Breast lesions: Quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging - Preliminary results

Radiology

Volumn 256, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 297-303

  Athanasiou, Alexandra ^a   Tardivon, Anne ^a   Tanter, Mickael ^b   Sigal Zafrani, Brigitte ^a   Bercoff, Jeremy ^c   Deffieux, Thomas ^b   Gennisson, Jean Luc ^b   Fink, Mathias ^b   Neuenschwander, Sylvia ^a  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c SUPERSONIC IMAGINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77953932845     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10090385     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sewell CW. Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33(6):1067-1080.
2. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. Pathology and genetics: tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon, France: IARC, 2003.
3. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions:initial clinical results. Radiology 1997;202(1):79-86. (Pubitemid 27024111)
4. Hiltawsky KM, Krüger M, Starke C, Heuser L, Ermert H, Jensen A. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions:clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27(11):1461-1469.
5. Thomas A, Kümmel S, Fritzsche F, et al. Real-time sonoelastography performed in addition to B-mode ultrasound and mammography: improved differentiation of breast lesions? Acad Radiol 2006;13 (12):1496-1504.
6. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239(2):341-350.
7. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007;245(2):401-410.
8. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2008;18(11):2381-2389.
9. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging:a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004;51(4):396-409.
10. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Muller M, Fink M. The role of viscosity in the impulse diffraction fi eld of elastic waves induced by the acoustic radiation force. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004;51(11):1523-1536.
11. Bercoff J, Chaffai S, Tanter M, et al. In vivo breast tumor detection using transient elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29(10):1387-1396.
12. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, et al. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34(9):1373-1386.
13. Sarvazyan AP. Biophysical bases of elasticity imaging. In:Acoustical imaging. Vol 21. New York, NY :Plenum, 1995;223-240.
14. American College of Radiology. Ultrasound. In:Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound system and transducers. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/ulstran.pdf. Published 1997. Accessed October 10, 2009.
16. Bercoff J, Criton A, Bacrie CC, et al. Shear-Wave TM Elastography: a new real time imaging mode for assessing quantitatively soft tissue viscoelasticity. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Beijing, China, November 2-5, 2008.
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148(3):839-843.
18. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koel-liker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 2006;239(2):385-391.