; Quantitative imaging; Shear wave elastography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATYPICAL DUCTAL HYPERPLASIA; BREAST ABSCESS; BREAST CYST; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST FIBROSIS; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CANCER GRADING; ELASTOGRAPHY; EUROPE; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LIPOMA; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NECROSIS; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; NECROSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84938692410     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13448     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Doré CJ, et al.; BE1 Study Group. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:1023-1032
2. Garra BS. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23:255-268
3. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239:341-350
4. Hiltawsky KM, Krüger M, Starke C, Heuser L, Ermert H, Jensen A. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27:1461-1469
5. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 2010; 256:297-303
6. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, et al.; BE1 Investigators. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012; 262:435-449
7. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 2006; 241:355-365
8. Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:1015-1026
9. Kim MY, Cho N, Yi A, Koo HR, Yun BL, Moon WK. Sonoelastography in distinguishing benign from malignant complex breast mass and making the decision to biopsy. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14:559-567
10. Cho N, Jang M, Lyou CY, Park JS, Choi HY, Moon WK. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color Doppler US-influence on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2012; 262:80-90
11. Zhi H, Xiao XY, Ou B, et al. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small ( 2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:3216-3221
12. Evans A, Rauchhaus P, Whelehan P, et al. Does shear wave ultrasound independently predict axillary lymph node metastasis in women with invasive breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 143:153-157
13. Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Kim JA, Jeong J. Shear-wave elastography of invasive breast cancer: correlation between quantitative mean elasticity value and immunohistochemical profile. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 138:119-126
14. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology 2012; 263:673-677
15. Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH, et al. Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:2450-2458
16. Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Wojcinski S, Dwamena BA. Impact of breast mass size on accuracy of ultrasound elastography vs. conventional B-mode ultrasound: a meta-analysis of individual participants. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:1006-1014
17. Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS Ultrasound. In: ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013
18. Rzymski P, Opala T. Morphological analysis of breast cystic lesions in shear wave elastography. Wspolczesna Onkol 2011; 15:208-212
19. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up. Radiology 2013; 268:673-683
20. Barr RG, Lackey AE. The utility of the "bull'seye" artifact on breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsy rate. Ultrasound Q 2011; 27:151-155
21. Blaichman J, Marcus JC, Alsaadi T, El-Khoury M, Meterissian S, Mesurolle B. Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade. AJR 2012; 199:[web]W402-W408
22. Irshad A, Leddy R, Pisano E, et al. Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting the biological behavior of breast cancer. AJR 2013; 200:284-290
23. Wojcinski S, Soliman AA, Schmidt J, et al. Sonographic features of triple-negative and non-triplenegative breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31:1531-1541
24. Evans A, Armstrong S, Whelehan P, et al. Can shear-wave elastography predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer? Br J Cancer 2013; 109:2798-2802
25. Cho N, Moon WK, Chang JM, et al. Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:1618-1627
26. Baltzer PA, Yang F, Dietzel M, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of unilateral edema on T2w-TSE sequences in MR-mammography considering 974 histologically verified lesions. Breast J 2010; 16:233-239
27. Berg WA. Echogenic rim (US). In: Berg WA, Yang WT, eds. Diagnostic imaging: breast, 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Amirsys, 2014:4-186-189
28. Meier-Meitinger M, Haberle L, Fasching PA, et al. Assessment of breast cancer tumour size using six different methods. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:1180-1187
29. Zhou J, Zhan W, Chang C, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the "stiff rim" sign. Radiology 2014; 272:63-72
30. Wojcinski S, Brandhorst K, Sadigh G, Hillemanns P, Degenhardt F. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch tissue quantification: measurements of normal breast tissue and dependence on the degree of pre-compression. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39:2226-2232
31. Lee SH, Cho N, Chang JM, et al. Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Radiology 2014; 270:344-353
32. Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Chung J, Kim JA, Kim EK. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shearwave elastography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:1519-1527
33. Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, et al. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging. Radiology 2014; 273:61-69