Sonographic appearance of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast according to histologic grade

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 199, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Blaichman, Jason ^a   Marcus, James C ^a   Alsaadi, Tahra ^a   El Khoury, Mona ^a   Meterissian, Sarkis ^a   Mesurolle, Benoít ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

BI RADS lexicon; Breast ultrasound; Grade; Invasive ductal carcinoma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84865601706     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7374     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Skaane P, Engedal K. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR 1998; 170:109-114
2. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134
3. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
4. Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, Wells CA. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 2000; 55:40-44
5. Rotstein AH, Neerhut PK. Ultrasound characteristics of histologically proven grade 3 invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Australas Radiol 2005; 49:476-479
6. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19:403-410
7. Kobayashi T. Diagnostic ultrasound in breast cancer: analysis of retrotumorous echo patterns correlated with sonic attenuation by cancerous connective tissue. J Clin Ultrasound 1979; 7:471-479
8. Schrading S, Kuhl CK. Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. Radiology 2008; 246:58-70
9. Gozzi G, Cressa C, Bazzocchi M, Stanta G, Vidali C. Causes of attenuation of the sound waves in neoplasms of the breast: histologic and echographic correlation study [in Italian]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1986; 72:195-198
10. Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeijn IM, et al. A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 2002; 102:91-95
11. Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 2009; 252:665-672
12. Prentice RL, Pyke R. Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika 1979; 66:403-411
13. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979; 6:65-70